Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Osteoporosis
Volume 2016 (2016), Article ID 1424582, 11 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/1424582
Research Article

Cross-Calibration of GE Healthcare Lunar Prodigy and iDXA Dual-Energy X-Ray Densitometers for Bone Mineral Measurements

1Kuopio Musculoskeletal Research Unit (KMRU), Surgery, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Eastern Finland, 70211 Kuopio, Finland
2Department of Applied Physics, University of Eastern Finland, 70211 Kuopio, Finland
3Department of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine, Kuopio University Hospital, 70029 Kuopio, Finland
4Department of Orthopaedics, Traumatology and Hand Surgery, Kuopio University Hospital, 70029 Kuopio, Finland
5Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Kuopio University Hospital, 70029 Kuopio, Finland
6Institute of Clinical Medicine, Psychiatry, University of Eastern Finland, 70211 Kuopio, Finland
7Departments of Psychiatry, Kuopio University Hospital, 70029 Kuopio, Finland
8South-Savonia Hospital District, 50520 Mikkeli, Finland
9North Karelia Central Hospital, 80210 Joensuu, Finland
10SOSTERI, 57120 Savonlinna, Finland
11SOTE, 74101 Iisalmi, Finland
12Lapland Hospital District, 96101 Rovaniemi, Finland
13Clinic of Child Psychiatry, University Hospital of Oulu, 90029 Oulu, Finland
14School of Computing, University of Eastern Finland, 70211 Kuopio, Finland
15Diagnostic Imaging Centre, Kuopio University Hospital, 70029 Kuopio, Finland

Received 16 December 2015; Revised 8 March 2016; Accepted 27 March 2016

Academic Editor: David L. Kendler

Copyright © 2016 J. Saarelainen et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. J. A. Shepherd, Y. Lu, K. Wilson et al., “Cross-calibration and minimum precision standards for dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry: the 2005 ISCD Official Positions,” Journal of Clinical Densitometry, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 31–36, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. G. M. Blake, E. J. Harrison, and J. E. Adams, “Dual X-ray absorptiometry: cross-calibration of a new fan-beam system,” Calcified Tissue International, vol. 75, no. 1, pp. 7–14, 2004. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. J. Saarelainen, R. Honkanen, E. Vanninen et al., “Cross-calibration of lunar DPX-IQ and DPX dual-energy X-ray densitometers for bone mineral measurements in women: effect of body anthropometry,” Journal of Clinical Densitometry, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 320–329, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. Y. J. Choi, B. J. Lee, H. C. Lim, and Y.-S. Chung, “Cross-calibration of iDXA and prodigy on spine and femur scans in Korean adults,” Journal of Clinical Densitometry, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 450–455, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. H. Hull, Q. He, J. Thornton et al., “iDXA, prodigy, and DPXL dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry whole-body scans: a cross-calibration study,” Journal of Clinical Densitometry, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 95–102, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. D. Krueger, N. Vallarta-Ast, M. Checovich, D. Gemar, and N. Binkley, “BMD measurement and precision: a comparison of GE lunar prodigy and iDXA densitometers,” Journal of Clinical Densitometry, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 21–25, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. K. Hind, W. Cooper, B. Oldroyd, A. Davies, and L. Rhodes, “A cross-calibration study of the GE-lunar iDXA and prodigy for the assessment of lumbar spine and total hip bone parameters via three statistical methods,” Journal of Clinical Densitometry, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 86–92, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. L. A. Rhodes, W. Cooper, B. Oldroyd, and K. Hind, “Cross-calibration of a GE iDXA and Prodigy for total and regional body bone parameters: the importance of using cross-calibration equations for longitudinal monitoring after a system upgrade,” Journal of Clinical Densitometry, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 496–504, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. M. Tuppurainen, R. Honkanen, H. Kröger, S. Saarikoski, and E. Alhava, “Osteoporosis risk factors, gynaecological history and fractures in perimenopausal women—the results of the baseline postal enquiry of the Kuopio Osteoporosis Risk Factor and Prevention Study,” Maturitas, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 89–100, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. L. Rosenthall, “Range of change of measured BMD in the femoral neck and total hip with rotation in women,” Journal of Bone and Mineral Metabolism, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 496–499, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. J. M. Bland and D. G. Altman, “Applying the right statistics: analyses of measurement studies,” Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 85–93, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. S. A. Cawte, D. Pearson, D. J. Green, W. B. Maslanka, C. G. Miller, and A. T. Rogers, “Cross-calibration, precision and patient dose measurements in preparation for clinical trials using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry of the lumbar spine,” The British Journal of Radiology, vol. 72, pp. 354–362, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. D. Pearson, S. A. Cawte, and D. J. Green, “A comparison of phantoms for cross-calibration of lumbar spine DXA,” Osteoporosis International, vol. 13, no. 12, pp. 948–954, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. G. M. Blake and I. Fogelman, “The role of DXA bone density scans in the diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis,” Postgraduate Medical Journal, vol. 83, no. 982, pp. 509–517, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. D. Pearson, B. Horton, and D. J. Green, “Cross calibration of DXA as part of an equipment replacement program,” Journal of Clinical Densitometry, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 287–294, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. M. K. Covey, D. L. Smith, J. K. Berry, and E. D. Hacker, “Importance of cross-calibration when replacing DXA scanners: QDR4500W and Discovery Wi,” Journal of Nursing Measurement, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 155–170, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. J. A. Shepherd, S. L. Morgan, and Y. Lu, “Comparing BMD results between two similar DXA systems using the generalized least significant change,” Journal of Clinical Densitometry, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 237–242, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. T. J. Beck, A. C. Looker, C. B. Ruff, H. Sievanen, and H. W. Wahner, “Structural trends in the aging femoral neck and proximal shaft: analysis of the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry data,” Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, vol. 15, no. 12, pp. 2297–2304, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. M. T. C. Liang, S. Bassin, D. Dutto et al., “Bone mineral density and leg muscle strength in young caucasian, hispanic, and asian women,” Journal of Clinical Densitometry, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 157–164, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. S. Ishii, J. A. Cauley, G. A. Greendale, M. E. Danielson, N. Safaei Nili, and A. Karlamangla, “Ethnic differences in composite indices of femoral neck strength,” Osteoporosis International, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 1381–1390, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. S. V. Eastwood, T. Tillin, A. Wright et al., “Estimation of CT-derived abdominal visceral and subcutaneous adipose tissue depots from anthropometry in europeans, south asians and african caribbeans,” PLoS ONE, vol. 8, no. 9, Article ID e75085, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. K. W. Gaither, K. G. Faulkner, E. C. Osterm, J. K. Backman, L. S. Avecilla, and M. R. McClung, “Variation in calibration among like-manufacturer DXA systems,” Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, vol. 11, supplement 1, p. 119, 1996. View at Google Scholar
  23. M. Peacock, K. A. Buckwalter, S. Persohn, T. N. Hangartner, M. J. Econs, and S. Hui, “Race and sex differences in bone mineral density and geometry at the femur,” Bone, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 218–225, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. K. Ganda, T. V. Nguyen, and N. Pocock, “Gender disparity in BMD conversion: a comparison between Lunar and Hologic densitometers,” Archives of Osteoporosis, vol. 9, no. 1, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. W. W. K. Koo, M. Hammami, R. J. Shypailo, and K. J. Ellis, “Bone and body composition measurements of small subjects: discrepancies from software for fan-beam dual energy X-ray absorptiometry,” Journal of the American College of Nutrition, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 647–650, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. R. J. Shypailo and K. J. Ellis, “Bone assessment in children: comparison of fan-beam DXA analysis,” Journal of Clinical Densitometry, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 445–453, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. J. Pearson, J. Dequeker, J. Reeve et al., “Dual X-ray absorptiometry of the proximal femur: normal European values standardized with the European spine phantom,” Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 315–324, 1995. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. L. A. Kaminsky, C. Ozemek, K. L. Williams, and W. Byun, “Precision of total and regional body fat estimates from dual-energy X-ray absorptiometer measurements,” The Journal of Nutrition, Health & Aging, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 591–594, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. J. Malouf, S. DiGregorio, L. Del Rio et al., “Fat tissue measurements by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry: cross-calibration of 3 different fan-beam instruments,” Journal of Clinical Densitometry, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 212–222, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. D. Stöckl, K. Dewitte, and L. M. Thienpont, “Validity of linear regression in method comparison studies: is it limited by the statistical model or the quality of the analytical input data?” Clinical Chemistry, vol. 44, no. 11, pp. 2340–2346, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus