Research Article

Regional Relationship between Macular Retinal Thickness and Corresponding Central Visual Field Sensitivity in Glaucoma Patients

Table 4

Comparison of MRT between the eyes with and without an abnormal 10-2 VF hemifield: superior MRT (S); inferior MRT (L).

MRT (μm)Abnormal inferior
VF hemifield
()
Normal inferior
VF hemifield
()
MRT
(μm)
Abnormal superior
VF hemifield
()
Normal superior
VF hemifield
()

S1227.07 ± 9.39231.53 ± 12.020.224L1218.46 ± 11.28223.01 ± 10.760.180
S2248.91 ± 11.92258.12 ± 15.920.009L2235.11 ± 14.00248.90 ± 14.130.001
S3260.59 ± 18.61273.13 ± 19.440.002L3243.96 ± 17.17264.01 ± 24.550.000
S4259.87 ± 23.33280.29 ± 27.240.003L4238.34 ± 39.34243.83 ± 82.670.011
S5248.05 ± 12.05251.36 ± 15.350.630L5242.13 ± 11.59250.44 ± 12.010.023
S6294.30 ± 15.58303.82 ± 23.240.052L6284.05 ± 13.90302.36 ± 15.950.000
S7305.07 ± 17.72320.63 ± 26.980.006L7302.99 ± 20.72314.47 ± 18.340.022
S8247.67 ± 45.07262.96 ± 78.600.020L8252.12 ± 62.62240.68 ± 84.050.989
S265.23 ± 12.55277.05 ± 18.160.005L255.86 ± 14.64270.78 ± 15.250.000

Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation.
MRT: macular retinal thickness; VF: visual field, .