Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume 2017, Article ID 8914623, 8 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/8914623
Review Article

The Effect of Corneal Refractive Surgery on Glaucoma

University Eye Clinic, University Hospital of Alexandroupolis, 68131 Alexandroupolis, Greece

Correspondence should be addressed to Vassilios Kozobolis; rg.htud.dem@opmozokv

Received 12 November 2016; Accepted 9 March 2017; Published 9 April 2017

Academic Editor: Antonio M. Fea

Copyright © 2017 Vassilios Kozobolis et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. Y. C. Tham, X. Li, T. Y. Wong, H. A. Quigley, T. Aung, and C. Y. Cheng, “Global prevalence of glaucoma and projections of glaucoma burden through 2040: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” Ophthalmology, vol. 121, no. 11, pp. 2081–2090, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. M. C. Leske, B. Nemesure, Q. He, S. Y. Wu, J. Fielding Hejtmancik, and A. Hennis, “Patterns of open-angle glaucoma in the Barbados family study,” Ophthalmology, vol. 108, no. 6, pp. 1015–1022, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. R. C. Wolfs, C. C. Klaver, R. S. Ramrattan, C. M. van Duijn, A. Hofman, and P. T. de Jong, “Genetic risk of primary open-angle glaucoma. Population-based familial aggregation study,” Archives of Ophthalmology, vol. 116, no. 12, pp. 1640–1645, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  4. M. C. Leske, S. Y. Wu, A. Hennis, R. Honkanen, B. Nemesure, and BESs Study Group, “Risk factors for incident open-angle glaucoma: the Barbados eye studies,” Ophthalmology, vol. 115, no. 1, pp. 85–93, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. M. O. Gordon, J. A. Beiser, J. D. Brandt et al., “The ocular hypertension treatment study: baseline factors that predict the onset of primary open-angle glaucoma,” Archives of Ophthalmology, vol. 120, no. 6, pp. 714–712, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  6. S. Asrani, R. Zeimer, J. Wilensky, D. Gieser, S. Vitale, and K. Lindenmuth, “Large diurnal fluctuations in intraocular pressure are an independent risk factor in patients with glaucoma,” Journal of Glaucoma, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 134–142, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  7. A. L. Williams, S. Gatla, B. E. Leiby et al., “The value of intraocular pressure asymmetry in diagnosing glaucoma,” Journal of Glaucoma, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 215–218, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. L. Xu, Y. Wang, S. Wang, Y. Wang, and J. B. Jonas, “High myopia and glaucoma susceptibility the Beijing eye study,” Ophthalmology, vol. 114, no. 2, pp. 216–220, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. B. L. Lee, “Wilson MR; ocular hypertension treatment study (OHTS). Ocular hypertension treatment study (OHTS) commentary,” Current Opinion in Ophthalmology, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 74–77, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. A. L. Coleman and S. Miglior, “Risk factors for glaucoma onset and progression,” Survey of Ophthalmology, vol. 53, Supplement 1, pp. S3–10, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. J. M. Tielsch, A. Sommer, J. Katz, R. M. Royall, H. A. Quigley, and J. Javitt, “Racial variations in the prevalence of primary open-angle glaucoma. The Baltimore eye survey,” Jama., vol. 266, no. 3, pp. 369–374, 1991. View at Google Scholar
  12. E. Aghaian, J. E. Choe, S. Lin, and R. L. Stamper, “Central corneal thickness of Caucasians, Chinese, Hispanics, Filipinos, African Americans, and Japanese in a glaucoma clinic,” Ophthalmology, vol. 111, no. 12, pp. 2211–2219, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. R. Ritch, “Exfoliation syndrome,” Current Opinion in Ophthalmology, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 124–130, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. V. P. Kozobolis, “Epidemiology of pseudoexfoliation in the island of Crete (Greece),” Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica, vol. 75, no. 6, pp. 726–729, 1997. View at Google Scholar
  15. A. G. Konstas, D. A. Mantziris, and W. C. Stewart, “Diurnal intraocular pressure in untreated exfoliation and primary open-angle glaucoma,” Archives of Ophthalmology, vol. 115, no. 2, pp. 182–185, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  16. Y. Siddiqui, R. D. Ten Hulzen, J. D. Cameron, D. O. Hodge, and D. H. Johnson, “What is the risk of developing pigmentary glaucoma from pigment dispersion syndrome?” American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 135, no. 6, pp. 794–799, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. N. S. Jabbur, S. Tuli, I. S. Barequet, and T. P. O'Brien, “Outcomes of laser in situ keratomileusis in patients with pigment dispersion syndrome,” Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 110–114, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. M. Paciuc, C. F. Velasco, and R. Naranjo, “Acute angle-closure glaucoma after hyperopic laser in situ keratomileusis,” Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 620–623, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. K. P. Bashford, G. Shafranov, S. Tauber, and M. B. Shields, “Considerations of glaucoma in patients undergoing corneal refractive surgery,” Survey of Ophthalmology, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 245–251, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. European Glaucoma Prevention Study (EGPS) Group, S. Miglior, N. Pfeiffer et al., “Predictive factors for open-angle glaucoma among patients with ocular hypertension in the European glaucoma prevention study,” Ophthalmology, vol. 114, no. 1, pp. 3–9, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. F. Badalà, K. Nouri-Mahdavi, D. A. Raoof, N. Leeprechanon, S. K. Law, and J. Caprioli, “Optic disk and nerve fiber layer imaging to detect glaucoma,” American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 144, no. 5, pp. 724–732, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. L. M. Zangwill, J. Williams, C. C. Berry, S. Knauer, and R. N. Weinreb, “A comparison of optical coherence tomography and retinal nerve fiber layer photography for detection of nerve fiber layer damage in glaucoma,” Ophthalmology, vol. 107, no. 7, pp. 1309–1315, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. J. E. Deleón-Ortega, S. N. Arthur, G. McGwin Jr, A. Xie, B. E. Monheit, and C. A. Girkin, “Discrimination between glaucomatous and nonglaucomatous eyes using quantitative imaging devices and subjective optic nerve head assessment,” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 47, no. 8, pp. 3374–3380, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. M. J. Greaney, D. C. Hoffman, D. F. Garway-Heath, M. Nakla, A. L. Coleman, and J. Caprioli, “Comparison of optic nerve imaging methods to distinguish normal eyes from those with glaucoma,” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 140–145, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  25. J. L. Hernández-Verdejo, L. de Benito-Llopis, and M. A. Teus, “Comparison of real-time intraocular pressure during laser in situ keratomileusis and epithelial laser in situ keratomileusis in porcine eyes,” Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 477–482, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. N. Kasetsuwan, R. T. Pangilinan, L. L. Moreira et al., “Real time intraocular pressure and lamellar corneal flap thickness in keratomileusis,” Cornea, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 41–44, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. C. T. Dollery, P. Henkind, E. M. Kohner, and J. W. Paterson, “Effect of raised intraocular pressure on the retinal and choroidal circulation,” Investigative Ophthalmology, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 191–198, 1968. View at Google Scholar
  28. T. M. McCarty, D. R. Hardten, N. J. Anderson, K. Rosheim, and T. W. Samuelson, “Evaluation of neuroprotective qualities of brimonidine during LASIK,” Ophthalmology, vol. 110, no. 8, pp. 1615–1625, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. M. Iester, P. Tizte, and A. Mermoud, “Retinal nerve fiber layer thickness changes after an acute increase in intraocular pressure,” Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, vol. 28, no. 12, pp. 2117–2122, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. J. Y. Nevyas, H. J. Nevyas, and A. Nevyas-Wallace, “Change in retinal nerve fiber layer thickness after laser in situ keratomileusis,” Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, vol. 28, no. 12, pp. 2123–2128, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. J. T. Whitson, J. P. McCulley, H. D. Cavanagh, J. Song, R. W. Bowman, and L. Hertzog, “Effect of laser in situ keratomileusis on optic nerve head topography and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness,” Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, vol. 29, no. 12, pp. 2302–2305, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. T. V. Roberts, M. A. Lawless, C. M. Rogers, G. L. Sutton, and Y. Domniz, “The effect of laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis on retinal nerve fiber layer measurements obtained with scanning laser polarimetry,” Journal of Glaucoma, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 173–176, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  33. P. Sony, R. Sihota, N. Sharma, A. Sharma, and R. B. Vajpayee, “Influence of LASIK on retinal nerve fiber layer thickness,” Journal of Refractive Surgery, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 303–305, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  34. R. Gürses-Ozden, M. E. Pons, C. Barbieri et al., “Scanning laser polarimetry measurements after laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis,” American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 129, no. 4, pp. 461–464, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. A. P. Aristeidou, G. Labiris, E. I. Paschalis, N. C. Foudoulakis, S. C. Koukoula, and V. P. Kozobolis, “Evaluation of the retinal nerve fiber layer measurements after PRK and LASIK, using scanning laser polarimetry (GDX VCC). Effect of laser in situ keratomileusis on retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measurements by scanning laser polarimetry,” Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, vol. 248, no. 5, pp. 731–736, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. M. Tóth and G. Holló, “Evaluation of enhanced corneal compensation in scanning laser polarimetry: comparison with variable corneal compensation on human eyes undergoing LASIK,” Journal of Glaucoma, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 53–59, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  37. S. R. Montezuma, S. Lessell, and R. Pineda, “Optic neuropathy after epi-LASIK,” Journal of Refractive Surgery, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 204–208, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  38. A. G. Lee, T. Kohnen, R. Ebner et al., “Optic neuropathy associated with laser in situ keratomileusis,” Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, vol. 26, no. 11, pp. 1581–1584, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. B. D. Cameron, N. A. Saffra, and M. B. Strominger, “Laser in situ keratomileusis-induced optic neuropathy,” Ophthalmology, vol. 108, no. 4, pp. 660–665, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. K. C. Chan, A. Poostchi, T. Wong, E. A. Insull, N. Sachdev, and A. P. Wells, “Visual field changes after transient elevation of intraocular pressure in eyes with and without glaucoma,” Ophthalmology, vol. 115, no. 4, pp. 667–672, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. H. S. Weiss, R. S. Rubinfeld, and J. F. Anderschat, “Case reports and small case series: LASIK-associated visual field loss in a glaucoma suspect,” Archives of Ophthalmology, vol. 119, no. 5, pp. 774–775, 2001. View at Google Scholar
  42. D. M. Bushley, V. C. Parmley, and P. Paglen, “Visual field defect associated with laser in situ keratomileusis,” American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 129, no. 5, pp. 668–671, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. R. Montés-Micó and T. Ferrer-Blasco, “Contrast sensitivity loss in the peripheral visual field following laser in situ keratomileusis,” Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 1120–1122, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. S. M. Brown and J. Morales, “Iatrogenic ring scotoma after laser in situ keratomileusis,” Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, vol. 28, no. 10, pp. 1860–1863, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. H. Goldmann, “Applanation tonometry,” Glaucoma Transactions of the Second Conference, Josiah Mercy Jr. Foundation, New York, 1957. View at Google Scholar
  46. M. J. Doughty and M. L. Zaman, “Human corneal thickness and its impact on intraocular pressure measures: a review and meta-analysis approach,” Survey of Ophthalmology, vol. 44, no. 5, pp. 367–408, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. C. Tamburrelli, A. Giudiceandrea, A. S. Vaiano, C. G. Caputo, F. Gullà, and T. Salgarello, “Underestimate of tonometric readings after photorefractive keratectomy increases at higher intraocular pressure levels,” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 46, no. 9, pp. 3208–3213, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. O. E. Abbasoglu, R. W. Bowman, H. D. Cavanagh, and J. P. McCulley, “Reliability of intraocular pressure measurements after myopic excimer photorefractive keratectomy,” Ophthalmology, vol. 105, no. 12, pp. 2193–2196, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  49. D. H. Chang and R. D. Stulting, “Change in intraocular pressure measurements after LASIK the effect of the refractive correction and the lamellar flap,” Ophthalmology, vol. 112, no. 6, pp. 1009–1016, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. J. M. Schallhorn, S. C. Schallhorn, and Y. Ou, “Factors that influence intraocular pressure changes after myopic and hyperopic LASIK and photorefractive keratectomy: a large population study,” Ophthalmology, vol. 122, no. 3, pp. 471–479, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. M. Kohlhaas, E. Spoerl, A. G. Boehm, and K. Pollack, “A correction formula for the real intraocular pressure after LASIK for the correction of myopic astigmatism,” Journal of Refractive Surgery, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 263–267, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  52. E. Chihara, H. Takahashi, K. Okazaki, M. Park, and M. Tanito, “The preoperative intraocular pressure level predicts the amount of underestimated intraocular pressure after LASIK for myopia,” The British Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 89, no. 2, pp. 160–164, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. Q. Fan, J. Zhang, L. Zheng, H. Feng, and H. Wang, “Intraocular pressure change after myopic laser in situ keratomileusis as measured on the central and peripheral cornea,” Clinical & Experimental Optometry, vol. 95, no. 4, pp. 421–426, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. M. A. El Danasoury, A. El Maghraby, and S. J. Coorpender, “Change in intraocular pressure in myopic eyes measured with contact and non-contact tonometers after laser in situ keratomileusis,” Journal of Refractive Surgery, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 97–104, 2001. View at Google Scholar
  55. D. Zadok, D. B. Tran, M. Twa, M. Carpenter, and D. J. Schanzlin, “Pneumotonometry versus Goldmann tonometry after laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia,” Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, vol. 25, no. 10, pp. 1344–1348, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  56. Y. Levy, D. Zadok, Y. Glovinsky, D. Krakowski, and P. Nemet, “Tono-Pen versus Goldmann tonometry after excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy,” Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 486–491, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  57. I. Schipper, P. Senn, K. Oyo-Szerenyi, and R. Peter, “Central and peripheral pressure measurements with the Goldmann tonometer and Tono-Pen after photorefractive keratectomy for myopia,” Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 929–933, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  58. H. J. Garzozi, H. S. Chung, Y. Lang, L. Kagemann, and A. Harris, “Intraocular pressure and photorefractive keratectomy: a comparison of three different tonometers,” Cornea, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 33–36, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  59. H. J. Park, K. B. Uhm, and C. Hong, “Reduction in intraocular pressure after laser in situ keratomileusis,” Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 303–309, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  60. A. P. Aristeidou, G. Labiris, A. Katsanos, M. Fanariotis, N. C. Foudoulakis, and V. P. Kozobolis, “Comparison between Pascal dynamic contour tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometer after different types of refractive surgery,” Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, vol. 249, no. 5, pp. 767–773, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  61. J. S. Pepose, S. K. Feigenbaum, M. A. Qazi, J. P. Sanderson, and C. J. Roberts, “Changes in corneal biomechanics and intraocular pressure following LASIK using static, dynamic, and noncontact tonometry,” American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 143, no. 1, pp. 39–47, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  62. H. Burvenich, E. Burvenich, and C. Vincent, “Dynamic contour tonometry (DCT) versus non-contact tonometry (NCT): a comparison study,” Bulletin de la Société Belge d'Ophtalmologie, vol. 298, pp. 63–69, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  63. D. S. Siganos, G. I. Papastergiou, and C. Moedas, “Assessment of the Pascal dynamic contour tonometer in monitoring intraocular pressure in unoperated eyes and eyes after LASIK,” Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 746–751, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  64. W. Lau and D. Pye, “A clinical description of ocular response analyzer measurements,” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 52, no. 6, pp. 2911–2916, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  65. S. Chen, D. Chen, J. Wang, F. Lu, Q. Wang, and J. Qu, “Changes in ocular response analyzer parameters after LASIK,” Journal of Refractive Surgery, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 279–288, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  66. J. Shin, T. W. Kim, S. J. Park, M. Yoon, and J. W. Lee, “Changes in biomechanical properties of the cornea and intraocular pressure after myopic laser in situ keratomileusis using a femtosecond laser for flap creation determined using ocular response analyzer and Goldmann applanation tonometry,” Journal of Glaucoma, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 195–201, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  67. C. Kirwan and M. O'Keefe, “Measurement of intraocular pressure in LASIK and LASEK patients using the Reichert ocular response analyzer and Goldmann applanation tonometry,” Journal of Refractive Surgery, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 366–370, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  68. A. Frings, S. J. Linke, E. L. Bauer, V. Druchkiv, T. Katz, and J. Steinberg, “Effects of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) on corneal biomechanical measurements with the Corvis ST tonometer,” Clinical Ophthalmology, vol. 9, pp. 305–311, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  69. J. Hong, J. Xu, A. Wei et al., “A new tonometer-the Corvis ST tonometer: clinical comparison with noncontact and Goldmann applanation tonometers,” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 659–665, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  70. H. Hashemi, S. Asgari, M. Mortazavi, and R. Ghaffari, “Evaluation of corneal biomechanics after excimer laser corneal refractive surgery in high myopic patients using dynamic Scheimpflug technology,” Eye & Contact Lens, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  71. J. L. Ramos, S. Zhou, C. Yo, M. Tang, and D. Huang, “High-resolution imaging of complicated LASIK flap interface fluid syndrome,” Ophthalmic Surgery, Lasers & Imaging, vol. 39, 4 Supplement, pp. S80–S82, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  72. S. Goto, S. Koh, R. Toda et al., “Interface fluid syndrome after laser in situ keratomileusis following herpetic keratouveitis,” Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, vol. 39, no. 8, pp. 1267–1270, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  73. W. A. Lyle, G. J. Jin, and Y. Jin, “Interface fluid after laser in situ keratomileusis,” Journal of Refractive Surgery, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 455–459, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  74. R. Fogla, S. K. Rao, and P. Padmanabhan, “Interface fluid after laser in situ keratomileusis,” Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, vol. 27, no. 9, pp. 1526–1528, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  75. S. Senthil, V. Rathi, and C. Garudadri, “Misleading Goldmann applanation tonometry in a post-LASIK eye with interface fluid syndrome,” Indian Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 58, no. 4, pp. 333–335, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  76. M. T. Pham, R. E. Peck, and K. R. Dobbins, “Nonarteritic ischemic optic neuropathy secondary to severe ocular hypertension masked by interface fluid in a post-LASIK eye,” Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 955–957, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  77. U. Rehany, V. Bersudsky, and S. Rumelt, “Paradoxical hypotony after laser in situ keratomileusis,” Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, vol. 26, no. 12, pp. 1823–1826, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  78. J. Najman-Vainer, R. J. Smith, and R. K. Maloney, “Interface fluid after LASIK: misleading tonometry can lead to end-stage glaucoma,” Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 471–472, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  79. N. M. Shaikh, S. Shaikh, K. Singh, and E. Manche, “Progression to end-stage glaucoma after laser in situ keratomileusis,” Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 356–359, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  80. J. P. Kersey and D. C. Broadway, “Corticosteroid-induced glaucoma: a review of the literature,” Eye (London, England), vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 407–416, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  81. V. Galvis, A. Tello, M. L. Revelo, and P. Valarezo, “Post-LASIK edema-induced keratopathy (PLEK), a new name based on pathophysiology of the condition,” BMJ Case Reports, vol. 2012, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  82. M. W. Belin, S. B. Hannush, C. W. Yau, and R. L. Schultze, “Elevated intraocular pressure-induced interlamellar stromal keratitis,” Ophthalmology, vol. 109, no. 10, pp. 1929–1933, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  83. A. Galal, A. Artola, J. Belda et al., “Interface corneal edema secondary to steroid-induced elevation of intraocular pressure simulating diffuse lamellar keratitis,” Journal of Refractive Surgery, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 441–447, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  84. J. Frucht-Pery, D. Landau, F. Raiskup et al., “Early transient visual acuity loss after LASIK due to steroid-induced elevation of intraocular pressure,” Journal of Refractive Surgery, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 244–251, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  85. G. S. Polunin, V. V. Kourenkov, I. A. Makarov, and E. G. Polunina, “The corneal barrier function in myopic eyes after laser in situ keratomileusis and after photorefractive keratectomy in eyes with haze formation,” Journal of Refractive Surgery, vol. 15, 2 Supplement, pp. S221–S224, 1999. View at Google Scholar
  86. H. S. Chung and R. S. Feder, “Pupil response to tropicamide following laser in situ keratomileusis,” Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 553–556, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  87. N. Hamada, S. Amano, S. Yamagami et al., “Change in corneal permeability to timolol after laser in situ keratomileusis and photorefractive keratectomy in rabbit,” Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 12–14, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  88. Z. Z. Nagy, A. Szabó, R. R. Krueger, and I. Süveges, “Treatment of intraocular pressure elevation after photorefractive keratectomy,” Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, vol. 27, no. 7, pp. 1018–1024, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  89. M. Vetrugno, A. Maino, G. M. Quaranta, and L. Cardia, “A randomized, comparative open-label study on the efficacy of latanoprost and timolol in steroid induced ocular hypertension after photorefractive keratectomy,” European Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 205–211, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  90. B. Bengtsson and A. Heijl, “A long-term prospective study of risk factors for glaucomatous visual field loss in patients with ocular hypertension,” Journal of Glaucoma, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 135–138, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus