Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume 2017, Article ID 6181405, 8 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/6181405
Research Article

Repeatability and Agreement of Central Corneal Thickness and Keratometry Measurements between Four Different Devices

1Augen- und Laserzentrum Leipzig, Lampestraße 1, 04107 Leipzig, Germany
2Ernst-Abbe-Hochschule Jena, Carl-Zeiß-Promenade 2, 07745 Jena, Germany
3Department of Ophthalmology, Heidelberg University, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany

Correspondence should be addressed to Laszlo Kiraly; moc.liamg@ylarikl

Received 10 November 2016; Revised 5 January 2017; Accepted 19 January 2017; Published 5 March 2017

Academic Editor: David P. Piñero

Copyright © 2017 Laszlo Kiraly et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. M. R. Santhiago, N. T. Giacomin, D. Smadja, and S. J. Bechara, “Ectasia risk factors in refractive surgery,” Clinical Ophthalmology, vol. 10, pp. 713–720, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. W. Haigis, “Occurrence of erroneous anterior chamber depth in the SRK/T formula,” Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 442–446, 1993. View at Google Scholar
  3. Z. Tajbakhsh, R. Salouti, M. H. Nowroozzadeh, M. Aghazadeh-Amiri, S. Tabatabaee, and M. Zamani, “Comparison of keratometry measurements using the Pentacam HR, the Orbscan IIz, and the TMS-4 topographer,” Ophthalmic & Physiological Optics, vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 539–546, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. A. Wegener and H. Laser-Junga, “Photography of the anterior eye segment according to Scheimpflug’s principle: options and limitations - a review,” Clinical & Experimental Ophthalmology, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 144–154, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. M. W. Marsich and M. A. Bullimore, “The repeatability of corneal thickness measures,” Cornea, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 792–795, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  6. Y. Barkana, Y. Gerber, U. Elbaz et al., “Central corneal thickness measurement with the Pentacam Scheimpflug system, optical low-coherence reflectometry pachymeter, and ultrasound pachymetry,” Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, vol. 31, no. 9, pp. 1729–1735, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. S. Srivannaboon, C. Chirapapaisan, P. Chonpimai, and S. Loket, “Clinical comparison of a new swept-source optical coherence tomography-based optical biometer and a time-domain optical coherence tomography-based optical biometer,” Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, vol. 41, no. 10, pp. 2224–2232, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. I. Grulkowski, J. J. Liu, J. Y. Zhang et al., “Reproducibility of a long-range swept-source optical coherence tomography ocular biometry system and comparison with clinical biometers,” Ophthalmology, vol. 120, no. 11, pp. 2184–2190, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. J. Huang, K. Pesudovs, D. Wen et al., “Comparison of anterior segment measurements with rotating Scheimpflug photography and partial coherence reflectometry,” Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 341–348, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. C. McAlinden, J. Khadka, and K. Pesudovs, “A comprehensive evaluation of the precision (repeatability and reproducibility) of the Oculus Pentacam HR,” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 52, no. 10, pp. 7731–7737, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. Zeiss, “Cirrus HD-OCT user manual,” Car LZEISS MEDITEC Ag, 2011, https://www.zeiss.com/meditec/int/products/ophthalmology-optometry/glaucoma/diagnostics/oct/oct-optical-coherence-tomography/cirrus-hd-oct.html#downloads View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  12. S. Schallhorn, M. Brown, J. Venter, D. Teenan, K. Hettinger, and H. Yamamoto, “Early clinical outcomes of wavefront-guided myopic LASIK treatments using a new-generation Hartmann-Shack aberrometer,” Journal of Refractive Surgery, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 14–21, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. Y. Mejia and J. C. Galeano, “Corneal topographer based on the Hartmann test,” Optometry and Vision Science, vol. 86, no. 4, pp. 370–381, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  14. L. N. Thibos, W. Wheeler, and D. Horner, “Power vectors: an application of Fourier analysis to the description and statistical analysis of refractive error,” Optometry and Vision Science, vol. 74, no. 6, pp. 367–375, 1997. View at Google Scholar
  15. J. M. Bland and D. G. Altman, “Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement,” Lancet, vol. 1, no. 8476, pp. 307–310, 1986. View at Google Scholar
  16. A. J. Kanellopoulos and G. Asimellis, “Comparison of high-resolution Scheimpflug and high-frequency ultrasound biomicroscopy to anterior-segment OCT corneal thickness measurements,” Clinical Ophthalmology, vol. 7, pp. 2239–2247, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. S. Chen, J. Huang, D. Wen, W. Chen, D. Huang, and Q. Wang, “Measurement of central corneal thickness by high-resolution Scheimpflug imaging, Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography and ultrasound pachymetry,” Acta Ophthalmologica, vol. 90, no. 5, pp. 449–455, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. A. Yu, W. Zhao, G. Savini et al., “Evaluation of central corneal thickness using corneal dynamic Scheimpflug analyzer Corvis ST and comparison with Pentacam rotating Scheimpflug system and ultrasound pachymetry in normal eyes,” Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 2015, Article ID 767012, 8 pages, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. S. A. Read, M. J. Collins, D. R. Iskander, and B. A. Davis, “Corneal topography with Scheimpflug imaging and videokeratography: comparative study of normal eyes,” Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 1072–1081, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. G. Prakash, D. Srivastava, and S. Choudhuri, “A novel Hartman Shack-based topography system: repeatability and agreement for corneal power with Scheimpflug+Placido topographer and rotating prism auto-keratorefractor,” International Ophthalmology, vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 869–880, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. J. Dong, M. Tang, Y. Zhang et al., “Comparison of anterior segment biometric measurements between Pentacam HR and IOLMaster in normal and high myopic eyes,” PloS One, vol. 10, no. 11, Article ID e0143110, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. Q. Wang, G. Savini, K. J. Hoffer et al., “A comprehensive assessment of the precision and agreement of anterior corneal power measurements obtained using 8 different devices,” PloS One, vol. 7, no. 9, Article ID e45607, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus