Clinical Study

Comparison of Two Toric IOLs with Different Haptic Design: Optical Quality after 1 Year

Table 3

Changes from the baseline to the month 12 visit.

ChangesAT TORBI IOLTecnis toric IOL
Mean ± SDRangeMean ± SDRange

Spherical error (D)2.39 ± 2.73−1.25–13.002.15 ± 2.59−1.25–14.000.61
SE (D)2.18 ± 2.46−1.12–11.622.02 ± 2.35−1.00–12.500.73
J0 (D)0.43 ± 0.50−0.50–1.950.47 ± 0.52−0.37–1.720.64
J45 (D)0.45 ± 0.48−0.36–1.450.34 ± 0.50−0.50–2.250.20
SIA (D)0.45 ± 0.250.12–1.080.44 ± 0.310.06–1.650.92
Corneal SA (um)0.03 ± 0.18−0.30–0.900.03 ± 0.62−0.65–1.370.97

SE = spherical equivalent; SA = spherical aberration (central 6 mm); J0 and J45 = cylindrical vectors; SIA = corneal plane surgically induced astigmatism; P = difference between the two groups using generalized estimating equation.