Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume 2018, Article ID 3923170, 8 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/3923170
Research Article

Fitting Tips and Visual Rehabilitation of Irregular Cornea with a New Design of Corneoscleral Contact Lens: Objective and Subjective Evaluation

Mansoura Ophthalmology Center, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt

Correspondence should be addressed to Waleed Ali Abou Samra; moc.oohay@armasubard

Received 13 August 2017; Revised 7 December 2017; Accepted 17 December 2017; Published 1 February 2018

Academic Editor: Antonio Benito

Copyright © 2018 Waleed Ali Abou Samra et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. D. Guindolet, A. Petrovic, S. Doan, I. Cochereau, and E. E. Gabison, “Sclerocorneal intrastromal lamellar keratoplasty for pellucid marginal degeneration,” Cornea, vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 900–903, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. A. Mularoni, A. Torreggiani, A. di Biase, G. L. Laffi, and G. Tassinari, “Conservative treatment of early and moderate pellucid marginal degeneration: a new refractive approach with intracorneal rings,” Ophthalmology, vol. 112, no. 4, pp. 660–666, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. L. O. Gittins-Nuñez, E. Díaz Del Castillo-Martín, I. Huerta-Albañil, R. Ríos-Prado, and M. A. Soto-Dávila, “Risk factors and rejection frequency in patients undergoing penetrating keratoplasty,” Revista Medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 190–195, 2016. View at Google Scholar
  4. R. Shetty, M. Kurian, D. Anand, P. Mhaske, K. M. Narayana, and B. K. Shetty, “Intacs in advanced keratoconus,” Cornea, vol. 27, no. 9, pp. 1022–1029, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. W. A. Abou Samra, D. S. El-Emam, and M. A. Kasem, “Clinical performance of a spherical hybrid lens design in high regular astigmatism,” Eye & Contact Lens, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. Y. F. Abdalla, A. F. Elsahn, K. M. Hammersmith, and E. J. Cohen, “SynergEyes lenses for keratoconus,” Cornea, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 5–8, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. M. Garcia-Lledo, C. Feinbaum, and J. L. Alio, “Contact lens fitting in keratoconus,” Comprehensive Ophthalmology Update, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 47–52, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  8. E. Maguen, P. Caroline, I. R. Rosner, J. I. Macy, and A. B. Nesburn, “The use of the SoftPerm lens for the correction of irregular astigmatism,” Eye & Contact Lens, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 173–176, 1992. View at Google Scholar
  9. A. C. Nau, “A comparison of synergeyes versus traditional rigid gas permeable lens designs for patients with irregular corneas,” Eye & Contact Lens, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 198–200, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. D. Opačić, S. Miljak, and K. Ćuruvija-Opačić, “The level of improvement of visual acuity in high corneal astigmatism with rigid gas permeable contact lenses,” Collegium Antropologicum, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 229–232, 2015. View at Google Scholar
  11. L. B. Szczotka-Flynn and S. Patel, “Menicon Z rigid gas permeable lenses for keratoconus and irregular corneas: a retrospective case series,” Eye & Contact Lens, vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 254–260, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  12. F. J. Fernandez-Velazquez, “Kerasoft IC compared to Rose-K in the management of corneal ectasias,” Contact Lens & Anterior Eye, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 175–179, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. F. Alipour, F. Rahimi, M. N. Hashemian, Z. Ajdarkosh, R. Roohipoor, and M. Mohebi, “Mini-scleral contact lens for management of poor visual outcomes after intrastromal corneal ring segments implantation in keratoconus,” Journal of Ophthalmic & Vision Research, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 252–257, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. V. M. Rathi, P. S. Mandathara, M. Taneja, S. Dumpati, and V. S. Sangwan, “Scleral lens for keratoconus: technology update,” Clinical Ophthalmology, vol. 9, pp. 2013–2018, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. B. de Luis Eguileor, J. Etxebarria Ecenarro, A. Santamaria Carro, and R. Feijoo Lera, “Irregular corneas: improve visual function with scleral contact lenses,” Eye & Contact Lens, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. G. A. d. N. Rocha, P. O. B. Miziara, A. C. V. de Castro, and A. A. d. N. Rocha, “Visual rehabilitation using mini-scleral contact lenses after penetrating keratoplasty,” Arquivos Brasileiros de Oftalmologia, vol. 80, no. 1, pp. 17–20, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. P. Yan, M. Kapasi, R. Conlon et al., “Patient comfort and visual outcomes of mini-scleral contact lenses,” Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 69–73, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. E. Porcar, J. C. Montalt, E. España-Gregori, and C. Peris-Martínez, “Corneo-scleral contact lens in a piggyback system for keratoconus: a case report,” Contact Lens & Anterior Eye, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 190–194, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. E. Maguen, M. Martinez, I. R. Rosner, P. Caroline, J. Macy, and A. B. Nesburn, “The use of Saturn II lenses in keratoconus,” Eye & Contact Lens, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 41–43, 1991. View at Google Scholar
  20. J. Liu, N. E. Leach, and J. P. G. Bergmanson, “Reverse-geometry gas-permeable lens design for pellucid marginal degeneration,” Eye & Contact Lens, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 127–129, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. R. Martin and G. Rodriguez, “Reverse geometry contact lens fitting after corneal refractive surgery,” Journal of Refractive Surgery, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 753–756, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  22. G. Tan, X. Chen, R. Z. Xie et al., “Reverse geometry rigid gas permeable contact lens wear reduces high-order aberrations and the associated symptoms in post-LASIK patients,” Current Eye Research, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 9–16, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. E. van der Worp, D. Bornman, D. L. Ferreira, M. Faria-Ribeiro, N. Garcia-Porta, and J. M. González-Meijome, “Modern scleral contact lenses: a review,” Contact Lens & Anterior Eye, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 240–250, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. A. Z. Crawford, J. J. Meyer, D. V. Patel, S. E. Ormonde, and C. N. J. McGhee, “Complications related to sutures following penetrating and deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty,” Clinical & Experimental Ophthalmology, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 142-143, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. R. Limaiem, A. Chebil, A. Baba, N. Ben Youssef, F. Mghaieth, and L. El Matri, “Pediatric penetrating keratoplasty: indications and outcomes,” Transplantation Proceedings, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 649–651, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. E. Guilbert, J. Bullet, O. Sandali, E. Basli, L. Laroche, and V. M. Borderie, “Long-term rejection incidence and reversibility after penetrating and lamellar keratoplasty,” American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 155, no. 3, pp. 560–569.e2, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. J. Feuerstacke, O. Hellwinkel, I. Naydis, S. Linke, and M. Klemm, “Astigmatism after keratoplasty: influence of orthotopic transplantation,” Der Ophthalmologe, vol. 111, no. 9, pp. 846–852, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. M. Romero-Jiménez and P. Flores-Rodríguez, “Utility of a semi-scleral contact lens design in the management of the irregular cornea,” Contact Lens & Anterior Eye, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 146–150, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. W. B. Stason, M. Razavi, D. S. Jacobs et al., “Clinical benefits of the Boston ocular surface prosthesis,” American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 149, no. 1, pp. 54–61.e2, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. A. M. Betts, G. L. Mitchell, and K. Zadnik, “Visual performance and comfort with the Rose K lens for keratoconus,” Optometry and Vision Science, vol. 79, no. 8, pp. 493–501, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  31. A. K. Jain and J. Sukhija, “Rose-K contact lens for keratoconus,” Indian Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 121–125, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  32. P. Mandathara Sudharman, V. Rathi, and S. Dumapati, “Rose K lenses for keratoconus—an Indian experience,” Eye & Contact Lens, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 220–222, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. E. Porcar, E. España, J. C. Montalt, J. I. Benlloch-Fornés, and C. Peris-Martínez, “Post-LASIK visual quality with a corneoscleral contact lens to treat irregular corneas,” Eye & Contact Lens, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 46–50, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. G. Gemoules and K. M. Morris, “Rigid gas-permeable contact lenses and severe higher-order aberrations in postsurgical corneas,” Eye & Contact Lens, vol. 33, 6, Part 1 of 2, pp. 304–307, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. G. Tan, J. Yang, X. Chen, H. He, and X. Zhong, “Changes in wave-front aberrations after rigid gas permeable contact lens fitting in post—laser in situ keratomileusis patients with visual complaints,” Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 264–268, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. I. Ortenberg, S. Behrman, W. Geraisy, and I. S. Barequet, “Wearing time as a measure of success of scleral lenses for patients with irregular astigmatism,” Eye & Contact Lens, vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 381–384, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. M. Barnett, V. Lien, J. Y. Li, B. Durbin-Johnson, and M. J. Mannis, “Use of scleral lenses and miniscleral lenses after penetrating keratoplasty,” Eye & Contact Lens, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 185–189, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. C. W. Chung, R. Santim, W. J. Heng, and E. J. Cohen, “Use of SoftPerm contact lenses when rigid gas permeable lenses fail,” Eye & Contact Lens, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 202–208, 2001. View at Google Scholar
  39. O. Segal, Y. Barkana, D. Hourovitz et al., “Scleral contact lenses may help where other modalities fail,” Cornea, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 308–310, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. T. Romero-Rangel, P. Stavrou, J. Cotter, P. Rosenthal, S. Baltatzis, and C. S. Foster, “Gas-permeable scleral contact lens therapy in ocular surface disease,” American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 130, no. 1, pp. 25–32, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus