Plication versus Resection in Horizontal Strabismus Surgery: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis

Table 4

Odds ratio for success.

Study	OR	95% CI	% weight
Kimura and Kimura [16]	1.19	0.52–2.76
Wang et al. [17]	1.10	0.37–3.27
Alkharashi and Hunter [11]	0.17	0.05–0.59
Huston and Hoover [19]	2.55	0.74–8.82
Huston and Hoover [19]	9.55	1.09–83.29
Lee and Kim [20]	0.49	0.26–0.94
Sukhija and Kaur [18]	(1)
Combined OR (Mantel-Haenszel)	0.97	0.43–2.22
Kimura and Kimura [16]	1.193	0.516–2.760	23.70
Wang et al. [17]	1.100	0.370–3.268	20.65
Alkharashi and Hunter [11]	0.171	0.050–0.586	18.96
Huston and Hoover [19]	9.545	1.094–83.294	10.67
Lee and Kim [20]	0.493	0.259–0.937	26.01
Sukhija and Kaur [18]	(Excluded)
D + L pooled OR	0.805	0.334–1.941	100.00

OR (95% CI)–Odds ratio (95% Confidence interval). (1) It was not possible to estimate OR-100.0% had success in both groups. Heterogeneity test-Chi (5) = 17.84 ). I² = 72%. Global test–t(5) = 0.07 (). Heterogeneity chi-squared = 14.06 (d.f. = 4) , I-squared (variation in OR attributable to heterogeneity) = 71.6%, Estimate of between-study variance Tau-squared = 0.6674, Test of OR = 1: t(4) = 0.48 Prob > |t| = 0.656.