Review Article
Analysis of the Responsiveness of Latanoprost, Travoprost, Bimatoprost, and Tafluprost in the Treatment of OAG/OHT Patients
Table 4
Reduction of IOP from baseline of PGAs in OAG/OHT.
| Author | Year | BIM (n) | TRA (n) | LAT (n) | TAF (n) |
| Konstas et al. [22] | 2007 | 9.3 ± 3.4 (124) | N. A | 8.3 ± 3.6 (125) | N. A | Mizoguch et al. [26] | 2012 | N. A | 2.2 ± 2.2 (90) | N. A | 2.3 ± 2.3 (90) | Kuwayama and Komemushi [24] | 2008 | N. A | N. A | 6.2 ± 2.5 (51) | 6.6 ± 2.5 (46) | Traverso et al. [25] | 2010 | N. A | N. A | 8.6 ± 3.0 (18) | 9.5 ± 3.1 (18) | Ge et al. [8] | 2015 | N. A | N. A | 9.2 ± 4.1 (105) | 9.8 ± 4.0 (91) |
|
|
BIM: bimatoprost, TRA: travoprost, LAT: latanoprost, TAF: tafluprost. |