Journal of Ophthalmology

Journal of Ophthalmology / 2019 / Article
Special Issue

Macular Hole: From Diagnosis to Therapy

View this Special Issue

Clinical Study | Open Access

Volume 2019 |Article ID 1345683 |

Mun Y. Faria, David C. Sousa, Bruna C. Almeida, Andreia L. Pinto, Nuno P. Ferreira, "Morphology of Peeled Internal Limiting Membrane in Macular Hole Surgery", Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 2019, Article ID 1345683, 6 pages, 2019.

Morphology of Peeled Internal Limiting Membrane in Macular Hole Surgery

Guest Editor: Akihiro Ohira
Received26 Dec 2018
Revised22 Feb 2019
Accepted28 Mar 2019
Published02 May 2019


Purpose. The aim of this work was to describe the ultrastructure and behavior of peeled internal limiting membrane (ILM) in macular hole (MH) surgery. Methods. Seven patients with MH were included, and vitrectomy with ILM peeling was performed in all patients. The ILM inverted flap technique was used. Two other flaps of ILM of the same patient were collected and studied using light and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). ILM cell type, distribution, and morphology were analyzed, and the proliferation or fusion potential of the ILM interface was evaluated. Results. ILM vitreous sides in apposition showed signs of proliferative fibrotic activity, producing a basal membrane that merges ILM sides. Conclusions. Epiretinal cells in ILM show proliferative capacity, with formation of microfibrils between adjacent sides of the ILM, which may explain adherence of ILM flaps to the hole border, contributing to closure of the hole in MH surgery. This trail is registered with NCT03799575.

1. Introduction

Full thickness macular hole (MH) is an anatomic opening in the fovea, the central area of the retina, and affects mostly women after the 5th decade. As the fovea is responsible for central vision, the loss of vision caused by a MH is very severe. MH was considered untreatable until Kelly and Wendel reported closing a macular hole after pars plana vitrectomy, which removed all anteroposterior (AP) traction [1].

Besides the importance of AP vitreoretinal traction in MH formation, tangential traction seems to have a significant role in progression and recurrence of MHs [2]. Activated glial cells, especially Muller cells and astrocytes, may proliferate and migrate from the retinal side to the vitreous side and form epiretinal cells causing tangential traction [3]. Also, hyalocytes from the vitreous cavity may induce cellular proliferation at the internal limiting membrane (ILM) [4]. These hyalocytes are found on the vitreous cortex, in close contact with the ILM at the posterior retina, and may have macrophagic-like activity [2].

ILM peeling is widely accepted as a safe surgical technique, showing a high success rate in MH closure [5]. The recent inverted flap technique introduced by Michalewska and Nawrocki for large macular holes allows for an even higher closure rate [6]. Instead of removing one piece of ILM, with this technique, the ILM is peeled until the hole border and one larger piece is left free and inverted over the hole and kept secure with intraocular gas, allowing for a large macular hole to close (Figure 1). The inverted flap to cover a large macular hole may be a temporal or superior flap of partially peeled ILM [7].

Herein, we describe novel findings concerning the morphological features of peeled ILM during IMH surgery that may help to explain the mechanisms of hole closure after MH surgery.

2. Patients and Methods

2.1. Surgical Procedure

Seven patients with MH larger than 400 μm, according to OCT-based classification [8] were submitted to a standard surgical procedure. The surgery was performed by the same surgeon (MF) and consisted of a 23-gauge, three-port pars plana vitrectomy and ILM peeling. Balanced salt solution (BSS; Alcon, Fort Worth, TX) was used as an irrigation solution. Posterior vitreous detachment was completed when needed and assisted with triamcinolone acetonide. A single-use macular contact lens (Grieshaber®, Alcon, TX) was used in ILM peeling. Brilliant Blue® Dual (Geuder, Germany) assisted ILM identification, which was then engaged with an end-grip intraocular forceps. ILM was peeled in a rosette way around the macula and trimmed until the border of the hole, but one large flap was left, large enough to invert over the macular hole. Two other samples of ILM, per patient, were also collected, elsewhere in the macular area, and harvested for laboratory analysis.

The tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki were followed. All patients provided written informed consent to the surgical and study procedures. Approval was obtained from the Ethics Committee of Hospital Santa Maria.

2.2. Laboratory Analysis

Of the two samples of ILM per patient that were harvested, one was immediately fixed and submitted to optic microscopy (OM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) analysis and the other sample was incubated in enriched medium 199 (Gibco) for 20 minutes at room temperature, after which it was also fixed and submitted to OM and TEM analysis. Analysis of all samples followed the protocol available at

2.3. Image Acquisition

Six electron micrographs were acquired for each fragment, using a Hitachi H-7000 electron microscope equipped with a megaview III digital camera. Fields of interest were randomly selected, and 15,000x magnification images were acquired.

2.4. Quantitative Analysis

Collagen areas were measured using the iTEM software (Olympus©) measurement tool. For each micrograph, collagen areas were manually assessed in relation to the total amount of sample present, and average values for each patient and fragment were calculated. A collagen fraction (%) for each fragment was also calculated (values in μm2).

3. Results

3.1. Macular Hole Closure

The macular hole was closed and vision improved in all seven patients. In postoperative OCT, each macular hole was covered with ILM and bridging of external limiting membrane (Figure 2).

3.2. Histology and Immunohistochemistry

ILM samples were stained with anti-GFAP antibody (antiglial fibrillary acidic protein), and the majority of cells found were positive for anti-GFAP. GFAP is the hallmark protein in astrocytes [9], a main type of glial cells in the central nervous system (Figure 3).

3.3. Light Microscopic Features

Microscopy analysis of semithin sections of both samples showed a continuous folded and wrinkled ILM strand. The vitreous side of the ILM was smooth and continuous while the retinal side was characterized by irregular undulations (Figure 4).

3.4. Transmission Electron Microscopy

The morphological features of both the vitreous and the retinal sides of the ILM were evaluated in terms of cell distribution. The retinal side had scarce cells, while the vitreous side had some epiretinal cells.

The same structures on both sides of the ILM were identified: the fragment that was immediately fixed was wrinkled with both the vitreous and retinal sides showing no evidence of merging activity nor fibrotic material between the two sides of the juxtaposed ILM (Figure 5).

On the contrary, in the ILM sample that was kept in enriched medium for 20 minutes, the two vitreous sides of the folded piece of ILM came in contact and proliferative fibrotic material was present in the areas where adhesion occurred. In terms of morphology and structure, these fibers resemble collagen microfibrils/fibers (Figures 6 and 7).

Table 1 describes the percentage area of collagen in each observed sample, fixed immediately upon collection and after 20 min incubation with enriched medium.

Collagen area fraction (%)
Fixed upon collectionFixed after medium enrichment

Patient A0.0019.50
Patient B0.006.68
Patient C0.0050.23
Patient D5.7717.78
Patient E0.0017.78
Patient F0.000.00
Patient G2.877.46

Values in %μm2.

4. Discussion

ILM peeling has been the standard procedure in MH surgery allowing closure rates of nearly 100% [10]. However, large macular holes, over 400 μm diameter, have an increased risk of failure, and 44% do not close at first surgery, with 19% having been reported to stay flat and open [6]. Macular hole surgery has improved the rate of closure after the introduction of the inverted flap technique, especially in long-standing and large macular holes and in holes seen in high myopia [11]. Also, in cases of refractory macular holes, the autologous transplantation of ILM allowed for an improved anatomical outcome of these macular holes [12].

In these difficult macular holes, after releasing all anteroposterior and tangential tractions, the surgical technique of sealing the macular hole with inverted ILM consists in closing the hole with ILM peeled to the hole border, inverted over, and then attached to the borders of the hole, instead of completely peeling all ILMs around the hole. In case of autologous transplant, there is no more ILM near the hole to peel. A piece of ILM is peeled elsewhere in the retina of the same eye and is carefully placed on top of the hole, with the help of perfluorocarbon liquid, secured with air and gas. The peeled ILM, transplanted or inverted, contains Muller cells fragments that can induce gliosis on the retina and on the surface of the ILM. The macular hole closes, eventually due to the merging of the ILM with structures at the hole borders, and we speculate that the creation of this closed space may activate growth factors that induce cell realignment. In an experimental animal model, Shiode et al. tried to identify the components of the ILM that were important for the proliferation of Muller cells and collagen and fibronectin were found to enhance their migration [13]. Yokota et al. described newly synthesized collagen fibers in an ultrastructure study of peeled ILM after vitrectomy for myopic traction maculopathy [14]. Schumann et al. reported newly formed collagen at the vitreous side of the ILM removed from failed macular hole surgery [15]. In our study, we found a merging tendency of ILM pieces when kept in enriched media, in six of seven patients, accompanied by collagen fibers and fibrosis, as observed by TEM analysis. Considering our results and the results reported by Schumann at al. associated with the novel inverted flap, we speculate that this fibrosis may actually happen in the ILM vitreous side of our patients’ eyes, allowing for hole closure, either because the vitreous side of the ILM has epiretinal cells or because of the presence of collagen fibers from the vitreous cavity.

In a clinical situation, surgery with vitrectomy and ILM peeling relieves anteroposterior and tangential mechanical forces. Gas tamponade creates prolonged contact of ILM tissue fragment with each other or with the underlying retinal tissue, which seems to be fundamental for hole closure. In our study, we found that when the two vitreous sides of ILM were in contact, epiretinal cells present in the ILM vitreous side form microfibrils that may contribute to the sealing process of MH surgery.

The limitations of this study include the small number of studied cases, with the possible consequence of randomness in the obtained findings. The identification of specific immunohistochemical markers for better cell characterization will also be a future added value. Also, the type of collagen, old and newly synthesized, has not been characterized.

Data Availability

All data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Authors’ Contributions

Mun Faria contributed to conceptualization and investigation. David Sousa was involved in methodology, review, and editing. Bruna Almeida contributed resources. Andreia Pinto was responsible for investigation. Nuno Ferreira was involved in validation, review, and editing.


  1. R. T. Wendel, A. C. Patel, N. E. Kelly, T. C. Salzano, J. W. Wells, and G. D. Novack, “Vitreous surgery for macular holes,” Ophthalmology, vol. 100, no. 11, pp. 1671–1676, 1993. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. J. Sebag, “Anomalous posterior vitreous detachment: a unifying concept in vitreo-retinal disease,” Graefe’s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, vol. 242, no. 8, pp. 690–698, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. R. G. Schumann, K. H. Eibl, F. Zhao et al., “Immunocytochemical and ultrastructural evidence of glial cells and hyalocytes in internal limiting membrane specimens of idiopathic macular holes,” Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 52, no. 11, pp. 7822–7834, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. E. A. Balazs, L. Z. J. Toth, E. A. Eckl, and A. P. Mitchell, “Studies on the structure of the vitreous body,” Experimental Eye Research, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 57–71, 1964. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. N. Lois, J. Burr, J. Norrie et al., “Internal limiting membrane peeling versus no peeling for idiopathic full-thickness macular hole: a pragmatic randomized controlled trial,” Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 1586–1592, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. Z. Michalewska, J. Michalewski, K. Dulczewska-Cichecka, R. A. Adelman, and J. Nawrocki, “Temporal inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique versus classic inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique,” Retina, vol. 35, no. 9, pp. 1844–1850, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. Y. Takai, M. Tanito, K. Sugihara, T. Kodama, and A. Ohira, “Temporal inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique for a macular hole patient unable to maintain postoperative prone positioning,” Retinal Cases & Brief Reports, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 323–326, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. J. S. Duker, P. K. Kaiser, S. Binder et al., “The International Vitreomacular Traction Study Group classification of vitreomacular adhesion, traction, and macular hole,” Ophthalmology, vol. 120, no. 12, pp. 2611–2619, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. E. M. Hol and M. Pekny, “Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and the astrocyte intermediate filament system in diseases of the central nervous system,” Current Opinion in Cell Biology, vol. 32, pp. 121–130, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. K. Spiteri Cornish, N. Lois, N. W. Scott et al., “Vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane peeling versus no peeling for idiopathic full-thickness macular hole,” Ophthalmology, vol. 121, no. 3, pp. 649–655, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. S. Kuriyama, H. Hayashi, Y. Jingami, N. Kuramoto, J. Akita, and M. Matsumoto, “Efficacy of inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique for the treatment of macular hole in high myopia,” American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 156, no. 1, pp. 125–131, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. Y. Morizane, F. Shiraga, S. Kimura et al., “Autologous transplantation of the internal limiting membrane for refractory macular holes,” American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 157, no. 4, pp. 861–869, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. Y. Shiode, Y. Morizane, R. Matoba et al., “The role of inverted internal limiting membrane flap in macular hole closure,” Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 58, no. 11, pp. 4847–4855, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. R. Yokota, A. Hirakata, N. Hayashi et al., “Ultrastructural analyses of internal limiting membrane excised from highly myopic eyes with myopic traction maculopathy,” Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 84–91, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. R. G. Schumann, M. Rohleder, M. M. Schaumberger, C. Haritoglou, A. Kampik, and A. Gandorfer, “Idiopathic macular holes,” Retina, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 340–349, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2019 Mun Y. Faria et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles