Research Article

Efficacy and Predictive Factors of Oral Spironolactone Treatment in Chronic Central Serous Chorioretinopathy

Table 2

Changes in visual acuity and imaging data between the responder group and the nonresponder group.

Baseline1 month3 months6 months

Responder group, 24 eyes
BCVA (logMAR) (decimal equivalent)0.17 ± 0.280.16 ± 0.280.09 ± 0.370.09 ± 0.21
0.7 ± 0.50.7 ± 0.50.8 ± 0.40.8 ± 0.6
SRF area (mm2)0.30 ± 0.140.13 ± 0.110.03 ± 0.050
CMT (μm)339.22 ± 77.75261.50 ± 56.45209.00 ± 40.18189.44 ± 31.42
SFCT (μm)497.50 ± 99.36388.50 ± 128.81362.28 ± 102.02364.67 ± 102.21
Nonresponder group, 18 eyes
BCVA (logMAR) (decimal equivalent)0.27 ± 0.270.26 ± 0.260.17 ± 0.160.18 ± 0.30
0.5 ± 0.50.5 ± 0.50.7 ± 0.70.7 ± 0.5
SRF area (mm2)0.58 ± 0.260.28 ± 0.160.24 ± 0.210.15 ± 0.10
CMT (μm)430.86 ± 100.49328.39 ± 75.09297.61 ± 108.10266.21 ± 56.03
SFCT (μm)365.50 ± 119.04341.93 ± 111.45320.43 ± 106.01329.07 ± 107.09

BCVA, best-corrected visual acuity; SRF, subretinal fluid; CMT, central macular thickness; SFCT, subfoveal choroidal thickness. compared to the responder group using the Wilcoxon signed-rank sum test. compared to the responder group using an independent sample Student’s t-test.