Research Article
Changes in Intraocular Pressure after Transepithelial Photorefractive Keratectomy and Femtosecond Laser In Situ Keratomileusis
Table 3
Potential factors affecting the changes in IOP after FS-LASIK and TPRK were analyzed with marginal linear regression models using the GEE.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
∆IOP = −16.47 + 1.75 (PRK) − 5.57 (A1V) + 2.79 (peak distance) + 0.15 (CBI) + 0.09 (Integr. radius) − 0.02 (ablation depth). GEE, generalized estimating equation. and . FS-LASIK, femtosecond laser in situ keratomileusis; TPRK, transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy; SE, spherical equivalent; K, keratometric readings in diopter; IOP, intraocular pressure; bIOP, biomechanically corrected IOP; A1L, first applanation length; A1V, applanation-1 velocity; A2L, second applanation length; A2V, applanation-2 velocity; PD, peak distance; DA, deformation amplitude; CCT, central corneal thickness; A1T, applanation-1 time; A2T, applanation-2 time; CBI, Corvis Biomechanical Index; DA ratio, DA ratio at 2.0 mm; Integr. radius, the integrated area under the radius of the inversed curvature during the concave phase; ARTh, Ambrósio’s relational thickness in the horizontal profile; SP-A1, stiffness parameter at applanation 1. |