Review Article

Effects of Smoking on COVID-19 Management and Mortality: An Umbrella Review

Table 2

Quality ratings of included studies based on NIH quality assessment (QA) tool for case series studies.

First author (# of ref)QuestionRating by reviewers
123456789# 1# 2

Alghamdi, S.A. [29]YesYesN/AYesN/AYesN/AYesYesGoodGood
Baker, J [30]YesYesN/AYesN/AYesN/AYesYesGoodGood
Farsalinos, K [31]NoYesN/AYesN/AYesN/AYesYesGoodFair
Gonzalez-Rubio, J [32]NoYesN/AYesN/ANoN/ANoYesFairPoor
Grundy, E. J [33]YesYesN/AYesN/ANoN/ANoYesFairFair
Gulsen, A [34]YesYesN/AYesN/AYesN/AYesYesGoodGood
Hou, H [35]YesYesN/AYesN/AYesN/AYesYesGoodGood
Kang, S [36]NoNoN/AYesN/ANoN/AYesYesFairFair
Karanasos, A [27]YesYesN/AYesN/AYesN/AYesYesGoodGood
Kumar, R [37]YesNoN/AYesN/AYesN/ANoYesFairGood
Li, J [38]NoYesN/ANoN/ANoN/AYesNoPoorPoor
Luo, S [39]YesYesN/AYesN/ANoN/ANoNoFairPoor
Mahamat-Saleh, Y [40]YesYesN/AYesN/AYesN/ANoYesGoodGood
Mattey-Mora, PP [41]NoYesN/AYesN/ANoN/ANoNoPoorFair
Mesas, AE [42]YesYesN/AYesN/ANoN/AYesYesFairGood
Minh, LHN [43]YesYesN/AYesN/AYesN/AYesYesGoodGood
Patanavanich, R [44]YesYesN/AYesN/AYesN/AYesYesGoodGood
Patanavanich, R [45]YesYesN/AYesN/AYesN/AYesYesGoodGood
Plasencia-Urizarri, TM [46]YesNoN/AYesN/AYesN/AYesNoFairPoor
Pranata, R [47]YesNoN/AYesN/ANoN/AYesYesGoodGood
Reddy, RK [28]YesYesN/AYesN/AYesN/AYesYesGoodGood
Sanchez-Ramirez, DC [48]YesYesN/AYesN/AYesN/AYesYesGoodGood
Taylor, EH [49]NoYesN/AYesN/ANoN/AYesYesGoodFair
Umnuaypornlert, A [50]YesYesN/AYesN/AYesN/AYesYesGoodGood
Vardavas, C.I [18]NoYesN/AYesN/AYesN/AYesYesGoodGood
Zhang, H [51]YesYesN/AYesN/AYesN/AYesYesGoodGood
Zhang, T [52]NoYesN/AYesN/ANoN/AYesYesFairGood

Note: NIH: National Institutes of Health; CD: cannot determine; NR: not reported; NA: not applicable. The NIH quality assessment tool for case series studies (https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health-topics/study-quality-assessment-tools) contains nine questions: 1 = Was the study question or objective clearly stated?, 2 = Was the study population clearly and fully described, including a case definition?, 3 = Were the cases consecutive?, 4 = Were the subjects comparable?, 5 = Was the intervention clearly described?, 6 = Were the outcome measures clearly defined, valid, reliable, and implemented consistently across all study participants?, 7 = Was the length of follow-up adequate?, 8 = Were the statistical methods well-described?, 9 = Were the results well-described? (source: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; National Institutes of Health; U.S. Department of Health and Human Services) https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health-topics/study-quality-assessment-tools.