Review Article
The Efficacy of Conbercept in Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy: A Systematic Review
Table 3
The comparison between groups.
| Outcome | Treatment comparison | value | A | B | 95% CI |
| Polyp regression rate | Conbercept | Aflibercept | 0.467 to 0.613 | 0.032 | Conbercept | Ranibizumab | 0.372 to 0.501 | <0.0001 | Aflibercept | Ranibizumab | 0.367 to 0.489 | 0.002 |
| BCVA | Conbercept | Aflibercept | 0.352 to 0.797 | 0.171 | Conbercept | Ranibizumab | 0.166 to 0.406 | 0.811 | Aflibercept | Ranibizumab | 0.327 to 0.693 | 0.056 |
| CRT | Conbercept | Aflibercept | 1.063 to 1.610 | 0.331 | Conbercept | Ranibizumab | 0.722 to 1.114 | 0.144 | Aflibercept | Ranibizumab | 0.976 to 1.473 | 0.032 |
| Injection frequency | Conbercept | Aflibercept | 5.790 to 6.752 | 0.01 | Conbercept | Ranibizumab | 4.263 to 6.772 | 0.501 | Aflibercept | Ranibizumab | 5.719 to 6.523 | <0.0001 |
| Adverse events | Conbercept | Aflibercept | 0.016 to 0.068 | 0.987 | Conbercept | Ranibizumab | 0.020 to 0.072 | 0.879 | Aflibercept | Ranibizumab | 0.027 to 0.061 | 0.912 |
|
|