Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume 2018, Article ID 4318405, 10 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/4318405
Review Article

From Presbyopia to Cataracts: A Critical Review on Dysfunctional Lens Syndrome

1Department of Ophthalmology (Qvision), Vithas Virgen del Mar Hospital, 04120 Almería, Spain
2Department of Ophthalmology, Torrecárdenas Hospital Complex, 04009 Almería, Spain
3Department of Optics, Pharmacology and Anatomy, University of Alicante, Alicante, Spain
4Department of Ophthalmology (OFTALMAR), Vithas Medimar International Hospital, Alicante, Spain

Correspondence should be addressed to David P. Piñero; se.au@oreynip.divad

Received 12 February 2018; Accepted 5 June 2018; Published 27 June 2018

Academic Editor: Antonio Queiros

Copyright © 2018 Joaquín Fernández et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. D. S. Durrie and M. Moshifar, “Dysfunctional lens syndrome,” in Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of ISRS, Pursuit of Perfection. Section II: Intraocular Refractive Surgery Topics, Chicago, IL, USA, 2016.
  2. G. O. Waring, K. M. Rocha, D. S. Durrie, and V. M. Thompson, “Use of dysfunctional lens syndrome grading to guide decision making in the surgical correction of presbyopia,” in Proceedings of the ASCRS Meeting, Los Ángeles, CA, USA, 2017.
  3. W. N. Charman, “Developments in the correction of presbyopia I: spectacle and contact lenses,” Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 8–29, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. J. A. Martínez-Roda, M. Vilaseca, J. C. Ondategui et al., “Double-pass technique and compensation-comparison method in eyes with cataract,” Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, vol. 42, no. 10, pp. 1461–1469, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. V. M. Thompson, G. O. Waring, D. S. Durrie et al., “Adaptation of the diagnosis of presbyopia to the modern refractive cataract patient: dysfunctional lens syndrome,” in Proceedings of the ASCRS Meeting, Los Ángeles, CA, USA, 2017.
  6. R. S. Chuck, D. S. Jacobs, J. K. Lee et al., “Refractive errors & refractive surgery preferred practice pattern®,” Ophthalmology, vol. 125, no. 1, pp. P1–P104, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. R. J. Olson, R. Braga-Mele, S. H. Chen et al., “Cataract in the adult eye preferred practice pattern®,” Ophthalmology, vol. 124, no. 1, pp. P1–P119, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. A. L. Petrou and A. Terzidaki, “A meta-analysis and review examining a possible role for oxidative stress and singlet oxygen in diverse diseases,” Biochemical Journal, vol. 474, no. 16, pp. 2713–2731, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. M. G. Nye-Wood, J. M. Spraggins, R. M. Caprioli, K. L. Schey, P. J. Donaldson, and A. C. Grey, “Spatial distributions of glutathione and its endogenous conjugates in normal bovine lens and a model of lens aging,” Experimental Eye Research, vol. 154, pp. 70–78, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. A. C. Grey, N. J. Demarais, B. J. West, and P. J. Donaldson, “A quantitative map of glutathione in the aging human lens,” International Journal of Mass Spectrometry, 2017, In press. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. P. J. Donaldson, A. C. Grey, B. Maceo Heilman, J. C. Lim, and E. Vaghefi, “The physiological optics of the lens,” Progress in Retinal and Eye Research, vol. 56, pp. e1–e24, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. G. Smith, M. J. Cox, R. Calver, and L. F. Garner, “The spherical aberration of the crystalline lens of the human eye,” Vision Research, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 235–243, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. P. Artal, E. Berrio, A. Guirao, and P. Piers, “Contribution of the cornea and internal surfaces to the change of ocular aberrations with age,” Journal of the Optical Society of America A, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 137–143, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  14. J. L. Alió, P. Schimchak, H. P. Negri, and R. Montés-Micó, “Crystalline lens optical dysfunction through aging,” Ophthalmology, vol. 112, no. 11, pp. 2022–2029, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. S. Amano, Y. Amano, S. Yamagami et al., “Age-related changes in corneal and ocular higher-order wavefront aberrations,” American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 137, no. 6, pp. 988–992, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. R. Navarro, “The optical design of the human eye: a critical review,” Journal of Optometry, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 3–18, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. C. Qiu, B. Maceo Heilman, J. Kaipio, P. Donaldson, and E. Vaghefi, “Fully automated laser ray tracing system to measure changes in the crystalline lens GRIN profile,” Biomedical Optics Express, vol. 8, no. 11, p. 4947, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. D. Siedlecki, A. de Castro, E. Gambra et al., “Distortion correction of OCT images of the crystalline lens,” Optometry and Vision Science, vol. 89, no. 5, pp. E709–E718, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. B. Moffat, D. A. Atchison, and J. M. Pope, “Age-related changes in refractive index distribution and power of the human lens as measured by magnetic resonance micro-imaging in vitro,” Vision Research, vol. 42, no. 13, pp. 1683–1693, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. R. C. Augusteyn, C. E. Jones, and J. M. Pope, “Age-related development of a refractive index plateau in the human lens: evidence for a distinct nucleus,” Clinical and Experimental Optometry, vol. 91, no. 3, pp. 296–301, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. N. Sachdev, S. E. Ormonde, T. Sherwin, and C. N. J. McGhee, “Higher-order aberrations of lenticular opacities,” Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, vol. 30, no. 8, pp. 1642–1648, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. K. M. Rocha, W. Nosé, K. Bottós, J. Bottós, L. Morimoto, and E. Soriano, “Higher-order aberrations of age-related cataract,” Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, vol. 33, no. 8, pp. 1442–1446, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. J. Lee, M. J. Kim, and H. Tchah, “Higher-order aberrations induced by nuclear cataract,” Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, vol. 34, no. 12, pp. 2104–2109, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. J. H. Lee, H. G. Choo, and S. W. Kim, “Spherical aberration reduction in nuclear cataracts,” Graefe’s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, vol. 254, no. 6, pp. 1127–1133, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. C.-Z. Wu, H. Jin, Z.-N. Shen, Y.-J. Li, and X. Cui, “Wavefront aberrations and retinal image quality in different lenticular opacity types and densities,” Scientific Reports, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 15247, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. F. Faria-Correia, B. Lopes, T. Monteiro, N. Franqueira, and R. Ambrósio, “Scheimpflug lens densitometry and ocular wavefront aberrations in patients with mild nuclear cataract,” Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 405–411, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. T. Kuroda, T. Fujikado, and N. MaedaT. Oshika, Y. Hirohara, and T. Mihashi, “Wavefront analysis in eyes with nuclear or cortical cataract,” American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 134, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. X. Zhu, H. Ye, W. He, J. Yang, J. Dai, and Y. Lu, “Objective functional visual outcomes of cataract surgery in patients with good preoperative visual acuity,” Eye, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 452–459, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. T. Ritschel, M. Ihrke, J. R. Frisvad, J. Coppens, K. Myszkowski, and H.-P. Seidel, “Temporal glare: real-time dynamic simulation of the scattering in the human eye,” Computer Graphics Forum, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 183–192, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. T. J. T. P. van den Berg, “Intraocular light scatter, reflections, fluorescence and absorption: what we see in the slit lamp,” Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 6–25, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. P. W. T. De Waard, J. K. Ijspeert, T. J. Van den Berg, and P. T. de Jong, “Intraocular light scattering in age-related cataracts,” Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 618–625, 1992. View at Google Scholar
  32. T. Tanaka and G. B. Benedek, “Observation of protein diffusivity in intact human and bovine lenses with application to cataract,” Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 449–456, 1975. View at Google Scholar
  33. G. B. Benedek, L. T. Chylack, T. Libondi, P. Magnante, and M. Pennett, “Quantitative detection of the molecular changes associated with early cataractogenesis in the living human lens using quasielastic light scattering,” Current Eye Research, vol. 6, no. 12, pp. 1421–1432, 1987. View at Google Scholar
  34. R. Xu, “Light scattering: a review of particle characterization applications,” Particuology, vol. 18, pp. 11–21, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. M. B. Datiles, R. R. Ansari, K. I. Suh et al., “Clinical detection of precataractous lens protein changes using dynamic light scattering,” Archives of Ophthalmology, vol. 126, no. 12, pp. 1687–1693, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. M. B. Datiles, R. R. Ansari, J. Yoshida et al., “Longitudinal study of age-related cataract using dynamic light scattering,” Ophthalmology, vol. 123, no. 2, pp. 248–254, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. A. B. Watson and J. I. Yellott, “A unified formula for light-adapted pupil size,” Journal of Vision, vol. 12, no. 10, pp. 1–16, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. H. Namba, R. Kawasaki, A. Sugano et al., “Age-related changes in ocular aberrations and the Yamagata study (Funagata),” Cornea, vol. 36, pp. 34–40, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. E. Bellot, V. Coizet, J. Warnking, K. Knoblauch, E. Moro, and M. Dojat, “Effects of aging on low luminance contrast processing in humans,” NeuroImage, vol. 139, pp. 415–426, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. C. Owsley, “Vision and aging,” Annual Review of Vision Science, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 255–271, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. P. Artal, S. Manzanera, K. Komar, A. Gambín-Regadera, and M. Wojtkowski, “Visual acuity in two-photon infrared vision,” Optica, vol. 4, no. 12, p. 1488, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. O. Reid, D. A. L. Maberley, and H. Hollands, “Comparison of the potential acuity meter and the visometer in cataract patients,” Eye, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 195–199, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. T. Bal, T. Coeckelbergh, J. Van Looveren, J. J. Rozema, and M.-J. Tassignon, “Influence of cataract morphology on straylight and contrast sensitivity and its relevance to fitness to drive,” Ophthalmologica, vol. 225, no. 2, pp. 105–111, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. European Coalition of Optometry and Optics (ECOO), Visual Standards for Driving in Europe. A Consensus Paper, 2017, http://www.ecoo.info/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Visual-Standards-for-Driving-in-Europe-Consensus-Paper-January-2017....pdf.
  45. L. J. van Rijn, C. Nischler, R. Michael et al., “Prevalence of impairment of visual function in European drivers,” Acta Ophthalmologica, vol. 89, no. 2, pp. 124–131, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. C. Owsley, B. T. Stalvey, J. Wells, M. E. Sloane, and G. McGwin, “Visual risk factors for crash involvement in older drivers with cataract,” Archives of Ophthalmology, vol. 119, no. 6, pp. 881–887, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  47. J. A. Kimlin, A. A. Black, and J. M. Wood, “Nighttime driving in older adults: effects of glare and association with mesopic visual function,” Investigative Opthalmology and Visual Science, vol. 58, no. 5, pp. 2796–2803, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. J. Zhao, F. Xiao, H. Zhao, Y. Dai, and Y. Zhang, “Effect of higher-order aberrations and intraocular scatter on contrast sensitivity measured with a single instrument,” Biomedical Optics Express, vol. 8, no. 4, p. 2138, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. F. Faria-Correia, I. Ramos, B. Lopes, T. Monteiro, N. Franqueira, and R. Ambrósio, “Correlations of objective metrics for quantifying dysfunctional lens syndrome with visual acuity and phacodynamics,” Journal of Refractive Surgery, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 79–83, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. D. R. Nixon, “Preoperative cataract grading by Scheimpflug imaging and effect on operative fluidics and phacoemulsification energy,” Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 242–246, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. D. S. Grewal, G. S. Brar, and S. P. S. Grewal, “Correlation of nuclear cataract lens density using Scheimpflug images with lens opacities classification system III and visual function,” Ophthalmology, vol. 116, no. 8, pp. 1436–1443, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. A. Pan, Q. Wang, F. Huang, J.-H. Huang, F.-J. Bao, and A.-Y. Yu, “Correlation among lens opacities classification system III grading, visual function index-14, pentacam nucleus staging, and objective scatter index for cataract assessment,” American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 159, no. 2, pp. 241.e2–247.e2, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. F. Faria-Correia, I. Ramos, B. Lopes, T. Monteiro, N. Franqueira, and R. Ambrósio, “Comparison of dysfunctional lens index and Scheimpflug lens densitometry in the evaluation of age-related nuclear cataracts,” Journal of Refractive Surgery, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 244–248, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. N. Y. Makhotkina, T. T. J. M. Berendschot, F. J. H. M. van den Biggelaar, A. R. H. Weik, and R. M. M. A. Nuijts, “Comparability of subjective and objective measurements of nuclear density in cataract patients,” Acta Ophthalmologica, 2018, In press. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. Y.-C. Chang, K. Liu, C. de Freitas et al., “Assessment of eye length changes in accommodation using dynamic extended-depth OCT,” Biomedical Optics Express, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 2709–2719, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  56. P. Gifford and H. A. Swarbrick, “Repeatability of internal aberrometry with a aberrometer/corneal topographer,” Optometry and Vision Science, vol. 89, no. 6, pp. 929–938, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  57. N. Visser, T. T. J. M. Berendschot, F. Verbakel, A. N. Tan, J. de Brabander, and R. M. M. A. Nuijts, “Evaluation of the comparability and repeatability of four wavefront aberrometers,” Investigative Opthalmology and Visual Science, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 1302–1311, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  58. J. Hao, L. Li, F. Tian, and H. Zhang, “Comparison of two types of visual quality analyzer for the measurement of high order aberrations,” International Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 292–297, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  59. J. B. Won, S. W. Kim, E. K. Kim, B. J. Ha, and T.-I. Kim, “Comparison of internal and total optical aberrations for 2 aberrometers: iTrace and OPD scan,” Korean Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 210–213, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  60. P. Artal, A. Benito, G. M. Pérez et al., “An objective scatter index based on double-pass retinal images of a point source to classify cataracts,” PLoS One, vol. 6, no. 2, Article ID e16823, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  61. L. Qiao, X. Wan, X. Cai et al., “Comparison of ocular modulation transfer function determined by a ray-tracing aberrometer and a double-pass system in early cataract patients,” Chinese Medical Journal, vol. 127, no. 19, pp. 3454–3458, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  62. F. Díaz-Doutón, A. Benito, J. Pujol, M. Arjona, J. L. Guell, and P. Artal, “Comparison of the retinal image quality with a Hartmann–Shack wavefront sensor and a double-pass instrument,” Investigative Opthalmology and Visual Science, vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 1710–1716, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  63. M. Vilaseca, M. J. Romero, M. Arjona et al., “Grading nuclear, cortical and posterior subcapsular cataracts using an objective scatter index measured with a double-pass system,” British Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 96, no. 9, pp. 1204–1210, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  64. J. A. Martínez-Roda, M. Vilaseca, J. C. Ondategui et al., “Optical quality and intraocular scattering in a healthy young population,” Clinical and Experimental Optometry, vol. 94, no. 2, pp. 223–229, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  65. F. Galliot, S. R. Patel, and B. Cochener, “Objective scatter index: working toward a new quantification of cataract?” Journal of Refractive Surgery, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 96–102, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  66. C. Paz, R. F. Sánchez, E. Colombo, M. Vilaseca, J. Pujol, and L. A. Issolio, “Discrimination between surgical and nonsurgical nuclear cataracts based on ROC analysis,” Current Eye Research, vol. 39, no. 12, pp. 1187–1193, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  67. H. Zhang and J. Wang, “Visual quality assessment of posterior capsule opacification using optical quality analysis system (OQAS),” Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 2017, Article ID 9852195, 4 pages, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  68. C. Paz Filgueira, R. F. Sánchez, L. A. Issolio, and E. M. Colombo, “Straylight and visual quality on early nuclear and posterior subcapsular cataracts,” Current Eye Research, vol. 41, no. 9, pp. 1209–1215, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  69. F. Cabot, A. Saad, C. McAlinden, N. M. Haddad, A. Grise-Dulac, and D. Gatinel, “Objective assessment of crystalline lens opacity level by measuring ocular light scattering with a double-pass system,” American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 155, no. 4, pp. 629.e2–635.e2, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  70. B. Cochener, S. R. Patel, and F. Galliot, “Correlational analysis of objective and subjective measures of cataract quantification,” Journal of Refractive Surgery, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 104–109, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  71. A. Crnej, N. Hirnschall, C. Petsoglou, and O. Findl, “Methods for assessing forward and backward light scatter in patients with cataract,” Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, vol. 43, no. 8, pp. 1072–1076, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  72. Y. Chen, X. Wang, C. D. Zhou, and Q. Wu, “Evaluation of visual quality of spherical and aspherical intraocular lenses by optical quality analysis system,” International Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 914–918, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  73. C. W. Park, H. Kim, and C. K. Joo, “Assessment of optical quality at different contrast levels in pseudophakic eyes,” Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 2016, Article ID 4247973, 8 pages, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  74. R. Jiménez, A. Valero, J. Fernández, R. G. Anera, and J. R. Jiménez, “Optical quality and visual performance after cataract surgery with biaxial microincision intraocular lens implantation,” Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, vol. 42, no. 7, pp. 1022–1028, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  75. H. Lee, K. Lee, J. M. Ahn, E. K. Kim, B. Sgrignoli, and T.-I. Kim, “Double-pass system assessing the optical quality of pseudophakic eyes,” Optometry and Vision Science, vol. 91, no. 4, pp. 437–443, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  76. T. Chen, F. Yu, H. Lin et al., “Objective and subjective visual quality after implantation of all optic zone diffractive multifocal intraocular lenses: a prospective, case-control observational study,” British Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 100, no. 11, pp. 1530–1535, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  77. H. Lee, K. Lee, J. M. Ahn, E. K. Kim, B. Sgrignoli, and T.-I. Kim, “Evaluation of optical quality parameters and ocular aberrations in multifocal intraocular lens implanted eyes,” Yonsei Medical Journal, vol. 55, no. 5, pp. 1413–1420, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  78. F. Vega, M. S. Millán, N. Vila-Terricabras, and F. Alba-Bueno, “Visible versus near-infrared optical performance of diffractive multifocal intraocular lenses,” Investigative Opthalmology and Visual Science, vol. 56, no. 12, p. 7345, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  79. D. Gatinel, “Double pass-technique limitations for evaluation of optical performance after diffractive IOL implantation,” Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 621-622, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  80. M. Jabbarvand, H. Hashemian, M. Khodaparast, M. Jouhari, A. Tabatabaei, and S. Rezaei, “Endophthalmitis occurring after cataract surgery: outcomes of more than 480,000 cataract surgeries, epidemiologic features, and risk factors,” Ophthalmology, vol. 123, no. 2, pp. 295–301, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  81. C. Creuzot-Garcher, E. Benzenine, A. S. Mariet et al., “Incidence of acute postoperative endophthalmitis after cataract surgery a nationwide study in France from 2005 to 2014,” Ophthalmology, vol. 123, no. 7, pp. 1414–1420, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  82. H. Hashemi, M. Khabazkhoob, F. Rezvan et al., “Complications of cataract surgery in Iran: trend from 2006 to 2010,” Ophthalmic Epidemiology, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 46–52, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  83. C. J. Chu, R. L. Johnston, C. Buscombe, A. B. Sallam, Q. Mohamed, and Y. C. Yang, “Risk factors and incidence of macular edema after cataract surgery a database study of 81984 eyes,” Ophthalmology, vol. 123, no. 2, pp. 316–323, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  84. J. D. Stein, D. S. Grossman, K. M. Mundy, A. Sugar, and F. A. Sloan, “Severe adverse events after cataract surgery among medicare beneficiaries,” Ophthalmology, vol. 118, no. 9, pp. 1716–1723, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  85. T. Ianchulev, D. Litoff, D. Ellinger, K. Stiverson, and M. Packer, “Office-based cataract surgery,” Ophthalmology, vol. 123, no. 4, pp. 723–728, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  86. F. F. Marques, D. M. V. Marques, R. H. Osher, and J. M. Osher, “Fate of anterior capsule tears during cataract surgery,” Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, vol. 32, no. 10, pp. 1638–1642, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  87. A. C. Day, P. H. J. Donachie, J. M. Sparrow, and R. L. Johnston, “The Royal College of Ophthalmologists’ national ophthalmology database study of cataract surgery: report 1, visual outcomes and complications,” Eye, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 552–560, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  88. S. E. Ti, Y. N. Yang, S. S. Lang, and S. P. Chee, “A 5-year audit of cataract surgery outcomes after posterior capsule rupture and risk factors affecting visual acuity,” American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 157, no. 1, pp. 180.e1–185.e1, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  89. P. B. Greenberg, V. L. Tseng, W.-C. Wu et al., “Prevalence and predictors of ocular complications associated with cataract surgery in United States veterans,” Ophthalmology, vol. 118, no. 3, pp. 507–514, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  90. R. Braga-Mele, D. Chang, S. Dewey et al., “Multifocal intraocular lenses: relative indications and contraindications for implantation,” Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 313–322, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  91. C. Palomo-Álvarez and M. C. Puell, “Capacity of straylight and disk halo size to diagnose cataract,” Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, vol. 41, no. 10, pp. 2069–2074, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  92. L. Kessel, J. Andresen, D. Erngaard, P. Flesner, B. Tendal, and J. Hjortdal, “Indication for cataract surgery. Do we have evidence of who will benefit from surgery? A systematic review and meta-analysis,” Acta Ophthalmologica, vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 10–20, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  93. M. Comas, R. Román, F. Cots et al., “Unmet needs for cataract surgery in Spain according to indication criteria. Evaluation through a simulation model,” British Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 92, no. 7, pp. 888–892, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  94. L. Kessel, D. Erngaard, P. Flesner, J. Andresen, and J. Hjortdal, “Do evidence-based guidelines change clinical practice patterns?” Acta Ophthalmologica, vol. 95, no. 4, pp. 337–343, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  95. C. K. Pager, “Expectations and outcomes in cataract surgery. a prospective test of 2 models of satisfaction,” Archives of Ophthalmology, vol. 122, no. 12, pp. 1788–1792, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  96. M. J. Hawker, S. N. Madge, P. A. Baddeley, and S. R. Perry, “Refractive expectations of patients having cataract surgery,” Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, vol. 31, no. 10, pp. 1970–1975, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  97. M. D. Nijkamp, R. M. M. A. Nuijts, B. van den Borne, C. A. B. Webers, F. van der Horst, and F. Hendrikse, “Determinants of patient satisfaction after cataract surgery in 3 settings,” Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, vol. 26, no. 9, pp. 1379–1388, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  98. M. A. Woodward, J. B. Randleman, and R. D. Stulting, “Dissatisfaction after multifocal intraocular lens implantation,” Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 992–997, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  99. N. E. De Vries, C. A. B. Webers, W. R. H. Touwslager et al., “Dissatisfaction after implantation of multifocal intraocular lenses,” Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, vol. 37, no. 5, pp. 859–865, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  100. U. Mester, T. Vaterrodt, F. Goes et al., “Impact of personality characteristics on patient satisfaction after multifocal intraocular lens implantation: results from the “happy patient study”,” Journal of Refractive Surgery, vol. 30, no. 10, pp. 674–678, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  101. D. S. Durrie, “Developing a treatment algorithm for stage 1 dysfunctional lens syndrome,” in Proceedings of the ASCRS Meeting, Los Angeles, CA, USA, May 2017.
  102. J. L. Alió, A. Grzybowski, and D. Romaniuk, “Refractive lens exchange in modern practice: when and when not to do it?” Eye and Vision, vol. 1, no. 1, p. 10, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  103. C. Kirwan, J. M. Nolan, J. Stack, T. C. B. Moore, and S. Beatty, “Determinants of patient satisfaction and function related to vision following cataract surgery in eyes with no visually consequential ocular co-morbidity,” Graefe’s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, vol. 253, no. 10, pp. 1735–1744, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  104. F. Alba-Bueno, N. Garzón, F. Vega, F. Poyales, and M. S. Millán, “Patient-perceived and laboratory-measured halos associated with diffractive bifocal and trifocal intraocular lenses,” Current Eye Research, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 35–42, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  105. A. M. Rosa, Â. C. Miranda, M. Patrício et al., “Functional magnetic resonance imaging to assess the neurobehavioral impact of dysphotopsia with multifocal intraocular lenses,” Ophthalmology, vol. 124, no. 9, pp. 1–10, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  106. F. W. Campbell and D. G. Green, “Optical and retinal factors affecting visual resolution,” Journal of Physiology, vol. 181, no. 3, pp. 576–593, 1965. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  107. M. C. Puell, M. J. Pérez-Carrasco, A. Barrio, B. Antona, and C. Palomo-Alvarez, “Normal values for the size of a halo produced by a glare source,” Journal of Refractive Surgery, vol. 29, no. 9, pp. 618–622, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  108. M. C. Puell, M. J. Pérez-Carrasco, F. J. Hurtado-Ceña, and L. Álvarez-Rementería, “Disk halo size measured in individuals with monofocal versus diffractive multifocal intraocular lenses,” Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, vol. 41, no. 11, pp. 2417–2423, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  109. M. R. Sedaghat, H. Momeni-Moghaddam, S. S. Naroo, H. Ghavamsaeedi, and A. Vahedi, “Dysfunctional lens syndrome,” International Ophthalmology, pp. 1–5, 2017, In press. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  110. M. Mark Packer, Dysfunctional Lens Syndrome Paradox, Ophthalmology Times, New York, NY, USA, 2015, http://ophthalmologytimes.modernmedicine.com/ophthalmologytimes/news/dysfunctional-lens-syndrome-paradox?page=full.
  111. R. Bilbao-Calabuig, F. González-López, F. Amparo, G. Alvarez, S. R. Patel, and F. Llovet-Osuna, “Comparison between mix-and-match implantation of bifocal intraocular lenses and bilateral implantation of trifocal intraocular lenses,” Journal of Refractive Surgery, vol. 32, no. 10, pp. 659–663, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  112. E. Pedrotti, E. Bruni, E. Bonacci, R. Badalamenti, R. Mastropasqua, and G. Marchini, “Comparative analysis of the clinical outcomes with a monofocal and an extended range of vision intraocular lens,” Journal of Refractive Surgery, vol. 32, no. 7, pp. 436–442, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  113. K. Nakamura, H. Bissen-Miyajima, M. Yoshino, and S. Oki, “Visual performance after contralateral implantation of multifocal intraocular lenses with +3.0 and +4.0 diopter additions,” Asia-Pacific Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 329–333, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  114. J. S. M. Chang, J. C. M. Ng, V. K. C. Chan, and A. K. P. Law, “Visual outcomes, quality of vision, and quality of life of diffractive multifocal intraocular lens implantation after myopic laser in situ keratomileusis: a prospective, observational case series,” Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 2017, Article ID 6459504, 12 pages, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus