Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume 2019, Article ID 7813482, 7 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/7813482
Clinical Study

How to Avoid an Upside-Down Orientation of the Graft during Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty?

Department of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany

Correspondence should be addressed to Joanna Wasielica-Poslednik; ten.xmg@kindelsop

Received 9 February 2019; Revised 7 May 2019; Accepted 29 May 2019; Published 4 August 2019

Academic Editor: Mohit Parekh

Copyright © 2019 Joanna Wasielica-Poslednik et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. I. Dapena, L. Ham, and G. R. J. Melles, “Endothelial keratoplasty: DSEK/DSAEK or DMEK—the thinner the better?” Current Opinion in Ophthalmology, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 299–307, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. M. Parekh, D. Borroni, A. Ruzza et al., “A comparative study on different descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty graft preparation techniques,” Acta Ophthalmologica, vol. 96, no. 6, pp. e718–e726, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. R. S. Birbal, S. Sikder, J. T. Lie, E. A. Groeneveld-van Beek, S. Oellerich, and G. R. J. Melles, “Donor tissue preparation for descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty: an updated review,” Cornea, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 128–135, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. R. Quilendrino, M. Rodriguez-Calvo de Mora, L. Baydoun et al., “Prevention and management of descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty complications,” Cornea, vol. 36, no. 9, pp. 1089–1095, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. I. Dapena, K. Moutsouris, K. Droutsas et al., “Standardized “no-touch” technique for descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty,” Archives of Ophthalmology, vol. 129, no. 1, pp. 88–94, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. A. Matsuzawa, T. Hayashi, I. Oyakawa et al., “Use of four asymmetric marks to orient the donor graft during descemet’s membrane endothelial keratoplasty,” BMJ Open Ophthalmology, vol. 1, no. 1, Article ID e000080, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  7. B. O. Bachmann, K. Laaser, C. Cursiefen, and F. E. Kruse, “A method to confirm correct orientation of descemet membrane during descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty,” American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 149, no. 6, pp. 922.e2–925.e2, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. M. Bhogal, V. Maurino, and B. D. Allan, “Use of a single peripheral triangular mark to ensure correct graft orientation in descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty,” Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, vol. 41, no. 9, pp. 2022–2024, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. P. B. Veldman, P. K. Dye, J. D. Holiman et al., “Stamping an S on DMEK donor tissue to prevent upside-down grafts: laboratory validation and detailed preparation technique description,” Cornea, vol. 34, no. 9, pp. 1175–1178, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. P. Steven, C. Le Blanc, K. Velten et al., “Optimizing descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty using intraoperative optical coherence tomography,” JAMA Ophthalmology, vol. 131, no. 9, pp. 1135–1142, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. A. Saad, P. Sabatier, and D. Gatinel, “Graft orientation, optical coherence tomography, and endothelial keratoplasty,” Ophthalmology, vol. 120, no. 4, p. 871.e3, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. A. Saad, E. Guilbert, A. Grise-Dulac, P. Sabatier, and D. Gatinel, “Intraoperative OCT-assisted DMEK: 14 consecutive cases,” Cornea, vol. 34, no. 7, pp. 802–807, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. A. Musayeva, C. Manicam, A. Steege et al., “Role of α1-adrenoceptor subtypes on corneal epithelial thickness and cell proliferation in mice,” American Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology, vol. 315, no. 5, pp. C757–C765, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. L. S. Kwok, “Calculation and application of the anterior surface area of a model human cornea,” Journal of Theoretical Biology, vol. 108, no. 2, pp. 295–313, 1984. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. S. Heinzelmann, S. Hüther, D. Böhringer, P. Eberwein, T. Reinhard, and P. Maier, “Influence of donor characteristics on descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty,” Cornea, vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 644–648, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. N. Gerber-Hollbach, L. Baydoun, E. F. López et al., “Clinical outcome of rebubbling for graft detachment after descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty,” Cornea, vol. 36, no. 7, pp. 771–776, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. F. Schaub, P. Enders, K. Snijders et al., “One-year outcome after descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) comparing sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) 20% versus 100% air for anterior chamber tamponade,” British Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 101, no. 7, pp. 902–908, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. L. Ham, I. Dapena, V. S. Liarakos et al., “Midterm results of descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty: 4 to 7 years clinical outcome,” American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 171, pp. 113–121, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. M. Ang, J. S. Mehta, S. D. Newman, S. B. Han, J. Chai, and D. Tan, “Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty: preliminary results of a donor insertion pull-through technique using a donor mat device,” American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 171, pp. 27–34, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. M. A. P. Fajgenbaum, N. Kopsachilis, and E. J. Hollick, “Descemet’s membrane endothelial keratoplasty: surgical outcomes and endothelial cell count modelling from a UK centre,” Eye, vol. 32, no. 10, pp. 1629–1635, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. A. Miron, M. Bruinsma, L. Ham et al., “In vivo endothelial cell density decline in the early postoperative phase after descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty,” Cornea, vol. 37, no. 6, pp. 673–677, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. V. Romano, M. Parekh, A. Ruzza et al., “Comparison of preservation and transportation protocols for preloaded descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty,” British Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 102, no. 4, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. L. R. Newman, K. D. Tran, K. Odell et al., “Minimizing endothelial cell loss caused by orientation stamps on preloaded descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty grafts,” Cornea, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 233–237, 2019. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus