Research Article
Effectiveness of Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty Applied to 360° vs. 180° of the Angle
Table 1
Comparison of the main outcomes of past studies comparing 180° and 360° of SLT.
| Author, year | Shibata et al. 2012 | Ozen et al. 2020 | Goyal et al. 2010 | Nagar et al. 2005 | Type of study | RCS | RCT | RCT | RCT |
| 180° | F/U (mths) | 36 | 6 | 1 | 12 | # of eyes | 35 | 26 | 19 | 49 | Mean preop. IOP (mmHg) | 19.5 | 27.4 | 26 | n/a | Mean reduction (mmHg) | 2.6 | 9.1 | 6.1 | n/a | % IOP reduction | 13.3 | 33.2 | 23.6 | n/a | Proportion with 20% IOP reduction | n/a | 73.1 | 72.1 | 65 | 360° | F/U (mths) | 36 | 6 | 1 | 12 | # of eyes | 34 | 26 | 18 | 44 | Mean preop. IOP (mmHg) | 21.0 | 27.7 | 25.5 | n/a | Mean reduction (mmHg) | 5.6 | 10.3 | 5.7 | n/a | % IOP reduction | 26.7 | 37.2 | 22.4 | n/a | Proportion with 20% IOP reduction | n/a | 76.9 | 89.5 | 82 |
|
|
F/U = maximum follow-up period; RCS = retrospective cohort study; RCT = randomized clinical trial; IOP = intraocular pressure; mmHg = millimeters of mercury.
|