Comparative Efficacy of Phacotrabeculectomy versus Trabeculectomy with or without Later Phacoemulsification: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analyses

Ahmadzadeh, Afrouz; Kessel, Line; Subhi, Yousif; Bach-Holm, Daniella

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6682534

Journal of Ophthalmology

On this page

Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion Conclusions Data Availability Disclosure Conflicts of Interest Acknowledgments Supplementary Materials References Copyright Related Articles

Special Issue

Cataract Surgery in Complex Anterior Segment Pathology

View this Special Issue

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2021 | Article ID 6682534 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6682534

Comparative Efficacy of Phacotrabeculectomy versus Trabeculectomy with or without Later Phacoemulsification: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analyses

Afrouz Ahmadzadeh,¹Line Kessel,^1,2Yousif Subhi,¹and Daniella Bach-Holm^1,2

Academic Editor: Zisis Gatzioufas

Received14 Dec 2020

Accepted09 Jan 2021

Published13 Feb 2021

Abstract

There is no consensus on the surgical management of coexisting cataract in patients who undergo glaucoma surgery. In this study, we systematically reviewed the literature to compare the efficacy and safety of phacotrabeculectomy and trabeculectomy either alone or followed by later phacoemulsification. We systematically searched the literature databases PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central. Eligible studies were comparative trials of eyes with glaucoma that underwent either phacotrabeculectomy or trabeculectomy with or without later phacoemulsification. Our primary outcome measure was intraocular pressure (IOP) control closest to 12 months. Secondary outcome measures were efficacy closest to 12 months in terms of visual acuity, visual field, prevalence of complications, needling or revision, number of antiglaucomatous medications, and surgical success. We identified 25 studies with a total of 4,749 eyes. The IOP did not differ significantly between those who underwent phacotrabeculectomy versus trabeculectomy with (MD: 0.63, CI95%: −0.32, 1.59, ) or without later phacoemulsification (MD: −0.52, CI95%: −1.45, 0.40, ). However, phacotrabeculectomy was associated with lower risk of complications (RR: 0.80, CI95%: 0.67, 0.95, ) and better visual acuity corresponding to a 1.4-line difference (MD: −0.14, CI95%: −0.27, −0.95, ) compared to trabeculectomy. Other secondary outcome measures did not differ significantly (visual field, needling or revision, number of antiglaucomatous medications, and surgical success). In conclusion, postoperative IOP is comparable, and the number of complications is lower when phacotrabeculectomy is compared to trabeculectomy with or without later phacoemulsification in patients with coexisting glaucoma and cataract. However, our study also reveals that the level of evidence is low, and randomized clinical trials are warranted.

1. Introduction

Cataract and glaucoma are globally the most common causes of blindness and they frequently coexist [1–3]. It is believed that up to 10% of the elderly with cataracts have ocular hypertension (OHT) or glaucoma [4, 5], and in 2040, glaucoma is estimated to affect 111.8 million individuals worldwide [6]. Elevated intraocular pressure (IOP) is the only modifiable risk factor for the progression of visual field loss in patients with glaucoma. Among those who cannot achieve satisfactory target IOP and preservation of visual function, the current best practice is to consider filtration surgery. The most widely performed IOP-lowering procedure worldwide is trabeculectomy whereby a channel between the anterior chamber of the eye and the subconjunctival space is created [7].

An important number of patients requiring surgical intervention for glaucoma present with coexisting cataract, and it remains debated how best to manage these patients. Prior to trabeculectomy, it may be tempting to remove the lens and replace it with a thinner intraocular lens to increase anterior chamber depth in order to reduce the risk of the postoperative shallow anterior chamber [8]. However, trabeculectomy is often performed prior to cataract surgery since the optic nerve head in these patients is at high risk of damage from postoperative IOP spikes, which is a known phenomenon after cataract surgery [9], and also because postponing the trabeculectomy may increase the risk of visual field loss. On the other hand, performing a trabeculectomy in a phakic eye is challenging due to vitreous pressure that pushes the phakic lens forward during the operation. Further, trabeculectomy may advance cataract progression, and 6–58 % of the patients have been reported to convert from no cataract at the time of filtration surgery to cataract requiring surgery within the first year [10–12]. Trabeculectomy-induced cataract progression which necessitates cataract surgery may lead to a subsequent increase in IOP due to bleb failure [13, 14]. It is believed that bleb failure is related to postoperative inflammation and a change in the microenvironment, causing the closure of the filtration route of the aqueous humor, thereby making the filtering bleb dysfunctional [15, 16].

One solution to this problem is the combined procedure phacotrabeculectomy. Although in theory, it may possess many benefits, in reality, it obtained a poor reputation in its early years and is now a rarely used procedure in many glaucoma centers [17, 18]. However, the development of small incision phacoemulsification surgery has improved the success rates and reduced the complication rates after cataract surgery. This leads to the question—does modern cataract surgery allow a less hazardous profile of phacotrabeculectomy? The answer remains unclear and there is a lack of consensus on the best surgical management for these patients [19–22].

Here, we systematically reviewed the literature to compare the efficacy of phacotrabeculectomy with trabeculectomy (with or without later phacoemulsification surgery) on the management of glaucoma and coexisting cataract. We focused on small incision phacoemulsification surgery to present relevance to current clinical practice.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Design

This systematic review and meta-analysis was designed following the principles of the Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) working group [23]. The topic was defined using the PICO approach which in short stands for the patient (P), intervention (I), comparison (C), and outcome (O) [24]. According to Danish law, no ethical committee or institutional review board approval was required for this study. We followed the items of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) for all aspects of the reporting [25].

2.2. Eligibility Criteria and Outcome Measures

Eligible studies were defined as those who fulfilled the following criteria:(1)Population: patients with any type of glaucoma(2)Intervention: phacotrabeculectomy(3)Comparator: trabeculectomy with or without later phacoemulsification surgery(4)Outcomes: the primary outcome was the postoperative IOP closest to 12 months. Secondary outcomes were evaluated closest to 12 months and included visual acuity, visual field, the prevalence of complications with an exception for worsening of cataract, needling or revision, number of antiglaucomatous medications, surgical success, and failure(5)Study type: a comparative clinical study of humans. Studies were eligible regardless of study time (retrospective or prospective) or randomization

Intervention and/or comparator could be with or without the use of antimetabolites during surgery. We only considered studies disseminated in the English language. Unpublished registry trials were disregarded.

2.3. Information Sources, Search Strategy, and Study Selection

We searched the literature databases PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central. The search was performed on January 20, 2020. Considering the immense development in cataract surgery in the 20^th century and the differences between earlier practices and modern cataract surgery, we enforced a restriction on date of publication; i.e., we did not consider studies published prior to 1997 to ensure that only studies with modern surgical methods were included. Our search phrases and database searches were conducted with the assistance of a trained information specialist. We included a combination of keywords using the following search phrases:(1)(phaco-trabeculectomy OR phacotrabeculectomy) AND (“phacoemulsification”[Mesh] OR “Trabeculectomy”[Mesh] OR phacotrabeculectomy OR trabeculectomy OR phacoemulsification)(2)Trabeculectomy OR trabeculectomy failure OR trabeculectomy survival OR trabeculectomy success rate AND phacoemulsification AND (primary open-angle glaucoma OR POAG)

Two authors (A. A. and L. K.) screened titles and abstracts for eligibility and removed duplicates and obviously irrelevant reports. Remaining records were retrieved in full text to examine eligibility. All these records were read by two authors (A. A. and L. K.) who then discussed eligibility. In addition, reference lists of all articles read in the full text were crosschecked to identify other potentially relevant studies. Disagreements between the authors would lead to the involvement of a third author (D. B–H.) for further discussions and final decision making.

2.4. Data Collection and Risk of Bias Assessment

Two authors (A. A. and L. K.) extracted the following data from each eligible study: study design, study characteristics, glaucoma type, surgical methods, and outcomes of interest. The GRADEpro Guideline Development Tool was used to assess the quality of evidence for each outcome across studies [26]. The quality of evidence for each outcome started out as high level and could subsequently be downgraded because of limitations in study design (e.g., lack of randomization), risk of bias [27], inconsistency (heterogeneity) [28], indirectness [29], imprecision [30], and publication bias [31] to moderate, low, or even very low quality of evidence.

2.5. Data Synthesis and Analysis

All eligible studies were reviewed qualitatively in text and tables. The Review Manager 5.3 Software [32] was used to calculate estimates of overall treatment effects, and random-effect models were used to calculate pooled estimates of effects. Continuous outcome data were analyzed using the mean differences (MDs) approach with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and dichotomous outcomes data were analyzed using risk ratios (RRs) with 95% CI.

3. Results

3.1. Study Selection

Our search strategy yielded a total of 1,393 records. We included one other study, which we knew of a priori. After removing the duplicates (n = 406), 988 records were screened using title and abstract, and 48 records were deemed to be of potential interest and retrieved in full text. Of these, 20 records were not eligible for our review (Supplementary file 1). We concluded that 25 studies were eligible for our qualitative and quantitative review (Figure 1).

3.2. Study and Population Characteristics

We identified studies comparing (a) phacotrabeculectomy (n = 2,315 eyes) with trabeculectomy (n = 2,216 eyes) and (b) phacotrabeculectomy (n = 75 eyes) with trabeculectomy followed by phacoemulsification performed 3–6 months after trabeculectomy (n = 71 eyes). We did not identify studies with other combinations of phacotrabeculectomy, trabeculectomy, and phacoemulsification.

We did not identify any randomized studies. We included 19 retrospective and six prospective studies. The majority of the studies included a mixed group of glaucoma subtypes, and six studies consisted of patients with POAG only. Studies were based on populations in North and South America (USA, n = 3; Canada, n = 2; Chile, n = 1), Australia, n = 1, Europe (UK, n = 2; Italy, n = 2; Switzerland, n = 1; Belgium, n = 1; Turkey, n = 1), and Asia (China, n = 3; Singapore, n = 1; Japan, n = 1; Hong-Kong, n = 1; South Korea, n = 2; Iran, n = 1; Israel, n = 1; Saudi Arabia, n = 1). A detailed description of the included studies is available in Table 1.

3.3. Primary Outcome: Postoperative IOP in Phacotrabeculectomy versus Trabeculectomy Only

Twenty-one studies reported IOP control in patients undergoing phacotrabeculectomy versus trabeculectomy only. In total 1,682 eyes underwent phacotrabeculectomy versus 1,983 that received trabeculectomy. Evaluation of long-term IOP ranged from 1 month to 2 years in included studies [33–53] with 13 studies reporting IOP at 12 months after surgery [33, 36, 37, 39, 41, 43–45, 48, 49, 51–53]. Four studies included patients with POAG [33–36], and 17 studies included a mixed group of glaucoma patients [37–53]. The use of antimetabolites during the glaucoma procedures varied from the use of mitomycin C (MMC) or 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) or no use of antimetabolites to a combination of antimetabolites and no use of antimetabolites in the same study. Overall, we did not find any significant differences in long-term IOP control between the two groups, but the heterogeneity among studies was considerable (I² = 93%) (Figure 2).

3.4. Primary Outcome: Postoperative IOP in Phacotrabeculectomy versus Phacoemulsification 3–6 Months after Trabeculectomy

Two studies reported IOP in patients with POAG or mixed glaucoma undergoing phacotrabeculectomy (n = 75 eyes) or trabeculectomy followed by phacoemulsification (n = 71 eyes). All patients received perioperative antimetabolite (MMC or 5-FU). Postoperative IOP was measured at 12 months [57] or 2 years [56] after the last procedure. There was no difference in long-term IOP control between the two groups (Figure 3).

3.5. Secondary Outcome: Visual Acuity in Phacotrabeculectomy versus Trabeculectomy Only

Five studies reported logMAR visual acuity at any follow-up time in a manner that could be included in a meta-analysis. One study was based on patients with POAG [35], and the four other studies were based on a mixed glaucoma group [38, 40, 48, 55]. All studies used a combination of some patients receiving antimetabolites and others not receiving antimetabolites during glaucoma surgery. A total of 797 eyes had phacotrabeculectomy versus 1,183 who had trabeculectomy only. Long-term visual acuity was on average 0.14 logMAR better in the group receiving phacotrabeculectomy, corresponding to a 1.4-line difference on a visual acuity chart (Figure 4).

3.6. Secondary Outcome: Prevalence of Complications in Phacotrabeculectomy versus Trabeculectomy Only

Eighteen studies reported complications at the latest reported follow-up in eyes undergoing phacotrabeculectomy or eyes receiving trabeculectomy only. Four studies were based on patients with POAG [33, 35, 36, 54]; the remaining 14 studies were based on a mixed glaucoma group [37, 39–43, 46, 48–53, 55]. The use of antimetabolites during the glaucoma procedures varied from the use of mitomycin C (MMC) or 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) or no use of antimetabolites to a combination of antimetabolites and no use of antimetabolites in the same study. The studies reported a wide range of complications ranging from less severe to very severe: hyphema, conjunctival scars, corneal edema, keratitis, postoperative IOP spike, bleb leak, flat/shallow anterior chamber, hypotony, hypotonous maculopathy, severe postoperative inflammation, fibrin reaction, iris prolapsed, lens malposition, blebitis, endophthalmitis, bleeding problems, posterior vitreous detachment, epiretinal membrane, retinal detachment, serous choroidal detachment, neovascular glaucoma, hemispheric vein occlusion to aqueous misdirection syndrome. The included studies reported a total of 502 complications in the 2,203 eyes undergoing phacotrabeculectomy (22.8%) versus 540 complications in the 2,081 eyes (25.9%) undergoing trabeculectomy only. The difference was statistically significant (RR = 0.80, 95% confidence interval: 0.67 to 0.95, ) (Figure 5).

3.7. Secondary Outcome: Prevalence of Complications in Phacotrabeculectomy versus Phacoemulsification 3–6 Months after Trabeculectomy

Prevalence of complications was evaluated in eyes undergoing phacotrabeculectomy (n = 28/75) or the consecutive procedure of trabeculectomy and phacoemulsification (n = 37/71) in patients with POAG or mixed glaucoma [56, 57]. All patients received perioperative antimetabolite (MMC or 5-FU). There was no significant difference in the risk of complications in eyes that had phacotrabeculectomy performed compared to the total number of complications in eyes that had a trabeculectomy followed by phacoemulsification (Supplementary Figure S1).

3.8. Secondary Outcome: Visual Field in Phacotrabeculectomy versus Trabeculectomy Only

Two studies [41, 48] reported the effects on visual fields in patients undergoing phacotrabeculectomy versus trabeculectomy only. The studies were based on a mixed group of glaucoma patients, some patients received antimetabolites, and some did not. In total, 669 eyes underwent phacotrabeculectomy versus 1,150 that received trabeculectomy. No significant difference was found between the two groups (Supplementary Figure S2).

3.9. Secondary Outcome: Needling or Revision in Phacotrabeculectomy versus Trabeculectomy Only

Nine studies reported the need for needling or revision. One study was based on patients with POAG [54], and the other studies were based on a mixed glaucoma group with a combination of some patients receiving antimetabolites and others not [37, 40, 41, 45, 46, 48, 50, 52]. 1,652 eyes received the combined procedure whereas 1,662 underwent trabeculectomy. No significant difference was found between the two groups (Supplementary Figure S3).

3.10. Secondary Outcome: Surgical Success in Phacotrabeculectomy versus Trabeculectomy Only

3.10.1. Complete Success

Twelve studies reported complete success, which was obtained in a total of 951 out of 1,184 (80.3%) eyes undergoing phacotrabeculectomy and 1,375 out of 1,658 (82.9%) eyes undergoing trabeculectomy only. Two studies were based on patients with POAG [33, 35] and ten studies based on the mixed glaucoma group [37, 39–41, 44–46, 48, 50, 51]. The use of antimetabolites during surgery varied between the included studies. There was no significant difference between groups (Supplementary Figure S4). It should be noted that success criteria varied among included studies; a detailed description of success and failure criteria can be found in Table 1.

3.10.2. Qualified Success

Qualified success was reported in 12 studies, and its definition varied among the studies (Table 1). A total of 708 out of 1,041 (68.0%) eyes undergoing phacotrabeculectomy had qualified surgical success versus 1,191 out of 1,597 (74.6%) of patients undergoing trabeculectomy only. Two studies were based on patients with POAG [33, 35] and ten studies based on the mixed glaucoma group [37, 39, 41, 44–46, 48, 50, 51, 55]. The use of antimetabolites during surgery varied between the included studies. There was no difference in the likelihood of qualified success between groups (Supplementary Figure S5).

3.11. Secondary Outcome: Surgical Failure in Phacotrabeculectomy versus Trabeculectomy Only

Surgical failure was reported in 11 studies [33, 35, 40, 41, 44–46, 48, 50, 53, 55]. Two of these studies were based on patients with POAG [33, 35]. The use of antimetabolites during surgery varied between the included studies. Failure was reported in 117 out of 1,121 (10.4%) eyes undergoing phacotrabeculectomy versus 130 out of 1,596 (8.1%) eyes undergoing trabeculectomy only. There was no significant difference between groups (Supplementary Figure S6).

3.12. Secondary Outcome: Number of Antiglaucomatous Medications in Phacotrabeculectomy versus Trabeculectomy Only

Eleven studies reported the number of antiglaucomatous medications in 1,130 eyes receiving phacotrabeculectomy and 1,438 receiving trabeculectomy only. The latest available follow-up from where data were extracted ranged from 3 months [40] to 2 years [48]. However, the majority of studies reported the status at 12 months after surgery [37, 39, 42, 46, 51–53, 55]. One study was based on POAG patients [35], while the remaining 10 studies were based on a mixed group of glaucoma patients; some patients received antimetabolites and others not [37, 39, 40, 42, 46, 48, 51–53, 55]. There was no difference in the number of antiglaucomatous medications when comparing data from those undergoing phacotrabeculectomy versus trabeculectomy only (Supplementary Figure S7).

3.13. Risk of Bias within Studies

The quality of evidence was rated as very low for all outcomes (Supplementary File S2). The quality of evidence was downgraded due to the lack of randomized trials. In addition, the 25 included trials differed considerably in study design as well as included patients (e.g., glaucoma subtypes), details regarding the procedure (e.g., use of antimetabolites), and definition of outcomes (e.g., the definition of surgical success). The majority of the included studies except two reported the postoperative IOP [33–53, 56]. Postoperative complications were reported by 20 studies [33, 35–37, 39–43, 46, 48–57]. Use of antiglaucomatous medication after surgery was reported by 12 studies [33, 35, 37, 39, 40, 42, 46, 48, 51–53, 55]. Several studies reported success criteria subdivided as complete [33, 35,37, 39–41, 44–46, 48, 50, 51], qualified [33, 35, 37, 39, 41, 44–46, 48, 50, 51, 55], and failure [33, 35, 40, 41, 44–46, 48, 50, 53, 55], but the definition of complete and qualified success and failure varied among studies; see Table 1. The need for needling or revision in the intervention groups was reported by nine studies [37, 40, 41, 45, 46, 48, 50, 52, 54]. Visual acuity was reported by five studies [35, 38, 40, 48, 55]. Furthermore, the quality of evidence was downgraded because only half of the outcomes met the optimum information size, which is the number of participants needed for analysis to show a difference at a certain power [30] which means that for the other half of the outcomes, too few patients had been included collectively by the studies analyzed to reach any certainty as to which intervention provided a better or worse outcome.

4. Discussion

In this systematic review with meta-analyses, we found no difference in postoperative IOP control between phacotrabeculectomy and trabeculectomy with or without later phacoemulsification, whereas the complication rate was significantly lower with phacotrabeculectomy. The IOP-lowering effect is important, as low IOP is the primary goal of glaucoma surgery. The surgical complication rate is obviously another crucial factor to consider when choosing which surgical method to use. Additionally, we found a positive effect on visual acuity after phacotrabeculectomy compared to trabeculectomy. This difference is not surprising, and a comparison of the change in visual acuity after a phacotrabeculectomy compared to trabeculectomy followed by phacoemulsification would be ideal, but unfortunately, these results were not available in the included studies. Other outcome measures (needling or revision, number of antiglaucomatous medications, and surgical success) 12 months postoperatively did not differ significantly between the groups. When interpreting these results, it is important to remember that this evidence is based on nonrandomized comparative studies with a marked risk of biases. However, we summarize the best evidence available, which suggests that phacotrabeculectomy for glaucoma in eyes with coexisting cataract should be considered a reasonable option. Well-designed randomized clinical trials are warranted for more conclusive evidence.

There were significantly fewer postoperative complications among those undergoing phacotrabeculectomy when compared to trabeculectomy with or without later phacoemulsification (22.8% versus 25.9%). Postoperative endophthalmitis was reported in seven studies [37, 41–43, 48, 53, 54] at a rate of 0.4% versus 0.3% in phacotrabeculectomy and trabeculectomy, respectively. One of the most frequently reported complications was hypotony. Twelve studies [35, 37, 39–41, 43, 46, 48, 50, 51, 54, 55] reported hypotony in a total of 123 out of 2,203 (5.6%) eyes undergoing phacotrabeculectomy and 184 out of 2,081 (8.8%) eyes undergoing trabeculectomy only. One could hypothesize that the greater inflammation after phacotrabeculectomy decreased the risk of hypotony.

Remarkably, only two studies reported the effect of surgery on visual field preservation, which makes it difficult to draw any credible conclusion on this important topic. This problem—a plethora of IOP data and absence of visual field data—is a well-known issue in many glaucoma studies and limits the generalizability of the conclusions of this study in terms of what to expect regarding postoperative preservation of visual field.

The likelihood of surgical success was only reported by studies comparing phacotrabeculectomy with trabeculectomy. There was no overall significant difference in the likelihood of surgical success between the two procedures. The criteria used to define complete and qualified success and failure varied considerably among the included studies making a comparison between studies challenging. However, the criteria for surgical success were the same for all participants in the individual studies, making the study-specific comparison usable. Differences in the definition of surgical success in glaucoma literature have been addressed previously. A systematic review with a search limit of 5 years found 92 IOP-related success definitions. When these criteria were applied to the same subset of eyes undergoing trabeculectomy, the success rate varied between 36 and 98% [58, 59].

Limitations of the present study should be taken into account when interpreting its results. First, our data is based on nonrandomized studies, which leads to a low evidence level for our conclusions. When patients are not randomized and data are obtained retrospectively, it should be remembered that the patient has been assigned to a certain intervention often based on what was considered to be the best option for the patient. This bias can only be addressed appropriately through prospectively designed randomized clinical trials. Second, the differences across studies in their design and definitions introduce a level of uncertainty when pooling data. This is unfortunately an issue in any systematic review, but within the field of glaucoma, there is an ambition of achieving stronger uniformity with the World Glaucoma Association Guidelines [60]. Hopefully, this limitation will be less of an issue in the future. Third, although we present analyses of different subtypes of glaucoma and use of metabolites separately, one limitation is that we look at different glaucoma subtypes collectively and not only on a specific subtype of glaucoma. This may introduce some uncertainty in the interpretation of the results. Fourth, although meta-analyses provide summary estimates of reported data and are high in the evidence pyramid, it should be remembered that the summary estimates in this study are a sum of nonrandomized comparative studies with important limitations. Therefore, our results should be interpreted with caution. Finally, to some extent, it is our perception that phacotrabeculectomy is a topic with different opinions. It can be speculated that such opinions influence publication decisions and therefore publication bias may be present.

5. Conclusions

We find similar postoperative IOP control, fewer complications, and better visual acuity with phacotrabeculectomy compared to trabeculectomy only. Phacotrabeculectomy addresses the patients´ two eye diseases simultaneously, possibly shortening the patients’ contact to the health care system, and is a surgical option to consider when choosing the best surgical option for a patient with coexisting glaucoma and cataract and a need for an IOP-lowering procedure. Although this is the best evidence available, it should be noted that the level of evidence is low, based primarily on nonrandomized or retrospective studies, and better-designed studies are needed.

Data Availability

The original report data were obtained from the literature databases PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central.

Disclosure

The funding bodies had no influence on conception, design, data analysis, or the decision to publish the study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the information specialist Karine Korsgaard for assistance in the literature search. This research was funded by Fight for Sight Denmark, Fabrikant Einar Willumsens Foundation, and the Synoptik Foundation.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary File 1: list of excluded studies. Supplementary File 2: a review of evidence quality. Supplementary Figure S1: forest plot of the risk of complications after phacotrabeculectomy versus phacoemulsification 3–6 months after trabeculectomy. Supplementary Figure S2: forest plot of the visual field after phacotrabeculectomy versus trabeculectomy only. Supplementary Figure S3: forest plot of the risk of needling or revision after phacotrabeculectomy versus trabeculectomy only. Supplementary Figure S4: forest plot of the complete success after phacotrabeculectomy versus trabeculectomy only. Supplementary Figure S5: forest plot of the qualified success after phacotrabeculectomy versus trabeculectomy only. Supplementary Figure S6: forest plot of the surgical failure after phacotrabeculectomy versus trabeculectomy only. Supplementary Figure S7: forest plot of the difference in a number of antiglaucomatous medications after phacotrabeculectomy versus trabeculectomy only. (Supplementary Materials)

References

S. Kingman, “Glaucoma is second leading cause of blindness globally,” Bulletin of the World Health Organization, vol. 82, pp. 887-888, 2004.
View at: Google Scholar
S. Foran, J. J. Wang, and P. Mitchell, “Causes of visual impairment in two older population cross-sections: the blue mountains eye study,” Ophthalmic Epidemiology, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 215–225, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S.-Y. Wu, A. Hennis, B. Nemesure, and M. C. Leske, “Impact of glaucoma, lens opacities, and cataract surgery on visual functioning and related quality of life: the barbados eye studies,” Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 1333–1338, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. S. Friedman, R. C. Wolfs, B. J. O’Colmain et al., “Prevalence of open-angle glaucoma among adults in the United States,” Archives of Ophthalmology (Chicago, Ill.: 1960), vol. 122, no. 4, p. 532, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N Congdon, “Prevalence of cataract and pseudophakia/aphakia among adults in the United States,” Archives of Ophthalmology (Chicago, Ill.: 1960), vol. 122, no. 4, p. 487, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y-C Tham, X Li, TY Wong, HA Quigley, T Aung, and C-Y Cheng, “Global prevalence of glaucoma and projections of glaucoma burden through 2040,” Ophthalmology, vol. 121, no. 11, pp. 2081–2090, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. F. Cordeiro, D. Siriwardena, L. Chang, and P. T. Khaw, “Wound healing modulation after glaucoma surgery,” Current Opinion in Ophthalmology, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 121–126, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. S. Kung, D. Y. Choi, A. S. Cheema, and K. Singh, “Cataract surgery in the glaucoma patient,” Middle East African Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 22, pp. 10–17, 2015.
View at: Google Scholar
T. Pohjalainen, E. Vesti, R. J. Uusitalo, and L. Laatikainen, “Phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation in eyes with open-angle glaucoma,” Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica, vol. 79, no. 3, pp. 313–316, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. Rajavi, H. Moezzi-Ghadim, and K. Kamrava, “The effect of trabeculectomy on cataract formation or progression,” Journal of Ophthalmic & Vision Research, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 84–89, 2009.
View at: Google Scholar
L. Daugeliene, T. Yamamoto, A. Sawada, and Y. Kitazawa, “An image analysis study of cataract development after trabeculectomy with mitomycin C,” Ophthalmologica, vol. 212, no. 4, pp. 244–249, 1998.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C Hylton, N Congdon, D Friedman et al., “Cataract after glaucoma filtration surgery,” American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 135, no. 2, pp. 231-232, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
The AGIS Investigators, “The advanced glaucoma intervention study: 8. risk of cataract formation after trabeculectomy,” Archives of Ophthalmologyl, vol. 119, pp. 1771–1779, 2001.
View at: Google Scholar
P. Lichter, D. C. Musch, B. W. Gillespie et al., “Interim clinical outcomes in the collaborative initial glaucoma treatment study comparing initial treatment randomized to medications or surgery,” Ophthalmology, vol. 108, no. 11, pp. 1943–1953, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Nishizawa, T. Inoue, S. Ohira et al., “The influence of phacoemulsification on surgical outcomes of trabeculectomy with mitomycin-C for uveitic glaucoma,” PLoS One, vol. 11, no. 3, Article ID e0151947, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Inoue, T. Kawaji, M. Inatani, T. Kameda, N. Yoshimura, and H. Tanihara, “Simultaneous increases in multiple proinflammatory cytokines in the aqueous humor in pseudophakic glaucomatous eyes,” Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, vol. 38, no. 8, pp. 1389–1397, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. J. Augustinus and T. Zeyen, “The effect of phacoemulsification and combined phaco/glaucoma procedures on the intraocular pressure in open-angle glaucoma. a review of the literature,” Bulletin de la Societe Belge d’ophtalmologie, vol. 320, pp. 51–66, 2012.
View at: Google Scholar
C. C. Tham, Y. Y. Kwong, D. Y. Leung et al., “Phacoemulsification vs phacotrabeculectomy in chronic angle-closure glaucoma with cataract: complications,” Archives of Ophthalmology, vol. 128, pp. 303–311, 2010.
View at: Google Scholar
J. Parihar, R. Gupta, P. Sahoo et al., “Phacotrabeculectomy versus conventional combined technique in coexisting glaucoma and cataract,” Medical Journal Armed Forces India, vol. 61, no. 2, pp. 139–142, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. H. Hsu and S. A. Obstbaum, “Technique and outcome of combined phacoemulsification and trabeculectomy,” Current Opinion in Ophthalmology, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 9–14, 1998.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. S. Friedman, H. D. Jampel, L. H. Lubomski et al., “Surgical strategies for coexisting glaucoma and cataract,” Ophthalmology, vol. 109, no. 10, pp. 1902–1913, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. S. Schuman, “Surgical management of coexisting cataract and glaucoma,” Ophthalmic Surgery and Lasers, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 45–59, 1996.
View at: Google Scholar
G. Guyatt, A. D. Oxman, E. A. Akl et al., “GRADE guidelines: 1. introduction-GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables,” Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, vol. 64, no. 4, pp. 383–394, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. H. Guyatt, A. D. Oxman, R. Kunz et al., “GRADE guidelines: 2. framing the question and deciding on important outcomes,” Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, vol. 64, no. 4, pp. 395–400, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Alderson, A. Liberati, J. Tetzlaff, D. G. Altman, and T. P. PRISMA Group, “Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement,” PLoS Medicine, vol. 6, Article ID e1000097, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Balshem, M. Helfand, H. J. Schünemann et al., “GRADE guidelines: 3. rating the quality of evidence,” Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, vol. 64, no. 4, pp. 401–406, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. H. Guyatt, A. D. Oxman, G. Vist et al., “GRADE guidelines: 4. rating the quality of evidence-study limitations (risk of bias),” Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, vol. 64, no. 4, pp. 407–415, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. H. Guyatt, A. D. Oxman, R. Kunz et al., “GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidence-inconsistency,” Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, vol. 64, no. 12, pp. 1294–1302, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. H. Guyatt, A. D. Oxman, R. Kunz et al., “GRADE guidelines: 8. Rating the quality of evidence-indirectness,” Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, vol. 64, no. 12, pp. 1303–1310, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. H. Guyatt, A. D. Oxman, R. Kunz et al., “GRADE guidelines 6. Rating the quality of evidence-imprecision,” Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, vol. 64, no. 12, pp. 1283–1293, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. H. Guyatt, A. D. Oxman, V. Montori et al., “GRADE guidelines: 5. Rating the quality of evidence-publication bias,” Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, vol. 64, no. 12, pp. 1277–1282, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
ReviewManager (RevMan). The Nordic Cochrane Centre Copenhagen, Denmark, 2014 TCC.
X. Li, Y. Liu, Y. Li, and M. Wang, “Effects of modified trabeculectomy combined with phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation on intraocular pressure and complications in patients with primary open angle glaucoma,” International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, vol. 12, pp. 1778–1784, 2019.
View at: Google Scholar
M. Pakravan, M. Afroozifar, and S. Yazdani, “Corneal biomechanical changes following trabeculectomy, phaco-trabeculectomy, ahmed glaucoma valve implantation and phacoemulsification,” Journal of Ophthalmic & Vision Research, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 7–13, 2014.
View at: Google Scholar
J. L. Jung, C. G. Isida-Llerandi, G. Lazcano-Gomez, J. R. SooHoo, and M. Y. Kahook, “Intraocular pressure control after trabeculectomy, phacotrabeculectomy and phacoemulsification in a hispanic population,” Journal of Current Glaucoma Practice, vol. 8, pp. 67–74, 2014.
View at: Google Scholar
J. Lochhead, R. J. Casson, and J. F. Salmon, “Long term effect on intraocular pressure of phacotrabeculectomy compared to trabeculectomy,” British Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 87, no. 7, pp. 850–852, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Chang, M. Thiagarajan, M. Moseley et al., “Intraocular pressure outcome in primary 5FU phacotrabeculectomies compared with 5FU trabeculectomies,” Journal of Glaucoma, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 475–481, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. G. Demir, A. Olgun, D. Guven et al., “The effect of combined phacotrabeculectomy, trabeculectomy and phacoemulsification on the corneal endothelium in the early stage: a preliminary study,” International Ophthalmology, vol. 39, no. 9, pp. 1–8, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. J. Derick, J. Evans, and N. D. Baker, “Combined phacoemulsification and trabeculectomy versus trabeculectomy alone: a comparison study using mitomycin-C,” Ophthalmic Surgery and Lasers, vol. 29, no. 9, pp. 707–713, 1998.
View at: Google Scholar
E. Graf N, M. Müller, F. Gerlach et al., “Comparison of 2-year-results of mitomycin C-augmented trabeculectomy with or without cataract extraction in glaucoma patients,” Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 54, pp. 347–354, 2019.
View at: Google Scholar
L. Jiang, S. Eaves, N. Dhillon, and P. Ranjit, “Postoperative outcomes following trabeculectomy and nonpenetrating surgical procedures: a 5-year longitudinal study,” Clinical Ophthalmology, vol. 12, pp. 995–1002, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Kleinmann, H. Katz, A. Pollack, E. Schechtman, R. Rachmiel, and M. Zalish, “Comparison of trabeculectomy with mitomycin C with or without phacoemulsification and lens implantation,” Ophthalmic Surgery Lasers, vol. 33, pp. 102–108, 2002.
View at: Google Scholar
S. K. Murthy, K. F. Damji, Y. Pan, and W. G. Hodge, “Trabeculectomy and phacotrabeculectomy, with mitomycin-C, show similar two-year target IOP outcomes,” Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 51–59, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. A. Polikoff, A. Taglienti, R. A. Chanis et al., “Is intraocular pressure in the early postoperative period predictive of antimetabolite-augmented filtration surgery success?” Journal of Glaucoma, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 497–503, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. H. Seo, Y. Lee, J. H. Shin, Y. A. Kim, and K. H. Park, “Comparison of conjunctival vascularity changes using optical coherence tomography angiography after trabeculectomy and phacotrabeculectomy,” Graefe’s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, vol. 257, no. 10, pp. 2239–2255, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. P. Singh, I. Goldberg, and M. Mohsin, “The efficacy and safety of intraoperative and/or postoperative 5-fluorouracil in trabeculectomy and phacotrabeculectomy,” Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 296–302, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Zhong, H. Zhou, X. Chen, W. Zhang, and L. Yi, “Influence of glaucoma surgery on the ocular surface using oculus keratograph,” International Ophthalmology, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 745–752, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Hong, K. Park, S. J. Ha, H. Y. Yeom, G. J. Seong, and Y. J. Hong, “Long-term intraocular pressure control of trabeculectomy and triple procedure in primary open angle glaucoma and chronic primary angle closure glaucoma,” Ophthalmologica, vol. 221, no. 6, pp. 395–401, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Bellucci, S. Perfetti, S. Babighian, S. Morselli, and L. Bonomi, “Filtration and complications after trabeculectomy and after phaco-trabeculectomy,” Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica. Supplement, vol. 224, pp. 44-45, 1997.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. N. K. Choy, “Comparison of surgical outcome of trabeculectomy and phacotrabeculectomy in Chinese glaucoma patients,” International Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 10, no. 12, pp. 1928–1930, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Cillino, F. D. Pace, A. Casuccio et al., “Deep sclerectomy versus punch trabeculectomy with or without phacoemulsification,” Journal of Glaucoma, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 500–506, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M Guggenbach, DS Mojon, and M Bohnke, “Evaluation of phacotrabeculectomy versus trabeculectomy alone,” Ophthalmologica, vol. 213, no. 6, pp. 367–370, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. J. Noben, M. C. Linsen, and T. G. Zeyen, “Is combined phacoemulsification and trabeculectomy as effective as trabeculectomy alone?” Bulletin de la Societe Belge d’ophtalmologie., vol. 270, pp. 85–90, 1998.
View at: Google Scholar
Y.-L. Tan, P. F. Tsou, G. S. Tan et al., “Postoperative complications after glaucoma surgery for primary angle-closure glaucoma vs primary open-angle glaucoma,” Archives of Ophthalmology, vol. 129, no. 8, pp. 987–992, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Ogata-Iwao, M. Inatani, Y. Takihara, T. Inoue, K. Iwao, and H. Tanihara, “A prospective comparison between trabeculectomy with mitomycin C and phacotrabeculectomy with mitomycin C,” Acta Ophthalmologica, vol. 91, no. 6, pp. e500–e501, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Donoso and A. Rodríguez, “Combined versus sequential phacotrabeculectomy with intraoperative 5-fluorouracil,” Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 71–74, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. F. El-Sayyad, M. H. Helal, M. M. Khalil, and M. A. El-Maghraby, “Phacotrabeculectomy versus two-stage operation: a matched study,” Ophthalmic Surgery Lasers, vol. 30, pp. 260–265, 1999.
View at: Google Scholar
W. H. Morgan and D.-Y. Yu, “Surgical management of glaucoma: a review,” Clinical & Experimental Ophthalmology, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 388–399, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. P. Rotchford and A. J. King, “Moving the goal posts,” Ophthalmology, vol. 117, no. 1, pp. 18–23, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. K. Heuer and K. B. Grehn, Consensus on Definitions of Success Guidelines on Design and Reporting of Glaucoma Surgical Trials, World Glaucoma Association, Boston, MA, USA, 2009.

Copyright

Copyright © 2021 Afrouz Ahmadzadeh et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

1470

Downloads

1014

Citations