Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Osteoporosis
Volume 2012, Article ID 129760, 6 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/129760
Research Article

Sex- and Age-Related Differences in Bone Microarchitecture in Men Relative to Women Assessed by High-Resolution Peripheral Quantitative Computed Tomography

1Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
2Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism and Nutrition, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
3Division of Epidemiology, Department of Health Sciences Research, College of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA

Received 5 September 2011; Accepted 31 October 2011

Academic Editor: Pawel Szulc

Copyright © 2012 Shreyasee Amin and Sundeep Khosla. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. R. Muller, T. Hildebrand, and P. Ruegsegger, “Non-invasive bone biopsy: a new method to analyse and display the three- dimensional structure of trabecular bone,” Physics in Medicine and Biology, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 145–164, 1994. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. D. Ulrich, B. Rietbergen, A. Laib, and P. Ruegsegger, “Mechanical analysis of bone and its microarchitecture based on in vivo voxel images,” Technology and Health Care, vol. 6, no. 5-6, pp. 421–427, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. E. Seeman and P. D. Delmas, “Bone quality—the material and structural basis of bone strength and fragility,” New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 354, no. 21, pp. 2212–2261, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. R. Müller, T. Hildebrand, H. J. Häuselmann, and P. Rüegsegger, “In vivo reproducibility of three-dimensional structural properties of noninvasive bone biopsies using 3D-pQCT,” Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, vol. 11, no. 11, pp. 1745–1750, 1996. View at Google Scholar
  5. A. Laib, “Ridge number density: a new parameter for in vivo bone structure analysis,” Bone, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 541–546, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  6. A. Laib, H. J. Hauselmann, and P. Ruegsegger, “In vivo high resolution 3D-QCT of the human forearm,” Technology and Health Care, vol. 6, no. 5-6, pp. 329–337, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. J. A. MacNeil and S. K. Boyd, “Accuracy of high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography for measurement of bone quality,” Medical Engineering and Physics, vol. 29, no. 10, pp. 1096–1105, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. S. Khosla, B. L. Riggs, E. J. Atkinson et al., “Effects of sex and age on bone microstructure at the ultradistal radius: a population-based noninvasive in vivo assessment,” Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 124–131, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. A. M. Parfitt, C. H. E. Mathews, and A. B. Villanueva, “Relationships between surface, volume, and thickness of iliac trabecular bone in aging and in osteoporosis. Implications for the microanatomic and cellular mechanisms of bone loss,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 72, no. 4, pp. 1396–1409, 1983. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. A. J. Burghardt, H. R. Buie, A. Laib, S. Majumdar, and S. K. Boyd, “Reproducibility of direct quantitative measures of cortical bone microarchitecture of the distal radius and tibia by HR-pQCT,” Bone, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 519–528, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. S. Kirmani, D. Christen, G. H. Van Lenthe et al., “Bone structure at the distal radius during adolescent growth,” Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 1033–1042, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. A. M. Parfitt, M. K. Drezner, F. H. Glorieux et al., “Bone histomorphometry: standardization of nomenclature, symbols, and units. Report of the ASBMR Histomorphometry Nomenclature Committee,” Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 595–610, 1987. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. A. Laib and P. Rüegsegger, “Calibration of trabecular bone structure measurements of in vivo three-dimensional peripheral quantitative computed tomography with 28-μm-resolution microcomputed tomography,” Bone, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 35–39, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. M. Sode, A. J. Burghardt, G. J. Kazakia, T. M. Link, and S. Majumdar, “Regional variations of gender-specific and age-related differences in trabecular bone structure of the distal radius and tibia,” Bone, vol. 46, no. 6, pp. 1652–1660, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. H. M. MacDonald, K. K. Nishiyama, J. Kang, D. A. Hanley, and S. K. Boyd, “Age-related patterns of trabecular and cortical bone loss differ between sexes and skeletal sites: a population-based HR-pQCT study,” Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 50–62, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. M. Burrows, D. Liu, S. Moore, and H. McKay, “Bone microstructure at the distal tibia provides a strength advantage to males in late puberty: an HR-pQCT study,” Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 1423–1432, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. Q. Wang, X. F. Wang, S. Iuliano-Burns, A. Ghasem-Zadeh, R. Zebaze, and E. Seeman, “Rapid growth produces transient cortical weakness: a risk factor for metaphyseal fractures during puberty,” Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, vol. 25, no. 7, pp. 1521–1526, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. M. J. Silva and L. J. Gibson, “Modeling the mechanical behavior of vertebral trabecular bone: effects of age-related changes in microstructure,” Bone, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 191–199, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. N. Dalzell, S. Kaptoge, N. Morris et al., “Bone micro-architecture and determinants of strength in the radius and tibia: age-related changes in a population-based study of normal adults measured with high-resolution pQCT,” Osteoporosis International, vol. 20, no. 10, pp. 1683–1694, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. A. J. Burghardt, G. J. Kazakia, S. Ramachandran, T. M. Link, and S. Majumdar, “Age- and gender-related differences in the geometric properties and biomechanical significance of intracortical porosity in the distal radius and tibia,” Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 983–993, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. N. Vilayphiou, S. Boutroy, P. Szulc et al., “Finite element analysis performed on radius and tibia HR-pQCT images and fragility fractures at all sites in men,” Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 965–973, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  22. P. Szulc, S. Boutroy, N. Vilayphiou, A. Chaitou, P. D. Delmas, and R. Chapurlat, “Cross-sectional analysis of the association between fragility fractures and bone microarchitecture in older men: the STRAMBO study,” Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 1358–1367, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar