Clinical Study

Corneal Clarity and Visual Outcomes after Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction and Comparison to Femtosecond Laser-Assisted In Situ Keratomileusis

Table 1

SMILE versus FS-LASIK—demographics, preoperative, and surgery data.

GroupsSMILEFS-LASIK

Patients3333
Total eyes (right/left)30/2828/30
Gender (M/F)15/1813/20
Mean age (y)38 ± 10 (23 to 56)37 ± 10 (23 to 52)0.086
Mean SE (D)−5.76 ± 1.80 (−9.5 to −2.0)−5.03 ± 2.32 (−9.88 to −0.5)0.108
Mean cylinder (D)−0.99 ± 0.90 (−4.25 to 0)−0.95 ± 0.94 (−5.0 to 0)0.982
White to white (mm)12.2 ± 0.3 (11.4 to 12.9)12.2 ± 0.3 (11.8 to 12.8)0.340
Surgery data
Mean SE of the correction (D)−5.51 ± 1.86 (−9.50 to −1.75)−4.80 ± 2.4 (−10.0 to −0.8)0.136
Mean cylinder of the correction (D)−0.86 ± 0.94 (−4.0 to 0)−0.90 ± 0.90 (−4.5 to 0)0.773
Mean flap/cap thickness (μm)119 ± 2 (110 to 120)113 ± 6 (100 to 120)<0.001
Mean flap/cap diameter (mm)7.81 ± 0.07 (7.7 to 8.0)8.35 ± 0.10 (8.0 to 8.5)<0.001
Mean lenticule thickness/ablation depth (μm)116 ± 28 (48 to 172)99 ± 38 (22 to 165)0.017
Mean lenticule/ablation diameter (mm)6.72 ± 0.19 (6.3 to 7.0)6.26 ± 0.21 (6 to 6.50)<0.001

SE: spherical equivalent; D: diopters.