Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Pregnancy
Volume 2011 (2011), Article ID 293516, 5 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/293516
Research Article

Labour and Neonatal Outcome in Small for Gestational Age Babies Delivered Beyond 36+0 Weeks: A Retrospective Cohort Study

1Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Bronovo Hospital, Bronovolaan 5, 2597 AX The Hague, The Netherlands
2Department of Obstetrics, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
3Department of Obstetrics, Leiden University Medical Centre, P.O. Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands

Received 29 August 2010; Revised 24 October 2010; Accepted 8 November 2010

Academic Editor: Sean Blackwell

Copyright © 2011 K. E. Boers et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. S. Jarvis, S. V. Glinianaia, M. G. Torrioli et al., “Cerebral palsy and intrauterine growth in single births: European collaborative study,” The Lancet, vol. 362, no. 9390, pp. 1106–1111, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. B. Clausson, S. Cnattingius, and O. Axelsson, “Preterm and term births of small for gestational age infants: a population-based study of risk factors among nulliparous women,” British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol. 105, no. 9, pp. 1011–1017, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. D. D. Mcintire, S. L. Bloom, B. M. Casey, and K. J. Leveno, “Birth weight in relation to morbidity and mortality among newborn infants,” New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 340, no. 16, pp. 1234–1238, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. M. S. Kramer, M. Olivier, F. H. McLean, D. M. Willis, and R. H. Usher, “Impact of intrauterine growth retardation and body proportionality on fetal and neonatal outcome,” Pediatrics, vol. 86, no. 5, pp. 707–713, 1990. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. T. C. Chang, S. C. Robson, J. A. D. Spencer, and S. Gallivan, “Prediction of perinatal morbidity at term in small fetuses: comparison of fetal growth and Doppler ultrasound,” British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol. 101, no. 5, pp. 422–427, 1994. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. C. M. Koopmans, D. Bijlenga, H. Groen et al., “Induction of labour versus expectant monitoring for gestational hypertension or mild pre-eclampsia after 36 weeks' gestation (HYPITAT): a multicentre, open-label randomised controlled trial,” The Lancet, vol. 374, no. 9694, pp. 979–988, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  7. F. P. J. M. Vrouenraets, F. J. M. E. Roumen, C. J. G. Dehing, E. S. A. Van Den Akker, M. J. B. Aarts, and E. J. T. Scheve, “Bishop score and risk of cesarean delivery after induction of labor in nulliparous women,” Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 105, no. 4, pp. 690–697, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. N. Van Gemund, A. Hardeman, S. A. Scherjon, and H. H. H. Kanhai, “Intervention rates after elective induction of labor compared to labor with a spontaneous onset: a matched cohort study,” Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 133–138, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. A. S. Maslow and A. L. Sweeny, “Elective induction of labor as a risk factor for cesarean delivery among low-risk women at term,” Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 95, no. 6, pp. 917–922, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. M. G. Van Pampus, S. A. Scherjon, J. W. Briët, J. R. B. J. Brouwers, and J. M. M. Brouwers, “Uterine hyperstimulation following cervix ripening with dinoprostone in a vaginal insert system,” Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde, vol. 148, no. 39, pp. 1942–1943, 2004. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. M. S. Kramer, K. Demissie, H. Yang, R. W. Platt, R. Sauve, and R. Liston, “The contribution of mild and moderate preterm birth to infant mortality,” Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 284, no. 7, pp. 843–849, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  12. K. M. Tomashek, C. K. Shapiro-Mendoza, M. J. Davidoff, and J. R. Petrini, “Differences in mortality between late-preterm and term singleton infants in the United States, 1995–2002,” The Journal of Pediatrics, vol. 151, no. 5, pp. 450–456, 2007. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. K. E. Boers, D. Bijlenga, B. W. J. Mol et al., “Disproportionate intrauterine growth intervention trial at term: DIGITAT,” BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, vol. 7, article 12, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. M. A. Brown, M. D. Lindheimer, M. De Swiet, A. Van Assche, and J. M. Moutquin, “The classification and diagnosis of the hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: statement from the International Society for the Study of Hypertension in Pregnancy (ISSHP),” Hypertension in Pregnancy, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. ix–xiv, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. G. J. Kloosterman, “On intrauterine growth. The significance of prenatal care,” International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, vol. 8, pp. 895–912, 1970. View at Google Scholar
  16. R. Hershkovitz, O. Erez, E. Sheiner et al., “Comparison study between induced and spontaneous term and preterm births of small-for-gestational-age neonates,” European Journal of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, vol. 97, no. 2, pp. 141–146, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. G. Ohel and M. Ruach, “Perinatal outcome of idiopathic small for gestational age pregnancies at term: the effect of antenatal diagnosis,” International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 29–32, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. A. Jahn, O. Razum, and P. Berle, “Routine screening for intrauterine growth retardation in Germany: low sensitivity and questionable benefit for diagnosed cases,” Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, vol. 77, no. 6, pp. 643–648, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. S. P. Chauhan, J. N. Martin, C. E. Henrichs, J. C. Morrison, and E. F. Magann, “Maternal and perinatal complications with uterine rupture in 142,075 patients who attempted vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: a review of the literature,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 189, no. 2, pp. 408–417, 2003. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. J. Gardosi, A. Chang, B. Kalyan, D. Sahota, and E. M. Symonds, “Customised antenatal growth charts,” Lancet, vol. 339, no. 8788, pp. 283–287, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. A. T. N. Tita, M. B. Landon, C. Y. Spong et al., “Timing of elective repeat cesarean delivery at term and neonatal outcomes,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 360, pp. 111–120, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  22. S. W. Roberts, K. J. Leveno, J. E. Sidawi, M. J. Lucas, and M. A. Kelly, “Fetal acidemia associated with regional anesthesia for elective cesarean delivery,” Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 85, no. 1, pp. 79–83, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. M. M. L. Van Den Hove, C. Willekes, F. J. M. E. Roumen, and S. A. Scherjon, “Intrauterine growth restriction at term: Induction or spontaneous labour? Disproportionate intrauterine growth intervention trial at term (DIGITAT): a pilot study,” European Journal of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, vol. 125, no. 1, pp. 54–58, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus