Research Article
Comparison of Ocular Biometry Profiles in Urban and Rural Cataract Candidates in Eastern China
Table 8
Patient ocular biometric data compared with other published studies.
| | Location | Eyes | Age (years) | Keratometry (D) | AL (mm) | ACD (mm) | Mean ± SD | Range | K1-mean ± SD | K2-mean ± SD | K-mean ± SD | Male | Female | Male | Female |
| Yu et al. [15] | Central China | 3209 | 70.51 ± 9.81 | 32.95 | 43.75 ± 1.59 | 44.84 ± 1.65 | 44.29 ± 1.58 | 24.38 ± 2.47 | 3.15 ± 0.48 | Lim et al. [6] | Southern China | 6750 | 70.40 ± 10.50 | 40.101 | 43.57 ± 1.69 | 44.69 ± 1.69 | 44.13 ± 1.63 | 24.28 ± 2.08 | 23.90 ± 2.18 | 3.08 ± 0.59 | 2.96 ± 0.55 | Guan et al. [25] | Eastern China | 1430 | 72.27 ± 11.59 | 16.98 | 43.57 ± 1.56 | 44.64 ± 1.65 | NR | NR | NR | Yuan et al. [26] | Northern China | 12449 | 69.80 ± 11.15 | 30.97 | 43.93 ± 1.67 | 45.08 ± 1.73 | NR | NR | NR | Huang et al. [16] | Western China | 6933 | NR | 50.98 | NR | NR | 44.23 ± 1.66 | 24.79 ± 2.48 | 23.88 ± 2.27 | 3.16 ± 0.47 | 3.01 ± 0.47 | Pan et al. [9] | Singapore | 3400 | NR | 40.83 | 43.95 | 44.7 | NR | 23.68 ± 1.06 | 23.23 ± 1.10 | 3.19 ± 0.36 | 3.10 ± 0.35 | Fotedar et al. [13] | Australian | 1321 | NR | ≥59 | 43.38 | NR | NR | 23.75 | 23.20 | 3.16 | 3.06 | Warrier et al. [3] | Myanmar | 1498 | NR | ≥40 | — | NR | — | 23.12 | 22.54 | 2.86 | 2.29 | Cui et al. [7] | Los Angeles | 5588 | NR | ≥40 | — | NR | — | 23.65 ± 0.94 | 23.18 ± 1.02 | 3.48 ± 0.34 | 3.36 ± 0.34 | Lee et al. [11] | Beaver Dam | 2375 | 71.90 ± 9.10 | 58.100 | — | NR | — | 23.92 ± 1.10 | 23.51 ± 1.17 | 3.14 ± 0.38 | 3.09 ± 0.36 |
|
|
D: diopter; K1: flat keratometry; K2: steep keratometry; K mean: keratometry; SD: standard deviation; AL: axial length; ACD: anterior chamber depth; NR: not reported.
|