Patients’ Views on Medical Events in Lung Cancer Screening as Teachable Moments for Smoking Behaviour Change: A Systematic Review and Metasynthesis

Table 2

Quality appraisal of reviewed studies.

Criteria	Golden et al. [20]	Kathuria et al. [21]	Kummer et al. [22]	Meltzer et al. [23]	Mishra et al. [24]	Park et al. [25]	Rowland et al. [26]	Simmons et al. [27]	Wells et al. [28]	Young et al. [29]	Zeliadt et al. [30]
Was there a clear statement of the aims?	1	1	1	1	1	1	0.5	1	1	1	1
Is a qualitative methodology appropriate?	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1
Was the research design appropriate to address the aims of the research?	0.5	0.5	0.5	1	0.5	0.5	1	1	0.5	1	0.5
Was the recruitment strategy appropriate to the aims of the research?	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	0.5	1
Was the data collected in a way that addressed the research issue?	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	0.5	1	1
Has the relationship between researcher and participants been adequately considered?	0	1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0.5	0	0
Have ethical issues been taken into consideration?	1	1	1	0	1	1	0.5	0	1	0.5	1
Was the data analysis sufficiently rigorous?	1	1	1	0.5	1	1	1	1	0.5	1	1
Is there a clear statement of findings?	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1
How valuable is the research?	0.5	0.5	0.5	1	1	0.5	0.5	1	0.5	1	0
Total	8	9	9	7.5	8.5	8	7.5	8	7.5	8	7.5