Intraocular Pressure Measurement Using Ocular Response Analyzer, Dynamic Contour Tonometer, and Scheimpflug Analyzer Corvis ST

<table class="table-group" id="tab1"><tr><td><table class="table"><tr><td class="thead-hr" colspan="2"><hr/></td></tr><tr class="thead"><td class="align_center" colspan="2">Descriptive data</td></tr><tr><td class="thead-hr" colspan="2"><hr/></td></tr><tr><td class="align_left">Number of subjects</td><td class="align_center">94</td></tr><tr><td class="align_left">Eye (right/left)</td><td class="align_center">47 (50%)/47 (50%)</td></tr><tr><td class="align_left">Gender (female/male)</td><td class="align_center">39 (41.5%)/55 (58.5%)</td></tr><tr><td class="align_left">Mean age (years)</td><td class="align_center">45.6 ± 17.2</td></tr><tr><td class="align_left">CCT (<i>μ</i>m)</td><td class="align_center">553 ± 33</td></tr><tr><td class="align_center" colspan="2">Intraocular pressure</td></tr><tr><td class="align_left">GAT-IOPc (mmHg)</td><td class="align_center">12.9 ± 2.4</td></tr><tr><td class="align_left">DCT-IOP (mmHg)</td><td class="align_center">16.1 ± 2.6</td></tr><tr><td class="align_left">IOPcc (mmHg)</td><td class="align_center">15.6 ± 3.3</td></tr><tr><td class="align_left">bIOP (mmHg)</td><td class="align_center">13.5 ± 2.4</td></tr><tr class="table-tr"><td colspan="2"><hr class="tbody-hr"/></td></tr></table></td></tr><tr class="table-fn"><td><div>GAT-IOPc: corrected Goldmann applanation tonometry-IOP; DCT-IOP: dynamic contour tonometry-IOP; IOPcc: corneal compensated IOP by using ocular response analyzer; bIOP: biomechanical corrected IOP by using Corvis ST; CCT: central corneal thickness.<br/></div></td></tr></table>

<div>Descriptive data of participants and results of intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements (mean value ± standard deviation).</div>

Journal of Ophthalmology

tab1

Table 1

Table 1: Intraocular Pressure Measurement Using Ocular Response Analyzer, Dynamic Contour Tonometer, and Scheimpflug Analyzer Corvis ST 