Applying a New Automated Perimetry Pattern Based on the Stimulus Distribution of the Multifocal ERG to Improve Structure-Function Investigation in Glaucoma

Table 3

In this comparison of the G2 and the mf103 pattern, the overall means and standard deviation (±SD) values from both visual field patterns (dB) are given for POAG and controls.

Group	MD		MD103	MS		MS103	sLV		sLV103
POAG ()	3.47 ± 4.0		3.95 ± 3.8	23.3 ± 4.2		23.6 ± 4.0	4.6 ± 2.7		4.8 ± 2.9
Controls ()	0.13 ± 1.7		0.59 ± 1.5	27.2 ± 1.8		27.5 ± 1.6	2.0 ± 0.5		2.2 ± 0.6
POAG versus controls

For the G2 pattern, MD: mean defect; MS: mean sensitivity; and sLV: squared loss of variance; for the mf103 pattern, MD, MS, and sLV are marked with 103. values are adjusted to age and gender. Italicized values compare the different field patterns, and upright values compare between POAG and control for each individual pattern.