Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Pregnancy
Volume 2011 (2011), Article ID 362518, 5 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/362518
Research Article

Prelabour Caesarean Section following IVF/ICSI in Older-Term Nulliparous Women: Too Precious to Push?

1Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, University Hospital, Vrije Universiteit (VUB), Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090 Brussels, Belgium
2The Flemish Centre for the Study of Perinatal Epidemiology (SPE), Hallepoortlaan 27 B, 1060 Brussels, Belgium

Received 14 July 2011; Accepted 15 August 2011

Academic Editor: Jacob Bar

Copyright © 2011 E. Gillet et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. F. Menacker, E. Declercq, and M. F. Macdorman, “Cesarean delivery: background, trends, and epidemiology,” Seminars in Perinatology, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 235–241, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. V. H. Coleman, H. Lawrence, and J. Schulkin, “Rising cesarean delivery rates the impact of cesarean delivery on maternal request,” Obstetrical and Gynecological Survey, vol. 64, no. 2, pp. 115–119, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. B. A. Bettes, V. H. Coleman, S. Zinberg et al., “Cesarean delivery on maternal request: obstetrician-gynecologists' knowledge, perception, and practice patterns,” Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 109, no. 1, pp. 57–66, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. S. J. Robson, W. S. Tan, A. Adeyemi, and K. B. G. Dear, “Estimating the rate of cesarean section by maternal request: anonymous survey of obstetricians in Australia,” Birth, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 208–212, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. T. Nilstun, M. Habiba, G. Lingman, R. Saracci, M. Da Frè, and M. Cuttini, “Cesarean delivery on maternal request: can the ethical problem be solved by the principlist approach?” BMC Medical Ethics, vol. 9, article 11, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. S. R. Miesnik and B. J. Reale, “A review of issues surrounding medically elective cesarean delivery,” JOGNN, vol. 36, no. 6, pp. 605–615, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. J. A. Gamble and D. K. Creedy, “Women's request for a cesarean section: a critique of the literature,” Birth, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 256–263, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. C. McCourt, J. Weaver, H. Statham, S. Beake, J. Gamble, and D. K. Creedy, “Elective cesarean section and decision making: a critical review of the literature,” Birth, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 65–79, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. A. O. Ilesanmi, O. Fawole, D. O. Olaleye, and A. Arowojolu, “Pregnancy outcome in the elderly primigravidae,” Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 40–43, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. M. Carolan, “The project: having a baby over 35 years,” Women and Birth, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 121–126, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. R. Lampinen, K. Vehvilainen-Julkunen, and P. Kankkunen, “A review of pregnancy in women over 35 years of age,” Open Nursing Journal, vol. 3, pp. 33–38, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  12. H. L. Minkoff and R. Berkowitz, “The myth of the precious baby,” Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 106, no. 3, pp. 607–609, 2005. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. M. Dhont, P. De Sutter, G. Ruyssinck, G. Martens, and A. Bekaert, “Perinatal outcome of pregnancies after assisted reproduction: a case- control study,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 181, no. 3, pp. 688–695, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. B. Källén, O. Finnström, K. G. Nygren, P. Otterblad Olausson, and U.-B. Wennerholm, “In vitro fertilisation in Sweden: obstetric characteristics, maternal morbidity and mortality,” BJOG, vol. 112, no. 11, pp. 1529–1535, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. E. Maman, E. Lunenfeld, A. Levy, H. Vardi, and G. Potashnik, “Obstetric outcome of singleton pregnancies conceived by in vitro fertilization and ovulation induction compared with those conceived spontaneously,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 70, no. 2, pp. 240–245, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. B. E. Reubinoff, S. Friedler, A. Samueloff, J. G. Schenker, M. Ben-Haim, and A. Lewin, “Is the obstetric outcome of in vitro fertilized singleton gestations different from natural ones? A controlled study,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 67, no. 6, pp. 1077–1083, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. F. M. Helmerhorst, D. A. M. Perquin, D. Donker, and M. J. N. C. Keirse, “Perinatal outcome of singletons and twins after assisted conception: a systematic review of controlled studies,” British Medical Journal, vol. 328, no. 7434, pp. 261–264, 2004. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. E. A. Sullivan, M. G. Chapman, Y. A. Wang, and G. D. Adamson, “Population-based study of cesarean section after in vitro fertilization in Australia,” Birth, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 184–191, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. Y. Adler-Levy, E. Lunenfeld, and A. Levy, “Obstetric outcome of twin pregnancies conceived by in vitro fertilization and ovulation induction compared with those conceived spontaneously,” European Journal of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, vol. 133, no. 2, pp. 173–178, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. R. A. Jackson, K. A. Gibson, Y. W. Wu, and M. S. Croughan, “Perinatal outcomes in singletons following in vitro fertilization: a meta-analysis,” Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 103, no. 3, pp. 551–563, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. S. McDonald, K. Murphy, J. Beyene, and A. Ohlsson, “Perinatal outcomes of in vitro fertilization twins: a systematic review and meta-analyses,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 193, no. 1, pp. 141–152, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. H. Cammu, G. Martens, and M. J. Keirse, “Mothers' level of education and childbirth interventions: a population-based study in Flanders, Northern Belgium,,” Birth, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 191–199, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. T. Bergholt, B. Østberg, J. Legarth, and T. Weber, “Danish obstetricians' personal preference and general attitude to elective cesarean section on maternal request: a nation-wide postal survey,” Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, vol. 83, no. 3, pp. 262–266, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. J. Gerris, “IVF and ICSI reimbursed in Belgium,” Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, vol. 21, no. 5, p. 135, 2004. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. J. Gerris, P. De Sutter, D. De Neubourg et al., “A real-life prospective health economic study of elective single embryo transfer versus two-embryo transfer in first IVF/ICSI cycles,” Human Reproduction, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 917–923, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. A. T. N. Tita, M. B. Landon, C. Y. Spong et al., “Timing of elective repeat cesarean delivery at term and neonatal outcomes,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 360, no. 2, pp. 111–120, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus