Clinical Study

Visual Outcomes, Quality of Vision, and Quality of Life of Diffractive Multifocal Intraocular Lens Implantation after Myopic Laser In Situ Keratomileusis: A Prospective, Observational Case Series

Table 4

Binocular visual acuity at the last visit.

ParameterAll (23 patients)Unilateral implantation (19 patients)Bilateral implantation (4 patients) value
Mean Snellen equivalentMean ± SD (LogMAR)Range (LogMAR)Mean Snellen EquivalentMean ± SD (LogMAR)Range (LogMAR)Mean Snellen EquivalentMean ± SD (LogMAR)Range (LogMAR)

UDVA20/20−0.12, 0.1820/20−0.12, 0.1820/210.00, 0.100.425
CDVA20/17−0.12, 0.0020/16−0.12, 0.0020/19−0.12, 0.100.122
Mesopic CDVA20/17−0.12, 0.0020/17−0.12, 0.0020/20−0.12, 0.100.094
UIVA20/24−0.13, 0.3320/23−0.13, 0.2720/30−0.03, 0.330.165
DCIVA20/25−0.13, 0.4320/24−0.13, 0.2920/360.13, 0.430.018
UNVA20/27−0.08, 0.3420/26−0.08, 0.3420/290.08, 0.320.684
DCNVA20/26−0.02, 0.3220/26−0.02, 0.3220/260.02, 0.280.775

Comparison between unilateral and bilateral implantation.
CDVA = corrected distance visual acuity; DCIVA = distance-corrected intermediate visual acuity; DCNVA = distance corrected near visual acuity; LogMAR = logarithm of minimum angle of resolution; UDVA = uncorrected distance visual acuity; UIVA = uncorrected intermediate visual acuity; UNVA = uncorrected near visual acuity.