Research Article
Efficient BFCN for Automatic Retinal Vessel Segmentation
Table 5
Comparison between the results of the BFCN and other methods on the STARE dataset.
| Method | Year | Sensitivity | Specificity | Accuracy | F-measure |
| Singh and Srivastava [8] | 2016 | 0.77939 | 0.9376 | 0.9270 | — | Lázár and Hajdu [38] | 2015 | 0.7248 | 0.9751 | 0.9492 | — | Zhao et al. [39] | 2017 | 0.789 | 0.978 | 0.956 | — | Zhang et al. [40] | 2017 | 0.7882 | 0.9729 | 0.9547 | 0.7815 | Yan et al. [41] | 2018 | 0.8979 | 0.9701 | 0.9646 | — | Lu [45] | 2018 | 0.8090 | 0.9770 | 0.9628 | — | Jin et al. [27] | 2019 | 0.7595 | 0.9878 | 0.9641 | 0.8143 | Li et al. [46] | 2019 | 0.8465 | - | 0.9673 | 0.8435 | Samuel and Veeramalai [21] | 2019 | 0.8282 | 0.9738 | 0.9609 | — | Ours | 2019 | 0.8287 | 0.9896 | 0.9735 | 0.8442 |
|
|