Capability of Ophthalmology Residents to Detect Glaucoma Using High-Dynamic-Range Concept versus Color Optic Disc Photography

Table 3

Comparison of averaged sensitivity of RNFL defect detection between C-DP and HDR-DP in each quadrant of the glaucoma group.

Area	Method	Mean ± SD	Mean difference ± SD; (95% CI)	value of mean difference
Nasal	C-DP	72.0 ± 9.2	10.0 ± 16.3; (−1.7, 21.7)	0.085
	HDR-DP	62.0 ± 14.8
Superonasal	C-DP	58.0 ± 7.9	3.0 ± 6.7; (−1.8, 7.8)	0.193
	HDR-DP	55.0 ± 9.7
Superotemporal	C-DP	59.0 ± 17.9	7.0 ± 18.9; (−6.5, 20.5)	0.271
	HDR-DP	52.0 ± 11.4
Temporal	C-DP	78.0 ± 4.2	6.0 ± 11.7; (−2.4, 14.4)	0.140
	HDR-DP	72.0 ± 10.3
Inferotemporal	C-DP	41.0 ± 16.6	−6.0 ± 22.7; (−22.2, 10.2)	0.425
	HDR-DP	47.0 ± 17.0
Inferonasal	C-DP	57.0 ± 15.7	1.0 ± 13.7; (−8.8, 10.8)	0.823
	HDR-DP	56.0 ± 15.1

Mean difference is the comparison of each item between HDR-DP and C-DP (HDR − C).