Research Article
Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling for Persistent Submacular Fluid after Successful Repair of Diabetic Tractional Retinal Detachment
Table 1
Clinical characteristics of 5 eyes with ILM peeling in diabetic tractional retinal detachment.
| Case no. | Sex/age | Eye | Tamponade in the first operation | Interval to ILM peeling (m) | Time to reattachment after ILM peeling (m) | LogMAR BCVA (Snellen equivalent) | Before the first operation | Last F/U before ILM peeling | Last F/U after ILM peeling |
| 1 | M/58 | L | C3F8 | 6 | <1 | 1.70 (20/1000) | 1.70 (20/1000) | 1.0 (20/200) | 2 | F/41 | L | C3F8 | 4 | <1 | 2.28 (HM) | 1.40 (20/500) | 0.70 (20/100) | 3 | M/59 | L | C3F8 | 4 | 2 | 1.00 (20/200) | 1.00 (20/200) | 0.80 (20/125) | 4 | F/48 | R | Air | 4 | 1 | 0.40 (20/50) | 0.40 (20/50) | 0.20 (20/32) | 5 | F/58 | R | Silicone oil | 6 | 2 | 0.80 (20/125) | 0.70 (20/100) | 0.50 (20/63) |
|
|
M, male; F, female; R, right; L, left; m, month; BCVA, best-corrected visual acuity; C3F8, octafluoropropane; F/U, follow-up; ILM, internal limiting membrane; HM, hand motion.
|