Research Article
Effectiveness of Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty Applied to 360° vs. 180° of the Angle
Table 3
Comparison of average IOP reductions between the 180° and 360° SLT groups.
| IOP reduction | 180° | 360° | value |
| Week 6 | n | 190 | 248 | | Average IOP reduction (mmHg ± SD) | 2.85 ± 1.9 | 3.16 ± 2.05 | 0.44 | ≥20% IOP reduction (%) | 40 | 48 | 0.134 | Mean medication reduction | 0.05 ± 0.93 | 0.06 ± 0.89 | 0.98 |
| Year 1 | n | 166 | 189 | | Average IOP reduction (mmHg ± SD) | 2.97 ± 2.06 | 3.40 ± 2.22 | 0.39 | ≥20% IOP reduction (%) | 34 | 42 | 0.248 | Mean medication reduction | 0.08 ± 0.91 | 0.11 ± 0.82 | 0.88 |
| Year 2 | n | 75 | 87 | | Average IOP reduction (mmHg ± SD) | 2.21 ± 2.02 | 2.43 ± 1.81 | 0.33 | ≥20% IOP reduction (%) | 29 | 48 | 0.01 | Mean medication reduction | 0.08 ± 0.96 | 0.14 ± 0.91 | 0.73 |
|
|
IOP = intraocular pressure; mm Hg = millimeters of mercury; (SD) = standard deviation; n = number of eyes at follow-up visit.
|