Journal of Ophthalmology

Journal of Ophthalmology / 2021 / Article
Special Issue

Advances and Clinical Applications of Anterior Segment Imaging Techniques 2020

View this Special Issue

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2021 |Article ID 5574194 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5574194

Dong Hyun Kim, Hee Kyung Yang, Sang Beom Han, Jeong-Min Hwang, "Effect of Topical Brimonidine 0.15% on Conjunctival Injection after Strabismus Surgery in Children", Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 2021, Article ID 5574194, 5 pages, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5574194

Effect of Topical Brimonidine 0.15% on Conjunctival Injection after Strabismus Surgery in Children

Academic Editor: Alessandro Meduri
Received08 Jan 2021
Revised07 Apr 2021
Accepted13 Apr 2021
Published04 May 2021

Abstract

Purpose. To investigate the effects of topical brimonidine 0.15% instillation on conjunctival injection after strabismus surgery in children. Methods. We retrospectively analyzed 63 Korean children who underwent strabismus surgery for intermittent exotropia. Patients received topical brimonidine 0.15% after surgery for up to 4 weeks. Conjunctival injection was objectively assessed using a software that automatically scored the region of interest from the image of the bulbar conjunctiva. Conjunctival injection scores were compared with those of the control group who were not prescribed topical brimonidine. Results. The mean scores of conjunctival injection after rectus muscle recession and resection were significantly lower in the brimonidine group than the controls at 4 weeks after surgery (, respectively). There was no significant difference in intraocular pressure between the two groups. No adverse effects, such as dry mouth, fatigue/drowsiness, headache, sedation, hypotension, or bradycardia, were reported. Conclusions. Administration of topical brimonidine 0.15% after strabismus surgery is efficacious and safe in reducing postoperative conjunctival injection.

1. Introduction

Various complications may occur after strabismus surgery, including local issues such as conjunctival injection, scar formation, and inclusion cysts; however, severe problems such as cellulitis and endophthalmitis are rarely seen [13]. Conjunctival injection is by far one of the most common complications after strabismus surgery [2]. Although patients do not expect conjunctival injection to persist for a long time after surgery, it may cause anxiety, cosmetic problems, and disappointment, despite successful ocular alignment [4].

Brimonidine tartrate is a selective α2-adrenergic receptor agonist that has been widely used to lower intraocular pressure (IOP) [5, 6]. Alpha-adrenergic agonists bind to α-receptors on vascular smooth muscles and induce smooth muscle contraction and vasoconstriction [7]. Alpha-adrenergic agonists have been widely used in the treatment of glaucoma because vasoconstriction limits blood flow to the ciliary muscle and reduces the production of aqueous humor [8]. As brimonidine affects vasoconstriction primarily via the α2-adrenergic receptor, it has been reported that the pre- and postoperative use of topical brimonidine can help reduce bleeding-related problems in ophthalmic surgery [911]. In addition, brimonidine has relatively lower systemic adverse effects than other vasoconstrictors such as phenylephrine, and the safety of brimonidine has been confirmed in children over 2 years of age [12].

A few studies have assessed the effect of prophylactic topical brimonidine in reducing intraoperative bleeding in strabismus surgery [1315]. However, to the best of our knowledge, no studies have reported the effect of postoperative use of topical brimonidine in reducing conjunctival injection after surgery. Therefore, we performed this study to evaluate the effect of brimonidine on conjunctival injection after strabismus surgery in children.

2. Methods

2.1. Patients

A retrospective study was performed on consecutive children between 7 and 12 years of age with exotropia who underwent unilateral lateral rectus recession with medial rectus resection (RR) by the same surgeon (J-M. H.). A limbal conjunctival incision was made in all operations, and all surgical incisions were repaired with a minimal number of sutures with absorbable 8-0 polyglactin sutures (8-0 Polysorb; Covidien, Mansfield, MA, USA). All patients underwent complete ophthalmological examination before surgery. Data were collected on demographics and clinical characteristics, including age, sex, preoperative angle of deviation, dosage of surgery, and cycloplegic refractive errors. Patients were excluded if they had other possible causes of inflammatory diseases of the anterior segment, including conjunctivitis, keratitis, and uveitis, a history of prior strabismus surgery, simultaneous oblique or vertical muscle surgery, simultaneous vertical transposition surgery, adjustable surgery, use of biodegradable collagen matrix implant, ocular disease other than strabismus, systemic disorders such as congenital anomalies, neurological disorders, and connective tissue disease, or if they did not comply with postoperative anterior segment photographs. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of the Seoul National University Bundang Hospital.

After surgery, all patients received gatifloxacin 0.3% (Gatiflo; Handok, Inc., Chungbuk, Korea), topical fluorometholone 0.1% (Fluvin; Taejoon Pharmaceutical, Seoul, Korea), and topical bromfenac 0.1% (Bronuck; Taejoon Pharmaceutical, Seoul, Korea) for 4 weeks. In addition, patients who were prescribed topical brimonidine tartrate 0.15% (Alphagan P; Allergan, Inc., Irvine, CA, USA) twice a day for 4 weeks were defined as the brimonidine group. The control group was defined as those who did not receive topical brimonidine.

2.2. IOP Measurement

IOP was measured using noncontact tonometry (ICT-900, KOWA, Japan) 4 weeks after surgery. IOP measurements were repeated until three measurements differed by ≤1 mm Hg, and the average of these three readings was recorded.

2.3. Conjunctival Injection

Conjunctival injection was measured by an objective method using software that automatically scores the region of interest from the image of the bulbar conjunctiva [1618]. A masked observer measured each anterior segment photograph of the conjunctiva using the contrast-limited adaptive histogram equalization algorithm, and the results were converted into numeric values ranging from 0 to 100 (Figure 1). The nasal and temporal quadrants of the conjunctiva were analyzed separately. Extensive subconjunctival hemorrhage was not included in the region of interest. Postoperative conjunctival injection scores were assessed at 4 weeks after surgery and were calibrated as the amount of increase in numeric values compared with preoperative values.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 22.0 for Windows (SPSS, Inc., Chicago). Independent t-test and chi-square test were used to compare the groups. Linear regression was used to analyze the relationship between conjunctival injection scores and age, cycloplegic refraction, angle of deviation, and surgical dosage. Statistical significance was set at . All continuous variables were reported as mean ± standard deviation (range, min, and max) values.

3. Results

A total of 63 consecutive patients (36 boys and 27 girls) who underwent RR surgery were included in the study. The mean age was 9.1 ± 1.0 years (range, 7.6–11.8 years). A comparison of clinical characteristics and surgical details between the two groups showed no statistically significant differences (Table 1). No cases of postoperative infection or abnormal bleeding occurred. No known adverse effects of brimonidine were reported, including dry mouth, fatigue/drowsiness, headache, sedation, hypotension, or bradycardia [19, 20].


CharacteristicsBrimonidine (n = 32)Control (n = 31)Total (n = 63)P value

Sex (M : F)18 : 1418 : 1336 : 270.884
Laterality (R : L)15 : 1717 : 1432 : 310.527
Mean age (years)9.2 ± 1.1 (7.7–11.8)9.0 ± 1.0 (7.6–11.6)9.1 ± 1.0 (7.6–11.8)0.549
Cycloplegic refraction (D)−1.30 ± 1.61 (−5.25–+2.25)−1.34 ± 1.82 (−6.50–+1.25)−1.32 ± 1.70 (−6.50–+2.25)0.916
Angle of deviation (PD)
Distance23.2 ± 7.4 (12−45)22.8 ± 7.2 (12–45)23.0 ± 7.2 (12–45)0.824
Near29.9 ± 8.3 (15−45)27.0 ± 8.6 (12–40)28.5 ± 8.5 (12–45)0.177
Surgical dosage (mm)
Medial rectus muscle6.1 ± 0.9 (4.0–7.0)5.7 ± 1.2 (3.5–7.0)5.9 ± 1.0 (3.5–7.0)0.168
Lateral rectus muscle5.6 ± 1.2 (4.0–8.5)5.4 ± 1.2 (3.5–8.5)5.5 ± 1.2 (3.5–8.5)0.605

M = male; F = female; R = right; L = left; D = diopters; PD = prism diopters. value by Pearson’s χ2 test. value by independent t-test.
3.1. Conjunctival Injection

Figure 2 compares the differences in conjunctival injection scores between the two groups. The mean scores of postoperative conjunctival injection after rectus muscle recession and resection were significantly lower in the brimonidine group than the control group at 4 weeks after surgery (, respectively). In linear regression analysis, no linear correlation was observed between the surgical dosage, age, axial length, or the degree of conjunctival injection.

3.2. Intraocular Pressure

The mean intraocular pressure at 4 weeks after surgery was 11.7 ± 3.3 (range, 7–20) mmHg in the brimonidine group and 12.4 ± 3.0 (range, 8–19) mmHg in the control group ().

4. Discussion

In this study, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of treatment with 0.15% brimonidine tartrate ophthalmic solution for reducing conjunctival injection after strabismus surgery in children. These data demonstrate that the postoperative administration of topical brimonidine 0.15% can significantly reduce conjunctival injection after strabismus surgery.

Conjunctival injection is an important cosmetic problem after strabismus surgery. Escardo-Paton and Harrad [4] reported that the median duration of conjunctival injection following surgery was approximately 10 weeks. In addition, a few patients had persistent postoperative conjunctival injection beyond 24 weeks. Although postoperative conjunctival injection does not cause severe ophthalmological problems, it may be a cosmetic concern and cause psychosocial stress that affects social activities over several weeks or months, as would be required for the injection to subside [21].

Currently, the most widely used ophthalmic vasoconstrictors, such as phenylephrine, are α1- or mixed α1/α2-adrenergic receptor agonists. However, α1-adrenergic agonists are associated with cardiovascular adverse effects, and rebound conjunctival injection may occur when discontinued, which restricts their long-term use. [2224] Conversely, since brimonidine affects vasoconstriction through the α2-adrenergic receptor, the possibility of cardiovascular events or rebound conjunctival injection is relatively low. Therefore, brimonidine can be safely used to reduce conjunctival injection after strabismus surgery. However, the overall safety profile of brimonidine in children under 2 years of age remains uncertain. [12] In our study, brimonidine was not prescribed for patients under 2 years of age.

Several studies have reported the efficacy of brimonidine in reducing bleeding-related problems in strabismus surgery [1315]. Two previous studies prophylactically administered topical brimonidine or phenylephrine in patients with strabismus before surgery [13, 15]. Those studies reported that both drugs can reduce intraoperative bleeding and postoperative subconjunctival hemorrhage compared with sodium hyaluronate when assessed by a subjective scoring system [13, 15]. Dahlmann-Noor et al. [14]. analyzed video images up to 20 minutes after instilling brimonidine or apraclonidine at the beginning of adjustable strabismus surgery in 10 adults. They quantified the surface area of the anterior ocular blood vessels on video images with ImageJ (open source, public domain software) and reported that brimonidine reduced the surface area of blood vessels by 69.2% and this persisted for 20 minutes. In our study, we evaluated the efficacy of postoperative topical brimonidine 0.15% instillation for a prolonged period of 4 weeks in children using the contrast-limited adaptive histogram equalization (CLAHE) algorithm that automatically extracts vasculature and scores the degree of vascularity in numeric values ranging from 0 to 100, as performed in the previous studies [1618]. We chose the CLAHE algorithm to determine postoperative conjunctival injection because it is theoretically most suitable for the quantification of vascularization, as shown in the previous studies [1618, 2527]. Our study is significant in that it has objectively proved the effect of brimonidine on conjunctival injection after strabismus surgery.

Topical brimonidine prescription has other benefits besides reducing conjunctival injection. Topical corticosteroids are generally used to control postoperative inflammation after strabismus surgery. However, there are concerns regarding IOP elevation associated with the use of steroids [17, 18, 2831]. In particular, there have been several reports of increases in IOP by up to 82% due to topical steroids after strabismus surgery in children [30, 31]. Even fluorometholone, which causes lesser IOP elevation than other steroids, significantly induced IOP elevation after strabismus surgery in children, and 23% of patients reported an increase of ≥10 mm Hg compared with the baseline IOP [17]. The next-generation corticosteroid, loteprednol, can also cause IOP elevation after strabismus surgery, especially in young children ≤8 years of age [18]. Therefore, postoperative brimonidine can be a prophylactic measure in patients with steroid-induced IOP elevation.

Our study objectively confirmed that topical brimonidine can be used to control conjunctival injection after strabismus surgery in children aged 7 years or older. Furthermore, we found that brimonidine did not cause serious systemic complications in children. Brimonidine can also alleviate IOP elevation that may occur with topical steroid application after strabismus surgery.

There are some limitations that must be considered. First, our study was a nonrandomized retrospective study; therefore, there may be a selection bias. However, to exclude this bias, we included all patients who underwent RR surgery between September 2019 and April 2020. Second, since conjunctival injection was assessed at 4 weeks after using brimonidine, the long-term effect after stopping the drug remains to be elucidated.

In conclusion, administration of topical brimonidine 0.15% after strabismus surgery is efficacious and safe in reducing postoperative conjunctival injection. However, further research will be needed to determine the long-term effect of topical brimonidine on postoperative conjunctival injection after discontinuation of the drug.

Data Availability

The Institutional Review Board of Seoul National University Bundang Hospital/Ethics Committee has placed ethical restrictions to protect patient identities. However, the data are available to anyone who is interested without restriction. The minimal dataset will be available upon request. For data requests, please contact the SNUBH IRB office at 82-31-787-8804, 98614@snubh.org.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Authors’ Contributions

Dong Hyun Kim and Hee Kyung Yang are co-first authors.

Acknowledgments

This study has been conducted with the support of the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (Grant no. NRF-2017R1D1A1B03029983) and the Korean government Ministry of Science and ICT(MSIT) (No. 2019R1F1A1061433).

References

  1. J. A. Bradbury and R. H. Taylor, “Severe complications of strabismus surgery,” Journal of American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 59–63, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. M. J. Wan and D. G. Hunter, “Complications of strabismus surgery: incidence and risk factors,” Semin Ophthalmol, vol. 29, no. 5-6, pp. 421–428, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. S. Olitsky and D. Coats, “Complications of strabismus surgery,” Middle East African Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 271–278, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. J. A. Escardó-Paton and R. A. Harrad, “Duration of conjunctival redness following adult strabismus surgery,” Journal of American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 583–586, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. J. C. Adkins and J. A. Balfour, “Brimonidine,” Drugs & Aging, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 225–241, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. S. Baiocchi, C. Mazzotta, A. Sgheri et al., “In vivo confocal microscopy: qualitative investigation of the conjunctival and corneal surface in open angle glaucomatous patients undergoing the XEN-Gel implant, trabeculectomy or medical therapy,” Eye and Vision (Lond)., vol. 7, p. 15, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. R. M. Graham, D. M. Perez, J. Hwa, and M. T. Piascik, “α1-Adrenergic receptor subtypes,” Circulation Research, vol. 78, no. 5, pp. 737–749, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. S. Arthur and L. B. Cantor, “Update on the role of alpha-agonists in glaucoma management,” Experimental Eye Research, vol. 93, no. 3, pp. 271–283, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. R. A. Norden, “Effect of prophylactic brimonidine on bleeding complications and flap adherence after laser in situ keratomileusis,” Journal of Refractive Surgery, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 468–471, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  10. M. C. Desco, A. Navea, E. Ferrer, and J. L. Menezo, “Effect of prophylactic brimonidine on bleeding complications after cataract surgery,” European Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 228–232, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. C. S. Kim, K. Y. Nam, and J. Y. Kim, “Effect of prophylactic topical brimonidine (0.15%) administration on the development of subconjunctival hemorrhage after intravitreal injection,” Retina, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 389–392, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. G. P. Daubert, “Is brimonidine ophthalmic a safe therapy for infants?” Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 289–292, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. S. Hong, C. Y. Kim, G. J. Seong, and S.-H. Han, “Effect of prophylactic brimonidine instillation on bleeding during strabismus surgery in adults,” American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 144, no. 3, pp. 469-470, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. A. H. Dahlmann-Noor, E. Cosgrave, S. Lowe, M. Bailly, and A. J. Vivian, “Brimonidine and apraclonidine as vasoconstrictors in adjustable strabismus surgery,” Journal of American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 123–126, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. A. Gupta, R. Kekunnaya, V. Sachdeva, and H. L. Rao, “Strabismus surgery hemostasis,” Ophthalmology, vol. 119, no. 3, pp. 649-650, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. I. K. Park, Y. S. Chun, K. G. Kim, H. K. Yang, and J.-M. Hwang, “New clinical grading scales and objective measurement for conjunctival injection,” Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 54, no. 8, pp. 5249–5257, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. H. K. Yang, S. B. Han, and J.-M. Hwang, “Diclofenac versus fluorometholone after strabismus surgery in children,” British Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 98, no. 6, pp. 734–738, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. Y. J. Yoo, H. K. Yang, and J. M. Hwang, “Efficacy and safety of loteprednol 0.5% and fluorometholone 0.1% after strabismus surgery in children,” Journal of Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 468–476, 2018. View at: Google Scholar
  19. R. J. Bowman, J. Cope, and K. K. Nischal, “Ocular and systemic side effects of brimonidine 0.2% eye drops (Alphagan) in children,” Eye (London, England), vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 24–26, 2004 Jan. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. Y. Levy and D. Zadok, “Systemic side effects of ophthalmic drops,” Clinical Pediatrics, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 99–101, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. J. Fishbaugh, “Subconjunctival hemorrhage—something more you should know,” Insight, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 20-21, 1995. View at: Google Scholar
  22. C. N. S. Soparkar, K. R. Wilhelmus, D. D. Koch, G. W. Wallace, and D. B. Jones, “Acute and chronic conjunctivitis due to over-the-counter ophthalmic decongestants,” Archives of Ophthalmology, vol. 115, no. 1, pp. 34–38, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. C. Tappeiner, G.-M. Sarra, and M. Abegg, “Abuse of vasoconstrictive eyedrops mimicking an ocular pemphigoid,” European Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 129–132, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. F. W. Fraunfelder, F. T. Fraunfelder, and B. Jensvold, “Adverse systemic effects from pledgets of topical ocular phenylephrine 10%,” American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 134, no. 4, pp. 624-625, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. S. B. Han, H. S. Jeon, M. Kim et al., “Risk factors for recurrence after pterygium surgery,” Cornea, vol. 35, no. 8, pp. 1097–1103, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. S. B. Han, H. S. Jeon, M. Kim et al., “Quantification of astigmatism induced by pterygium using automated image analysis,” Cornea, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 370–376, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. H. K. Yang, Y. J. Lee, J. Y. Hyon, K. G. Kim, and S. B. Han, “Efficacy of bevacizumab injection after pterygium excision and limbal conjunctival autograft with limbal fixation suture,” Graefe’s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, vol. 258, no. 7, pp. 1451–1457, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. M. F. Armaly, “Effect of corticosteroids on intraocular pressure and fluid dynamics,” Archives of Ophthalmology, vol. 70, no. 4, pp. 482–491, 1963. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. C. N. McGhee, “Pharmacokinetics of ophthalmic corticosteroids,” British Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 76, no. 11, pp. 681–684, 1992. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. M. Ohji, S. Kinoshita, E. Ohmi, and Y. Kuwayama, “Marked intraocular pressure response to instillation of corticosteroids in children,” American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 112, no. 4, pp. 450–454, 1991. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. A. K. Kwok, D. S. Lam, J. S. Ng, D. S. Fan, S. J. Chew, and M. O. Tso, “Ocular-hypertensive response to topical steroids in children,” Ophthalmology, vol. 104, no. 12, pp. 2112–2116, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2021 Dong Hyun Kim et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder
Views109
Downloads145
Citations

Related articles