Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume 2018, Article ID 7321794, 10 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/7321794
Clinical Study

Visual and Refractive Outcomes following Bilateral Implantation of Extended Range of Vision Intraocular Lens with Micromonovision

Nethradhama Superspeciality Eye Hospital, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India

Correspondence should be addressed to Sheetal Brar; ni.oc.oohay@lateehs_rarb

Received 21 August 2017; Revised 8 November 2017; Accepted 6 December 2017; Published 6 February 2018

Academic Editor: Edward Manche

Copyright © 2018 Sri Ganesh et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. S. Cillino, A. Casuccio, F. Di Pace et al., “One-year outcomes with new-generation multifocal intraocular lenses,” Ophthalmology, vol. 115, no. 9, pp. 1508–1516, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. F. G. Faiña, A. M. Palmer, A. E. Albelda, D. N. Saad, M. C. Serrano, and M. C. Céspedes, “Visual function with bilateral implantation of monofocal and multifocal intraocular lenses: a prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial,” Journal of Refractive Surgery, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 257–264, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  3. M. Zeng, Y. Liu, X. Liu et al., “Aberration and contrast sensitivity comparison of aspherical and monofocal and multifocal intraocular lens eyes,” Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 355–360, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. C. Owsley, R. Sekuler, and D. Siemsen, “Contrast sensitivity throughout adulthood,” Vision Research, vol. 23, no. 7, pp. 689–699, 1983. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. A. Guirao, M. Redondo, and P. Artal, “Optical aberrations of the human cornea as a function of age,” Journal of the Optical Society of America A, vol. 17, no. 10, pp. 1697–1702, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. S. Ohtani, K. Miyata, T. Samejima, M. Honbou, and T. Oshika, “Intraindividual comparison of aspherical and spherical intraocular lenses of same material and platform,” Ophthalmology, vol. 116, no. 5, pp. 896–901, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. T. Kasper, J. Bühren, and T. Kohnen, “Visual performance of aspherical and spherical intraocular lenses: intraindividual comparison of visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, and higher-order aberrations,” Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, vol. 32, no. 12, pp. 2022–2029, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. P. Artal, S. Manzanera, P. Piers, and H. Weeber, “Visual effect of the combined correction of spherical and longitudinal chromatic aberrations,” Optics Express, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 1637–1648, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. N. López-Gil and R. Montés-Micó, “New intraocular lens for achromatizing the human eye,” Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, vol. 33, no. 7, pp. 1296–1302, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. H. A. Weeber and P. A. Piers, “Theoretical performance of intraocular lenses correcting both spherical and chromatic aberration,” Journal of Refractive Surgery, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 48–52, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. D. Gatinel and J. Loicq, “Clinically relevant optical properties of bifocal, trifocal, and extended depth of focus intraocular lenses,” Journal of Refractive Surgery, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 273–280, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. G. Labiris, A. Giarmoukakis, and M. Patsiamanidi, “Mini-monovision versus multifocal intraocular lens implantation,” Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 53–57, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. M. Rasp, A. Bachernegg, O. Seyeddain et al., “Bilateral reading performance of 4 multifocal intraocular lens models and a monofocal intraocular lens under bright lighting conditions,” Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, vol. 38, no. 11, pp. 1950–1961, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  14. J. L. Alió, G. Grabner, A. B. Plaza-Puche et al., “Postoperative bilateral reading performance with 4 intraocular lens models: six-month results,” Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, vol. 37, no. 5, pp. 842–852, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. E. Pedrotti, E. Bruni, E. Bonacci, R. Badalamenti, R. Mastropasqua, and G. Marchini, “Comparative analysis of the clinical outcomes with a monofocal and an extended range of vision intraocular lens,” Journal of Refractive Surgery, vol. 32, no. 7, pp. 436–442, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. B. Cochener and for the Concerto Study Group, “Clinical outcomes of a new extended range of vision intraocular lens: International Multicenter Concerto Study,” Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, vol. 42, no. 9, pp. 1268–1275, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. H. D. McKee and V. Jhanji, “Theoretical effect of lens position and corneal curvature on the near focal point of multifocal intraocular lenses,” Journal of Refractive Surgery, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 64–66, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. G. Savini, K. J. Hoffer, and M. Lombardo, “Influence of the effective lens position, as predicted by axial length and keratometry, on the near add power of multifocal intraocular lenses,” Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 44–49, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. D. D. Koch and L. Wang, “Optical quality of three multifocal lenses,” Journal of Refractive Surgery, vol. 32, no. 3, p. 210, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. A. Hamid and A. Sokwala, “A more natural way of seeing: visual performance of three presbyopia correcting intraocular lenses,” Open Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 06, no. 03, pp. 176–183, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  21. S. Richter-Mueksch, H. Weghaupt, C. Skorpik, M. Velikay-Parel, and W. Radner, “Reading performance with a refractive multifocal and a diffractive bifocal intraocular lens,” Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, vol. 28, no. 11, pp. 1957–1963, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. E. Stifter, S. Sacu, H. Weghaupt et al., “Reading performance depending on the type of cataract and its predictability on the visual outcome,” Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 1259–1267, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. M. S. A. Attia, G. U. Auffarth, R. Khoramnia, K. Linz, and F. T. A. Kretz, “Near and intermediate reading performance of a diffractive trifocal intraocular lens using a reading desk,” Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, vol. 41, no. 12, pp. 2707–2714, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus