Clinical Study
Comparison of the Clinical Outcomes between Echelette Extended Range of Vision and Diffractive Bifocal Intraocular Lenses
Table 6
Subjective evaluation by questionnaire 3 months after IOL implantation.
| Questionnaire | ZXR00 (eyes = 54) | ZMB00 (eyes = 44) | value |
| VF-14 score, mean ± SD | 90.54 ± 12.63 | 85.54 ± 13.34 | 0.021 | QoV score, mean ± SD | 5.06 ± 6.15 | 8.54 ± 8.35 | 0.022 | Frequency score | 2.20 ± 2.43 | 3.39 ± 2.99 | 0.042 | Severity score | 1.65 ± 2.13 | 2.64 ± 2.69 | 0.023 | Bothersome score | 1.20 ± 1.74 | 2.52 ± 2.82 | 0.006 | Self-reported vision | | | | Day score, mean ± SD | 9.30 ± 1.24 | 8.39 ± 1.54 | 0.001 | Night score, mean ± SD | 8.74 ± 1.46 | 7.73 ± 1.88 | 0.004 | Spectacle dependence | | | 0.426 | Independent (n) | 32 (59.3%) | 21 (47.7%) | | Occasionally (n) | 18 (33.3%) | 17 (38.7%) | | Often (n) | 4 (7.4%) | 6 (13.6%) | | Most of time (n) | 0 | 0 | | Always (n) | 0 | 0 | | Satisfaction grade | | | 0.045 | Very satisfied (n) | 26 (48.1%) | 11 (25.0%) | | Good (n) | 19 (35.2%) | 17 (38.6%) | | Partial improvement (n) | 9 (16.7%) | 12 (27.3%) | | Little improvement (n) | 0 | 2 (4.5%) | | No improvement (n) | 0 | 1 (2.3%) | | Worse (n) | 0 | 1 (2.3%) | | Recommendation grade | | | 0.045 | Strong (n) | 24 (44.4%) | 11 (25.0%) | | Possible (n) | 17 (31.5%) | 13 (29.6%) | | Probable (n) | 13 (24.1%) | 18 (40.9%) | | Against (n) | 0 | 2 (4.5%) | | No opinion (n) | 0 | 0 | |
|
|
n number of eyes; VF-14 = Visual Function-14; QoV = Quality of Vision; SD = standard deviation.
|