Comparison of Laser Iridotomy and Lensectomy Outcomes for Acute Primary Angle Closure

Table 4

Summary of previous studies on the treatment outcomes of acute primary angle closure.

Author	Treatment	Eyes	Follow-up	BSCVA (logMAR)	Intraocular pressure (mmHg)	Endothelial cell density (cells/mm^2)
Jacobi et al. [2]	PI	32	≥6 months	0.55 ± 0.23	20.1 ± 4.2	N. A.
	Lensectomy	43		0.18 ± 0.21	17.8 ± 3.4
Su et al. [4]	Lensectomy	16	3 months	0.73 ± 0.53	10.7 ± 2.8
Park et al. [5]	LI	32	2 years	0.36 ± 0.24	15.7 ± 1.3	1880 ± 422
	Lensectomy	16		0.30 ± 0.29	13.2 ± 1.2	2113 ± 333
Li et al. [8]	Lensectomy	31	6 months	0.83 ± 0.21	13.7 ± 3.6	N. A.
Fea et al. [9]	LI or lensectomy	57	5 years	0.37 ± 0.49	13.4 ± 2.8	1923.9 ± 497.1
Noh et al. [10]	Lensectomy	16	6 months	0.23 ± 0.16	12.1 ± 2.2	1912.8 ± 457.7
	Vitrectomy and lensectomy	10		0.19 ± 0.14	13.3 ± 1.7	2317.7 ± 510.3
	LI	34		0.70 ± 0.75	15.0 ± 9.1	N. A.
Lin YH. et al. [15]	Lensectomy after LI	23	12 months	0.52 ± 0.41	13.0 ± 6.9
	Lensectomy	24		0.57 ± 0.43	12.7 ± 17.9
Current	LI	29	≥3 months	0.16 ± 0.53	12.3 ± 2.6	2295.9 ± 658.2
	Lensectomy	35		0.01 ± 0.20	12.6 ± 2.8	2244.1 ± 622.0

N.A. = not applicable; PI = peripheral iridectomy; LI = laser iridotomy; BSCVA = best spectacle-corrected visual acuity; logMAR = logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution.