|
| Author | No. of eyes | Mean follow-up in months (range) | Visual acuity evolution (logMAR) | Anatomical evolution | Comments |
|
| Theodossiadis et al. [23] | 41 | 37.1 (25–54) | 73% of eyes: stable VA
27% of eyes: VA loss
(19.5% eyes lost 5–15 letters) | Diameter increased by 13.7%
Foveal thickness decreased by 10.3% | Metamorphopsia
75.6% eyes: initial
95% eyes: final
No cataract progression |
|
| Bottoni et al. [24] | 34
10 eyes with “thicker ERM” | 18 (6–24) | Mean VA stable
VA slightly worse at baseline | Diameter stable in 79% eyes
Decrease of foveal thickness: 3% at 24 months
Thinner foveas at baseline
30% IS/OS defects (vs 12.5% in “typical ERM”) | 1/10 developed FTMH (compared with 1/24 in eyes with “typical ERM”) |
|
| Celik et al. [25] | 21 | 21.6 | Initial VA 0.51
Final VA 0.55 | 3 had IS/OS defects at baseline ⟶ 2 developed defects | |
|
| Pang et al. [15] | 145
42.7% with LHEP
57.3% ERM without LHEP | 26 | Initial VA 0.51
5% of eyes lost 0.3 lines
Initial VA 0.33
4% of eyes lost 0.3 lines | 18% anatomical progression
88% IS/OS disruption
13% anatomical progression
24% IS/OS disruption | No significant difference in the percentage of eyes that lost 0.3 logMAR lines |
|
| Zampedri et al. [26] | 189 eyes
Intact IS/OS line 66.1%
Intact ELM 78.3%
38% “atypical ERM” | 68 eyes—12 months
35 eyes—24 months | VA has not changed significantly
VA slightly worse in “atypical ERM” | Mean diameter increased significantly in both groups
Foveal thickness decreased significantly in the “atypical ERM” group | |
|
| Purtskhvanidze et al. [27] | 17 | 111 (75–155) | Initial VA 0.2
Final VA 0.3 | Decrease of foveal thickness
Increased diameter
Increased IS/OS defects | 2/3 of LMH and MPH remain stable after 8.3 years |
|
| Marques et al. [28] | 49
53% LHEP | 32 | | No differences in anatomical progression in patients with or without LHEP | |
|
| Compera et al. [29] | 34 (100% with LHEP) | 40.5 | | IS/OS defects:
65% at baseline
85% at final visit | Loss of VA correlates with maximal LMH diameter and IS/OS defects |
|
