Research Article

Corneal and Epithelial Thickness Mapping: Comparison of Enhanced Spectral-Domain- and Spectral-Domain-Optical Coherence Tomography

Table 2

Interobserver reproducibility of corneal thickness assessment with Enhanced Spectral-Domain and Spectral-Domain-Optical Coherence Tomography in normal eyes.

Mean standard deviation (μm)Mean coefficient of variation (%)
ESD-OCTSD-OCTESD-OCTSD-OCT

Central1.211.990.030.20.40.03
Minimal1.771.960.770.30.40.73
2–5 mm superior6.244.940.631.10.80.66
2–5 mm supero-nasal2.244.580.0010.40.80.0005
2–5 mm nasal2.433.370.0360.40.60.01
2–5 mm infero-nasal2.112.660.190.40.50.11
2–5 mm inferior2.283.280.140.40.60.11
2–5 mm infero-temporal2.322.760.440.40.50.40
2–5 mm temporal2.133.540.0040.40.60.003
2–5 mm supero-temporal2.694.880.0040.50.90.002
5–6 mm superior7.507.030.881.11.10.88
5–6 mm supero-nasal5.117.970.220.81.30.11
5–6 mm nasal3.646.180.090.51.00.046
5–6 mm infero-nasal9.665.660.451.51.00.53
5–6 mm inferior2.527.440.0080.41.30.006
5–6 mm infero-temporal3.366.370.080.51.10.06
5–6 mm temporal3.714.670.320.60.80.19
5–6 mm supero-temporal7.276.720.781.11.10.93

Each measurement was performed by 3 trained operators in 30 eyes of 30 patients. Data in bold indicate significant differences between ESD-OCT and SD-OCT.