Journal of Ophthalmology

Research Article

Fitting Tips and Visual Rehabilitation of Irregular Cornea with a New Design of Corneoscleral Contact Lens: Objective and Subjective Evaluation

Table 5

Aberrometric parameters and mesopic vision testing results (mean ± SD) before and after fitting with Rose K2 XL lenses during follow-up periods.


Parameter	Prefitting	Postfitting
Parameter	Prefitting	2 weeks	value^a	3 months	value^b	6 months	value^c

Contrast Sensitivity (%)	41.6% ±7.2⁽¹⁾	81.9% ±5.9⁽²⁾	<0.001	83.7% ±5.2⁽²⁾	<0.001	83.9% ±6.1⁽²⁾	<0.001
Glare (%)	39.6% ±6.9⁽¹⁾	69.9% ±6.2⁽²⁾	<0.001	71.1% ±6.4⁽²⁾	<0.001	71.9% ±6.9⁽²⁾	<0.001
Total RMS	4.9 ± 1.55⁽¹⁾	2.2 ± 0.62⁽²⁾	<0.001	2.1 ± 0.59⁽²⁾	<0.001	2.00 ± 0.60⁽²⁾	<0.001
HOA RMS	1.2 ± 0.57⁽¹⁾	0.34 ± 0.27⁽²⁾	<0.001	0.34 ± 0.23⁽²⁾	<0.001	0.33 ± 0.21⁽²⁾	<0.001

Total RMS: total root mean square; HOA RMS: high order aberration root mean square. Postfitting values (a, b, and c) derived from posthoc analysis. ^aComparing 2 weeks after CL with prefitting values. ^bComparing 3 months after CL with prefitting values. ^cComparing 6 months after CL with prefitting values. ¹Without contact lenses or glasses. ²With contact lens. Significant at .