Review Article

Pediatric Posttraumatic Endophthalmitis in China for Twenty Years

Table 3

Comparison of characteristics of posttraumatic endophthalmitis cases between 1994–2003 and 2004–2013.

1994–20032004–2013

Time from injury to presentation
 Number of articles reporting8 (260 cases)6 (220 cases)
 Mean time13.4 days6.4 days<0.001
Causative agents
 Number of articles9 (234 cases)7 (236 cases)
 Disposable syringe needle135 (57.7%)52 (22%)<0.001
Initial visual acuity0.369
 Number of articles reporting9 (268 cases)9 (169 cases)
 NLP and LP113 (42.2%)62 (36.7%)
 HM and CF116 (43.3%)75 (44.4%)
 ≥5/20039 (14.5%)32 (18.9%)
Final visual acuity0.042
 Number of articles reporting11 (306 cases)8 (218 cases)
20/20098 (32.0%)56 (25.7%)
 ≥5/200 and <20/20058 (18.9%)59 (27.0%)
 <5/200150 (49.0%)93 (42.6%)
 Phthisis bulbi32 (10.4%)17 (7.8%)0.036
<0.001
 Number of articles reporting5 (142 cases)5 (171 cases)
39 (27.5%)0 (0%)
17 (12.0%)65 (38.0%)
 Vitrectomy86 (60.5%)106 (61.9%)

those articles in which all cases of endophthalmitis were treated with PPV.
Treated with intravenous and topical antibiotics alone.
those treated with vitrectomy after initial treatment with intravitreal antibiotics.
NLP: no light perception; LP: light perception; HM: hand movements; CF: counting fingers.