Research Article

Quality of Vision after Deep Anterior Lamellar Keratoplasty (Fluid Dissection) Compared to Penetrating Keratoplasty for the Treatment of Keratoconus

Table 3

Postoperative comparison of ocular (whole eye) aberrometry and optical quality of consecutive eyes that underwent deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (fluid dissection) or penetrating keratoplasty for keratoconus.

AberrationsPKP
Mean ± SD
(min–max)
DALK
Mean ± SD
(min–max)
Test

HOA1.73 ± 1.131.59 ± 0.61t>0.05
(μm)(1.018–4.725)(0.173–2.763)

Coma1.35 ± 0.990.92 ± 0.52U>0.05
(μm)(0.122–3.805)(0.126–1.752)

Trefoil1.27 ± 1.290.97 ± 0.46U>0.05
(μm)(0.236–3.908)(0.057–1.913)

Tetrafoil0.45 ± 0.250.41 ± 0.19t>0.05
(μm)(0.159–0.973)(0.111–0.79)

Spherical like0.55 ± 0.280.52 ± 0.35U>0.05
(μm)(0.127–0.867)(0.061–1.325)

HOAst0.33 ± 0.110.27 ± 0.1t>0.05
(μm)(0.127–0.498)(0.069–0.486)

PSF4.08e−03 ± 2.84e−037.92e−03 ± 8.34e−03U>0.05
(Strehl ratio)(0.001–0.01)(0.002–0.042)

MTF8.39e−02 ± 1.81e−020.1 ± 3.06e−02t>0.05
(A/D)(0.065–0.121)(0.075–0.193)

HOA = higher-order aberrations; HOAst = high-order astigmatism; PSF = point spread function; MTF = modulation transfer function; DALK = deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (fluid dissection); PKP = penetrating keratoplasty; t = T-test; U = Mann–Whitney U test. is statistically significant.