Research Article
Inverted ILM Flap for the Treatment of Myopic Macular Holes: Healing Processes and Morphological Changes in Comparison with Complete ILM Removal
Table 1
Baseline demographics factors for patients affected by myopic macular hole (MMH).
| | Inverted ILM flap () | ILM peeling () | value | Total () |
| Gender (M : F) | 7 : 20 | 3 : 10 | — | 10 : 30 | Age (years), mean (SD) | 57.8 (10.0) | 62.9 (13.3) | 0.1179 | 59.5 (11.3) | Eye (right-left) | 14 : 13 | 6 : 7 | — | 20 : 20 | BCVA baseline decimal, mean (SD) | 0.24 (0.11) | 0.28 (0.13) | 0.1644 | 0.25 (0.12) | Axial length (mm), mean (SD) | 29.3 (2.9) | 31.0 (3.0) | 0.1340 | 29.7 (3.0) | MMH minimum diameter in µm, mean (SD) | 440 (191) | 368 µm (179) | 0.1258 | 416 (188) | Lens | Aphakic | 1 (4%) | 0 (0%) | | 1 (2.5%) | Pseudophakic before Vx | 11 (41%) | 9 (69%) | | 20 (50%) | Phacoemulsification during Vx | 9 (33%) | 3 (23%) | | 12 (30%) | Phacoemulsification after Vx | 1 (4%) | 1 (8%) | | 2 (5%) | Cataract | 5 (18%) | 0 (0%) | | 5 (12.5%) |
|
|