Research Article
Fitting Tips and Visual Rehabilitation of Irregular Cornea with a New Design of Corneoscleral Contact Lens: Objective and Subjective Evaluation
Table 9
Patient self-assessed mean subjective ratings before and 6 months after fitting with Rose K2 XL (mean ± SD).
| Parameter | Prefitting | Postfitting | value |
| Clarity of vision | 2.17 ± 1.1 | 4.2 ± 0.92 | 0.003 | Patient satisfaction | 2.1 ± 1.3 | 4.47 ± 0.75 | 0.002 | Visual fluctuation | 3.23 ± 0.98 | 1.1 ± 0.33 | 0.01 | Glare | 2.66 ± 0.81 | 1.13 ± 0.75 | 0.008 | Halo | 3.67 ± 1.41 | 1.51 ± 0.66 | 0.005 | Starburst | 3.22 ± 0.57 | 0.94 ± 0.59 | 0.002 | Diplopia | 0.98 ± 0.59 | 0.73 ± 0.47 | 0.06 | Activity limitations | 4.13 ± 1.53 | 1.28 ± 0.78 | <0.001 | Far spectacle dependence | 4.67 ± 0.99 | 0.83 ± 0.55 | <0.001 | Near spectacle dependence | 3.33 ± 1.77 | 2.68 ± 1.43 | 0.05 |
|
|
Activities: includes reading, driving, playing games, cooking, and watching the TV. |