Research Article

Vision Improvement with Refractive Correction Does Not Completely Exclude Major Eye Diseases: Analyses of Visually Impaired South Korean Population in the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2009–2011

Table 5

Prevalence of ocular comorbidities, according to visual improvement after correction.

Group 1 ()Group 2 ()Group 3 () value
N%SEN%SEN%SE121323

Myopia22144.26%(3.03)28847.89%(2.56)130985.09%(1.00)0.3633<.0001<.0001
Hyperopia13824.91%(2.50)21428.45%(2.08)2168.91%(0.75)0.2896<.0001<.0001
Astigmatism40474.93%(2.78)54981.18%(1.84)85450.41%(1.48)0.0613<.0001<.0001
Strabismus6910.01%(1.47)101.40%(0.49)231.51%(0.41)<.0001<.00010.8631
Blepharoptosis20026.56%(2.34)16924.97%(2.13)1286.02%(0.74)0.5502<.0001<.0001
Cataract42556.74%(2.47)47770.69%(2.39)32519.89%(1.44)<.0001<.0001<.0001
Pterygium8812.52%(1.75)8011.12%(1.31)472.46%(0.41)0.5133<.0001<.0001
Corneal opacities4016.08%(2.89)57.48%(4.39)12.36%(2.36)0.19350.01970.2746
Glaucoma6011.93%(1.82)365.40%(1.10)403.31%(0.66)0.0014<.00010.0869
Diabetic retinopathy316.38%(1.40)244.53%(1.15)131.20%(0.40)0.3108<.00010.0003
Age-related macular degeneration5511.57%(1.74)5811.39%(1.77)543.76%(0.60)0.6433<.0001<.0001

The presence of cataract, pterygium, corneal opacities, diabetic retinopathy, and age-related macular degeneration was evaluated only in participants aged ≥ 19 years. 12: comparison between groups 1 and 2. 13: comparison between groups 1 and 3. 23: comparison between groups 2 and 3. value by chi-squared test.