Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume 2018, Article ID 1345409, 12 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/1345409
Research Article

Mapping the Structure-Function Relationship in Glaucoma and Healthy Patients Measured with Spectralis OCT and Humphrey Perimetry

1Ophthalmology Service, University Hospital Ramón y Cajal, School of Medicine and Health Science, University of Alcalá, IRYCIS, Hospital Ramón y Cajal, Ctra. Colmenar Viejo km. 9100, 28034 Madrid, Spain
2Ophthalmology Service, University Hospital Ramón y Cajal, IRYCIS, Hospital Ramón y Cajal, Ctra. Colmenar Viejo km. 9100, 28034 Madrid, Spain

Correspondence should be addressed to Laia Jaumandreu; moc.nsm@uerdnamuajaial

Received 3 November 2017; Revised 15 February 2018; Accepted 1 March 2018; Published 17 April 2018

Academic Editor: Paolo Fogagnolo

Copyright © 2018 Laia Jaumandreu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. L. A. Kerrigan-Baumrind, H. A. Quigley, M. E. Pease, D. F. Kerrigan, and R. S. Mitchell, “Number of ganglion cells in glaucoma eyes compared with threshold visual field tests in the same persons,” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 741–748, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  2. A. S. Raza, X. Zhang, C. G. V. de Moraes et al., “Improving glaucoma detection using spatially correspondent clusters of damage and by combining standard automated perimetry and optical coherence tomography,” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 612–624, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. A. J. Tatham, R. N. Weinreb, and F. A. Medeiros, “Strategies for improving early detection of glaucoma: the combined structure–function index,” Clinical Ophthalmology, vol. 8, pp. 611–621, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. R. Zeimer, S. Asrani, S. Zou, H. Quigley, and H. Jampel, “Quantitative detection of glaucomatous damage at the posterior pole by retinal thickness mapping. A pilot study,” Ophthalmology, vol. 105, no. 2, pp. 224–231, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. C. K. S. Leung, W. M. Chan, W. H. Yung et al., “Comparison of macular and peripapillary measurements for the detection of glaucoma: an optical coherence tomography study,” Ophthalmology, vol. 112, no. 3, pp. 391–400, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. F. A. Medeiros, L. M. Zangwill, C. Bowd, R. M. Vessani, R. Susanna Jr., and R. N. Weinreb, “Evaluation of retinal nerve fiber layer, optic nerve head, and macular thickness measurements for glaucoma detection using optical coherence tomography,” American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 139, no. 1, pp. 44–55, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. W. Boling, D. WuDunn, L. B. Cantor, J. Hoop, M. James, and V. Nukala, “Correlation between macular thickness and glaucomatous visual fields,” Journal of Glaucoma, vol. 21, no. 8, pp. 505–509, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. F. N. Kanadani, D. C. Hood, T. M. Grippo et al., “Structural and functional assessment of the macular region in patients with glaucoma,” The British Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 90, no. 11, pp. 1393–1397, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. K. Mathers, J. A. Rosdahl, and S. Asrani, “Correlation of macular thickness with visual fields in glaucoma patients and suspects,” Journal of Glaucoma, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. e98–104, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. D. S. Greenfield, H. Bagga, and R. W. Knighton, “Macular thickness changes in glaucomatous optic neuropathy detected using optical coherence tomography,” Archives of Ophthalmology, vol. 121, no. 1, pp. 41–46, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  11. Y. Nakatani, T. Higashide, S. Ohkubo, H. Takeda, and K. Sugiyama, “Evaluation of macular thickness and peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness for detection of early glaucoma using spectral domain optical coherence tomography,” Journal of Glaucoma, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 252–259, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. J. M. Kim, K. R. Sung, Y. C. Yoo, and C. Y. Kim, “Point-wise relationships between visual field sensitivity and macular thickness determined by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography,” Current Eye Research, vol. 38, no. 8, pp. 894–901, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. T. Rolle, L. Manerba, P. Lanzafame, and F. M. Grignolo, “Diagnostic power of macular retinal thickness analysis and structure-function relationship in glaucoma diagnosis using SPECTRALIS OCT,” Current Eye Research, vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 667–675, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. L. T. Chylack Jr., J. K. Wolfe, D. M. Singer et al., “The lens opacities classification system III,” Archives of Ophthalmology, vol. 111, no. 6, pp. 831–836, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. A. Tuulonen and P. J. Airaksinen, “Initial glaucomatous optic disk and retinal nerve fiber layer abnormalities and their progression,” American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 111, no. 4, pp. 485–490, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. A. Ferreras, L. E. Pablo, D. F. Garway-Heath, P. Fogagnolo, and J. García-Feijoo, “Mapping standard automated perimetry to the peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer in glaucoma,” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 49, no. 7, pp. 3018–3025, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. T. Alasil, K. Wang, F. Yu et al., “Correlation of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness and visual fields in glaucoma: a broken stick model,” American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 157, no. 5, pp. 953–959.e2, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. A. Heijl, A. Lindgren, and G. Lindgren, “Test-retest variability in glaucomatous visual fields,” American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 108, no. 2, pp. 130–135, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. B. C. Chauhan and C. A. Johnson, “Test-retest variability of frequency-doubling perimetry and conventional perimetry in glaucoma patients and normal subjects,” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 648–656, 1999. View at Google Scholar
  20. M. P. J. Wand and M. C. Jones, “Kernel smoothing,” in Monographs on Statistics and Applied Probability, pp. 97–103, Chapman & Hall, London, UK, 1995. View at Google Scholar
  21. S. Kim, J. Y. Lee, S. O. Kim, and M. S. Kook, “Macular structure–function relationship at various spatial locations in glaucoma,” The British Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 99, no. 10, pp. 1412–1418, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. M. Gonzalez-Hernandez, L. E. Pablo, K. Armas-Dominguez, R. R. de la Vega, A. Ferreras, and M. G. de la Rosa, “Structure–function relationship depends on glaucoma severity,” The British Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 93, no. 9, pp. 1195–1199, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. R. Malik, W. H. Swanson, and D. F. Garway-Heath, “‘Structure–function relationship’ in glaucoma: past thinking and current concepts,” Clinical & Experimental Ophthalmology, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 369–380, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. B. Monsalve, A. Ferreras, A. P. Khawaja et al., “The relationship between structure and function as measured by OCT and Octopus perimetry,” The British Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 99, no. 9, pp. 1230–1235, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. K. R. Sung, G. Wollstein, N. R. Kim et al., “Macular assessment using optical coherence tomography for glaucoma diagnosis,” The British Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 96, no. 12, pp. 1452–1455, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. V. Guedes, J. S. Schuman, E. Hertzmark et al., “Optical coherence tomography measurement of macular and nerve fiber layer thickness in normal and glaucomatous human eyes,” Ophthalmology, vol. 110, no. 1, pp. 177–189, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. M. Tanito, N. Itai, A. Ohira, and E. Chihara, “Reduction of posterior pole retinal thickness in glaucoma detected using the retinal thickness analyzer,” Ophthalmology, vol. 111, no. 2, pp. 265–275, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. O. Tan, V. Chopra, A. T. H. Lu et al., “Detection of macular ganglion cell loss in glaucoma by Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography,” Ophthalmology, vol. 116, no. 12, pp. 2305–2314.e2, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. Y. Kotera, M. Hangai, F. Hirose, S. Mori, and N. Yoshimura, “Three-dimensional imaging of macular inner structures in glaucoma by using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography,” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 1412–1421, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. J. S. Jeong, M. G. Kang, C. Y. Kim, and N. R. Kim, “Pattern of macular ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer defect generated by spectral-domain OCT in glaucoma patients and normal subjects,” Journal of Glaucoma, vol. 24, no. 8, pp. 583–590, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. D. C. Hood, P. Thienprasiddhi, V. C. Greenstein et al., “Detecting early to mild glaucomatous damage: a comparison of the multifocal VEP and automated perimetry,” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 492–498, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. A. Anton, N. Yamagishi, L. Zangwill, P. A. Sample, and R. N. Weinreb, “Mapping structural to functional damage in glaucoma with standard automated perimetry and confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy,” American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 125, no. 4, pp. 436–446, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. C. Ajtony, Z. Balla, S. Somoskeoy, and B. Kovacs, “Relationship between visual field sensitivity and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness as measured by optical coherence tomography,” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 258–263, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. G. Wollstein, L. Kagemann, R. A. Bilonick et al., “Retinal nerve fibre layer and visual function loss in glaucoma: the tipping point,” The British Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 96, no. 1, pp. 47–52, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. D. F. Garway-Heath, J. Caprioli, F. W. Fitzke, and R. A. Hitchings, “Scaling the hill of vision: the physiological relationship between light sensitivity and ganglion cell numbers,” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 41, no. 7, pp. 1774–1782, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  36. D. F. Garway-Heath, M. J. Greaney, and J. Caprioli, “Correction for the erroneous compensation of anterior segment birefringence with the scanning laser polarimeter for glaucoma diagnosis,” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 1465–1474, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  37. P. J. Airaksinen and H. I. Alanko, “Effect of retinal nerve fibre loss on the optic nerve head configuration in early glaucoma,” Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, vol. 220, no. 4, pp. 193–196, 1983. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. A. J. Vingrys, K. A. Helfrich, and G. Smith, “The role that binocular vision and stereopsis have in evaluating fundus features,” Optometry and Vision Science, vol. 71, no. 8, pp. 508–515, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. R. S. Harwerth and H. A. Quigley, “Visual field defects and retinal ganglion cell losses in patients with glaucoma,” Archives of Ophthalmology, vol. 124, no. 6, pp. 853–859, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. N. Drasdo, K. E. Mortlock, and R. V. North, “Ganglion cell loss and dysfunction: relationship to perimetric sensitivity,” Optometry and Vision Science, vol. 85, no. 11, pp. 1036–1042, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. D. C. Hood, A. S. Raza, C. G. V. de Moraes, J. M. Liebmann, and R. Ritch, “Glaucomatous damage of the macula,” Progress in Retinal and Eye Research, vol. 32, pp. 1–21, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. R. S. Parikh, S. R. Parikh, G. C. Sekhar, S. Prabakaran, J. G. Babu, and R. Thomas, “Normal age-related decay of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness,” Ophthalmology, vol. 114, no. 5, pp. 921–926, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. T. Alasil, K. Wang, P. A. Keane et al., “Analysis of normal retinal nerve fiber layer thickness by age, sex, and race using spectral domain optical coherence tomography,” Journal of Glaucoma, vol. 22, no. 7, pp. 532–541, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. H. Hirasawa, A. Tomidokoro, M. Araie et al., “Peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness determined by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography in ophthalmologically normal eyes,” Archives of Ophthalmology, vol. 128, no. 11, pp. 1420–1426, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. P. G. D. Spry and C. A. Johnson, “Senescent changes of the normal visual field: an age-old problem,” Optometry and Vision Science, vol. 78, no. 6, pp. 436–441, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus