Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume 2017, Article ID 3737603, 9 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/3737603
Research Article

Bimanual Microincision Cataract Surgery versus Coaxial Microincision Cataract Surgery: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials and Cohort Studies

Eye Center, Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China

Correspondence should be addressed to Ke Yao; nc.ude.ujz@nerlx

Received 6 April 2017; Accepted 24 July 2017; Published 23 August 2017

Academic Editor: Tamer A. Macky

Copyright © 2017 Chenxi Fu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. R. H. Osher and V. P. Injev, “Microcoaxial phacoemulsification part 1: laboratory studies,” Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, vol. 33, pp. 401–407, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. J. L. Alio, J. L. Rodriguez-Prats, A. Vianello, and A. Galal, “Visual outcome of microincision cataract surgery with implantation of an Acri. Smart lens,” Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, vol. 31, pp. 1549–1556, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. Y. Wang, Y. Xia, X. Liu, D. Zheng, L. Luo, and Y. Liu, “Comparison of bimanual and micro-coaxial phacoemulsification with torsional ultrasound,” Acta Ophthalmologica, vol. 90, pp. 184–187, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. T. Paul and R. Braga-Mele, “Bimanual microincisional phacoemulsification: the future of cataract surgery?” Current Opinion in Ophthalmology, vol. 16, pp. 2–7, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  5. M. P. Weikert, “Update on bimanual microincisional cataract surgery,” Current Opinion in Ophthalmology, vol. 17, pp. 62–67, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. C. von Sonnleithner, R. Bergholz, J. Gonnermann, M. K. Klamann, N. Torun, and E. Bertelmann, “Clinical results and higher-order aberrations after 1.4-mm biaxial cataract surgery and implantation of a new aspheric intraocular lens,” Ophthalmic Research, vol. 53, pp. 8–14, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. C. Chen, M. Zhu, Y. Sun, X. Qu, and X. Xu, “Bimanual microincision versus standard coaxial small-incision cataract surgery: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials,” European Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 25, pp. 119–127, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. X. Shentu, X. Zhang, X. Tang, and X. Yu, “Coaxial microincision cataract surgery versus standard coaxial small-incision cataract surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials,” PLoS One, vol. 11, article e0146676, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. D. Moher, A. Liberati, J. Tetzlaff, D. G. Altman, and PRISMA Group, “Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement,” International Journal of Surgery, vol. 8, pp. 336–341, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. J. P. Higgins, S. G. Thompson, J. J. Deeks, and D. G. Altman, “Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses,” British Medical Journal, vol. 327, pp. 557–590, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  11. R. Der Simonian and R. Kacker, “Random-effects model for meta-analysis of clinical trials: an update,” Contemporary Clinical Trials, vol. 28, pp. 105–114, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. M. Egger, G. Davey Smith, M. Schneider, and C. Minder, “Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test,” British Medical Journal, vol. 315, pp. 629–634, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  13. C. B. Begg and M. Mazumdar, “Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias,” Biometrics, vol. 50, pp. 1088–1101, 1994. View at Google Scholar
  14. G. M. Cavallini, L. Campi, C. Masini, S. Pelloni, and A. Pupino, “Bimanual microphacoemulsification versus coaxial miniphacoemulsification: prospective study,” Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, vol. 33, pp. 387–392, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. B. Elkady, D. Pinero, and J. L. Alio, “Corneal incision quality: microincision cataract surgery versus microcoaxial phacoemulsification,” Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, vol. 35, pp. 466–474, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. I. Can, T. Takmaz, Y. Yildiz, H. A. Bayhan, G. Soyugelen, and B. Bostanci, “Coaxial, microcoaxial, and biaxial microincision cataract surgery: prospective comparative study,” Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, vol. 36, pp. 740–746, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. I. Can, H. A. Bayhan, H. Celik, and B. Bostanci Ceran, “Anterior segment optical coherence tomography evaluation and comparison of main clear corneal incisions in microcoaxial and biaxial cataract surgery,” Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, vol. 37, pp. 490–500, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. I. Can, H. A. Bayhan, H. Celik, and B. B. Ceran, “Comparison of corneal aberrations after biaxial microincision and microcoaxial cataract surgeries: a prospective study,” Current Eye Research, vol. 37, pp. 18–24, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. J. L. Alió, F. Soria, A. A. Abdou, P. Peña-García, R. Fernández-Buenaga, and J. Javaloy, “Comparative outcomes of bimanual MICS and 2.2-mm coaxial phacoemulsification assisted by femtosecond technology,” Journal of Refractive Surgery, vol. 30, pp. 34–40, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  20. M. Wilczynski, E. Supady, P. Loba, A. Synder, D. Palenga-Pydyn, and W. Omulecki, “Comparison of early corneal endothelial cell loss after coaxial phacoemulsification through 1.8 mm microincision and bimanual phacoemulsification through 1.7 mm microincision,” Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, vol. 35, pp. 1570–1574, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. M. Wilczynski, E. Supady, L. Piotr, A. Synder, D. Palenga-Pydyn, and W. Omulecki, “Comparison of surgically induced astigmatism after coaxial phacoemulsification through 1.8 mm microincision and bimanual phacoemulsification through 1.7 mm microincision,” Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, vol. 35, pp. 1563–1569, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. I. H. Fine, R. S. Hoffman, and M. Packer, “Optimizing refractive lens exchange with bimanual microincision phacoemulsification,” Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, vol. 30, pp. 550–554, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. G. M. C. L. Cavallini, G. Torlai, M. Forlini, and E. Fornasari, “Clear corneal incisions in bimanual microincision cataract surgery: long-term wound-healing architecture,” Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, vol. 38, pp. 1743–1748, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. A. Behrens, W. J. Stark, K. A. Pratzer, and P. J. McDonnell, “Dynamics of small-incision clear cornea wounds after phacoemulsification surgery using optical coherence tomography in the early postoperative period,” Journal of Refractive Surgery, vol. 24, pp. 46–49, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  25. S.-P. Chee and K. Bacsal, “Endophthalmitis after microincision cataract surgery,” Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, vol. 31, pp. 1834-1835, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. J. L. Alio, B. Elkady, and D. Ortiz, “Corneal optical quality following sub 1.8 mm micro-incision cataract surgery vs. 2.2 mm mini-incision coaxial phacoemulsification,” Middle East African Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 17, pp. 94–99, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  27. Y. Jiang, Q. Le, J. Yang, and Y. Lu, “Changes in corneal astigmatism and high order aberrations after clear corneal tunnel phacoemulsification guided by corneal topography,” Journal of Refractive Surgery, vol. 22, pp. S1083–S1088, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  28. K. Yao, X. Tang, and P. Ye, “Corneal astigmatism, high order aberrations, and optical quality after cataract surgery: microincision versus small incision,” Journal of Refractive Surgery, vol. 22, pp. S1079–S1082, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  29. T. F. E. M. Eliwa and I. Hamza, “Effect of biaxial versus coaxial microincision cataract surgery on optical quality of the cornea,” Indian Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 63, pp. 487–490, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. J. L. R. P. J. Alio and A. Galal, Eds., MICS: MicroIncision Cataract Surgery, Highlights of Ophthalmology International, El Dorado, Panama, 2004.
  31. J. L. F. H. Alio, Ed., Minimizing Incisions and Maximizing Outcomes in Cataract Surgery, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany, 2010.
  32. G. M. Cavallini, T. Verdina, M. Forlini et al., “Long-term follow-up for bimanual microincision cataract surgery: comparison of results obtained by surgeons in training and experienced surgeons,” Clinical Ophthalmology, vol. 10, pp. 979–987, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. G. M. Cavallini, V. Volante, T. Verdina et al., “Results and complications of surgeons-in-training learning bimanual microincision cataract surgery,” Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, vol. 41, pp. 105–115, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus