Research Article

A Small Disc Area Is a Risk Factor for Visual Field Loss Progression in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma: The Glaucoma Stereo Analysis Study

Table 2

Comparison of ONH parameters between the progression and no-progression groups.

Optic nerve head parametersProgression ()No-progression () Value

Vertical disc width1.79 ± 0.181.89 ± 0.240.017
Horizontal disc width1.60 ± 0.241.69 ± 0.290.052
Vertical cup-disc ratio0.83 ± 0.080.82 ± 0.080.574
Horizontal cup-disc ratio0.73 ± 0.080.75 ± 0.090.227
Minimum rim-disc ratio0.018 ± 0.0240.018 ± 0.0250.979
Superior minimum rim-disc ratio0.077 ± 0.0550.086 ± 0.0600.363
Inferior minimum rim-disc ratio0.043 ± 0.0600.033 ± 0.0400.209
Superior rim width0.19 ± 0.090.21 ± 0.100.161
Inferior rim width0.12 ± 0.110.12 ± 0.090.922
Mean cup depth0.19 ± 0.070.21 ± 0.090.202
Maximum cup depth0.50 ± 0.150.53 ± 0.200.368
Height variation contour0.57 ± 0.220.58 ± 0.280.738
Disc area2.24 ± 0.462.49 ± 0.670.016
Cup area1.30 ± 0.471.50 ± 0.590.029
Cup-disc area ratio0.57 ± 0.120.59 ± 0.110.265
Rim area0.94 ± 0.260.99 ± 0.270.301
Rim-disc area ratio0.43 ± 0.120.41 ± 0.110.265
Rim-disc ratio of section 10.076 ± 0.0450.067 ± 0.0460.204
Rim-disc ratio of section 20.11 ± 0.050.11 ± 0.060.94
Rim-disc ratio of section 30.18 ± 0.060.17 ± 0.060.257
Rim-disc ratio of section 40.20 ± 0.080.19 ± 0.070.462
Rim-disc ratio of section 50.15 ± 0.090.14 ± 0.080.568
Rim-disc ratio of section 60.065 ± 0.0610.056 ± 0.0450.293
Disc volume0.87 ± 0.290.96 ± 0.470.217
Cup volume0.25 ± 0.140.33 ± 0.240.04
Rim volume0.17 ± 0.090.17 ± 0.100.995
Rim decentering0.28 ± 0.440.31 ± 0.420.668
Disc tilt angle11.51 ± 12.9710.07 ± 12.290.486