Research Article

Comparison of Anatomical and Visual Outcomes between Idiopathic and Myopic Macular Holes Using the Internal Limiting Membrane or Inverted Internal Limiting Membrane Flap Technique

Table 1

Preoperative characteristics of patients with MMH without RD undergoing ILM peeling or inverted ILM flap technique.

VariablesILM peeling techniqueInverted ILM flap technique
AL < 26 mm (n = 25)AL ≥ 26 mm (n = 14)AL < 26 mm (n = 15)AL ≥ 26 mm (n = 12)

Sex
 Men (n (%))12 (48)6 (43)0.516 (40)6 (50)0.270
 Women (n (%))13 (52)8 (57)9 (60)6 (50)
Age (years, median (IQR))66 (60.7–74.5)63 (59.2–72.2)0.45865 (58.5–71.5)59.5 (56–67)0.428
Eye
 Right (n (%))9 (36)7 (50)0.503 (20)3 (25)1.00
 Left (n (%))16 (64)7 (50)12 (80)9 (75)
AL (mm, median (IQR))23.69 (23.40–23.83)30.09 (27.21–31.63)0.00123.29 (22.86–23.41)28.7 (25.8–30)0.001
AL >30 (%)7 (50)3 (25)
Refractive error (diopters, median (IQR))−1 (−2 to 0.25)−13.19 (−18 to −8.62)<0.001−1.25 (−2 to −0.12)−9.5 (−13.8 to −7.3)0.001
Posterior staphyloma (%)011 (79)05 (42)
Lens status
 Phakic3 (12)00.5401 (7)5 (42)0.060
 Phakic intraocular lens22 (88)14 (100)14 (93)7 (58)
BCVA (logMAR, median (IQR))0.4 (0.7–0.3)0.6 (1–0.4)0.1190.8 (1.3–0.6)0.45 (0.8–0.4)0.001
BCVA (Snellen chart, median (IQR))20/50 (20/100–20/40)20/80 (20/200–20/50)20/125 (20/400–20/80)20/56 (20/126–20/50)
Macular hole
 Minimum diameter (µm, median (IQR))267 (125–324)414 (294–559)0.218496 (362–633)307 (170–453)0.020
 Chronic MH (n (%))7 (28)1 (7)0.2184 (27)5 (45)0.448

AL, axial length; BCVA, best-corrected visual acuity; ILM, internal limiting membrane; MH, macular hole.