The Role of Placental Homeobox Genes in Human Fetal Growth Restriction

Murthi, Padma; Rajaraman, Gayathri; Brennecke, Shaun Patrick; Kalionis, Bill

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/548171

Journal of Pregnancy

On this page

Abstract Introduction Conclusions References Copyright Related Articles

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2011 | Article ID 548171 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/548171

The Role of Placental Homeobox Genes in Human Fetal Growth Restriction

Padma Murthi,^1,2Gayathri Rajaraman,^1,2,3Shaun Patrick Brennecke,^1,2and Bill Kalionis^1,2

Academic Editor: David F. Lewis

Received23 Nov 2010

Accepted17 Feb 2011

Published12 Apr 2011

Abstract

Fetal growth restriction (FGR) is an adverse pregnancy outcome associated with significant perinatal and paediatric morbidity and mortality, and an increased risk of chronic disease later in adult life. One of the key causes of adverse pregnancy outcome is fetal growth restriction (FGR). While a number of maternal, fetal, and environmental factors are known causes of FGR, the majority of FGR cases remain idiopathic. These idiopathic FGR pregnancies are frequently associated with placental insufficiency, possibly as a result of placental maldevelopment. Understanding the molecular mechanisms of abnormal placental development in idiopathic FGR is, therefore, of increasing importance. Here, we review our understanding of transcriptional control of normal placental development and abnormal placental development associated with human idiopathic FGR. We also assess the potential for understanding transcriptional control as a means for revealing new molecular targets for the detection, diagnosis, and clinical management of idiopathic FGR.

1. Introduction

1.1. Fetal Growth Restriction

The regulation of fetal growth is multifactorial and complex. Normal fetal growth is determined by the genetically predetermined growth potential and further modulated by maternal, fetal, placental, and environmental factors [1]. Fetal growth restriction (FGR), also known as intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR), is a failure of the fetus to reach its full growth potential for gestation age. FGR is commonly defined as a birth weight of less than the 10th percentile for gestation, together with evidence of fetal health compromise such as oligohydramnios and asymmetric fetal growth involving an increased head to abdominal circumference ratio. Evidence of such underlying pathology allows clinicians to discriminate between FGR and healthy small for gestation age (SGA) babies that are otherwise normal. FGR is associated with an increased risk of perinatal complications such as prematurity [2], stillbirth [2–5], neonatal morbidity [5, 6], and mortality [5, 6]. Adverse outcomes for FGR neonates include impaired neuropsychological development [7, 8] leading to reduced intelligence quotients [9, 10]. While FGR can be attributed to obvious fetal (e.g., chromosomal abnormalities), placental (e.g., obvious infarcts), maternal (e.g., tobacco smoking), and environmental factors (e.g., viral infections), about 70% of cases do not have a known cause and are termed idiopathic FGR. Idiopathic FGR is frequently associated with placental insufficiency [11]. Cordocentesis studies (sampling of umbilical fetal arterial or venous blood) show features consistent with chronically inadequate transplacental oxygen exchange between the mother and FGR fetus [11]. Clinical features of idiopathic FGR pregnancies include abnormal umbilical artery Doppler velocimetry [12], oligohydramnios [13], and asymmetric fetal growth [14].

1.2. Pathology of Placental Dysfunction in FGR

Typically, the placentae in idiopathic FGR are smaller than their gestation age-matched controls [15], and they show obvious morphological defects. Macroscopic placental lesions [12] are frequently evident, whilst microscopic defects such as reduced trophoblast proliferation and abnormal villous vasculature with shorter, less branched terminal villi [16] are also observed. Another significant functional defect is uteroplacental ischemia due to failure of the placental extravillous cytotrophoblast cells to effectively carry out the critical processes of invasion, transformation, and remodeling of the spiral arteries in the maternal decidua [17].

At the cellular level, trophoblast function is modulated in an autocrine/paracrine manner by growth factors, their binding proteins, and extracellular matrix components of the placenta (reviewed in [18, 19]). This modulation of trophoblast cell function involves various extracellular signals, signalling molecules, and consequent receptor activation in the signalling pathway. Disruption of various important signalling pathways is observed in placental pathologies that are associated with abnormal trophoblast function [20].

A consequence of altered placental function in idiopathic FGR is reduced transfer of oxygen, nutrients, and growth factors to the fetus, which restricts fetal growth [21]. The changes observed in FGR placentae are consistent with early developmental defects [17], but the developmental genes involved and their molecular mechanism of action are not known. Several longitudinal studies have demonstrated a possible causative role for genetic and familial factors, as yet unidentified, in human FGR [22, 23].

Current knowledge of the molecular mechanisms of FGR is limited. Various attempts to understand the molecular basis of FGR using microarray and proteomics approaches have revealed significant differences between FGR and uncomplicated control [24–26] on term placentae and have shed little light on the regulatory mechanisms that underlie the early events leading to idiopathic FGR. Murine model systems, particularly those amenable to genetic manipulation, are therefore of crucial importance in revealing potentially important regulatory genes that may play a role in the early stages of human FGR. In many animal model systems, early developmental stages are controlled at the level of transcription factors.

2. Transcriptional Control of Placental Development

Growth factors and signalling molecules represent the cue to which a cell responds by either maintaining or altering its state of differentiation [27]. However, it is the transcription factors, located within the cell nucleus, which determine how this cue is interpreted and what the cellular response will be. Transcription factors achieve this by regulating expression of their target genes within the cell. A large number of different transcription factors play essential roles in cellular development and differentiation of various cell types, including the trophoblast cell type in the placenta [28, 29]. Transcription factors are categorised into a few large families such as the zinc finger, leucine zipper, helix-loop-helix, helix-turn-helix, and homeobox genes [30, 31].

3. Homeobox Genes

Homeobox genes (also known as homeotic genes) were originally discovered in the fruit fly Drosophila, where they act as transcriptional regulators to control embryonic morphogenesis (reviewed in [32–34]). These genes contain a highly conserved 180 base pair homeobox sequence, which encodes a 60 amino acid homeodomain. Structural analyses have shown that the homeodomain consists of an evolutionarily conserved helix-turn-helix motif that binds to the DNA. The specificity of this binding allows homeodomain proteins to activate or repress the expression of batteries of downstream target genes [35].

Most important is that homeobox genes are directly or indirectly involved in a variety of developmental disorders, diseases, and cancers (reviewed in [36]). Homeobox genes are subdivided into the “clustered” homeobox genes known as “HOX” genes, the “nonclustered” divergent or orphan HOX-like genes, as well as several distinct classes of atypical homeodomain containing genes. The HOX family plays a fundamental role in the embryonic morphogenesis and were identified in mammals and vertebrates based on their sequence homology to the genes of the Drosophila HOM-C [37, 38]. In mice and humans, the HOX complex is comprised of 39 genes that are arranged into four separate chromosomal clusters designated HOX A, B, C, and D [39, 40].

Homeobox genes are grouped together into various subfamilies based on a variety of criteria such as their functional and structural characteristics, and these subfamilies of homeobox genes are essential for the control of specific aspects of cellular growth and differentiation [28, 29, 41]. Evidence for the deregulation of certain homeobox genes in cancer and other diseases provides support for the idea that homeobox genes are vital for normal mammalian development. Furthermore, characterisation of such homeobox genes may lead to a greater understanding of the developmental mechanisms, which are disrupted in a variety of disease states. There is evidence that normal homeobox gene expression can be altered during a diseased state, such as decreased expression of Cdx2 in the intestinal epithelium of patients with colorectal cancers and decreased Meox2 expression in brain endothelial cells of patients affected by Alzheimer’s disease [36, 42]. Thus, homeobox genes could be used as disease markers or potential therapeutic targets of diseases, such as cancer, diabetic wound healing, lymphedema, Alzheimer’s disease, and stroke due to atherosclerosis [43–45].

Homeobox gene mutations have also been shown to cause human congenital disorders such as Waardenburg's syndrome type 1 [46, 47] and Aniridia [48]. The homeobox gene HuP2 has been found to be mutated in patients with Waardenburg's syndrome [46, 47], and the congenital eye disorder Aniridia caused by a mutation in the homeobox gene designated AN [48].

The clustered homeobox genes, known as HOX, play a fundamental role in embryological morphogenesis. HOX gene mutations are implicated in various human malformations such as hand-foot-genital syndrome, Mowat-Wilson Syndrome, and Duanes Retraction Syndrome (reviewed in [36]). There is also an association between mutation in HOX genes and autism spectrum disorders [49]. More recently, the Aristaless-related homeobox gene, ARX, was found to be associated with both X-linked mental retardation and epilepsy [50, 51].

Mouse knockouts have also provided genetic proof that homeobox genes regulate embryonic organogenesis and morphogenesis [52–54]. For example, targeted disruption of the Hlx homeobox gene (the homolog of human HLX) in the mouse shows that Hlx plays a fundamental role in visceral organogenesis [55]. Studies have demonstrated that Hlx mutant mice resulted in developing gut and liver diverticulum defects. In addition, Hlx mutation also showed a defect in cell proliferation and resulted in embryonic death due to liver failure [55]. Furthermore, Hlx is expressed in mesenchymal cell types during organogenesis in the mouse placenta [56]. Additionally, recent studies from our laboratory have confirmed that placental morphology is severely affected in Hlx mutant mice (Murthi et al. unpublished data).

3.1. Homeobox Genes in Murine Placental Development

Given the highly important role of homeobox genes in embryonic and adult development, it is not surprising that homeobox genes also play major roles in controlling extraembryonic development of the placenta. Homeobox genes regulate mouse placental cell functions and targeted gene mutations of homeobox genes in the mouse produce FGR-like effects. For example, homeobox gene mouse mutants, Esx1 and Dlx3, produce FGR-like effects in mice including restricted fetal growth and placental defects [57, 58]. Esx1 expression is restricted to the placenta and is not expressed in the embryo. Thus, in the Esx1 mutant mouse, altered placental function is the cause of restricted fetal growth. Dlx3 and Esx1 mutant mice show specific defects in the labyrinthine trophoblast of the chorioallantoic placenta [57, 58]. In addition, the 3 beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase gene (3β-HSD), which is important for the biosynthesis of all active steroid hormones, is a target of the Dlx3 homeobox gene in the mouse [59]. Therefore, homeobox genes control important trophoblast functions in the mouse placenta.

The homeobox gene Cdx2 is expressed in the embryonic trophectoderm and in the spongiotrophoblast component of the placenta at later stages of development and is implicated in the patterning of the extraembryonic membranes of the mouse placenta [60]. The finding that Cdx2 homozygous null mutant mice die between 3.5 and 5.5 days as a consequence of failed implantation suggests that this homeobox gene may play a role in controlling trophoblast differentiation [61].

The placenta specific–homeobox gene (Psx) also affects mouse placental development. The Psx transcript was first detected at embryonic day 8.5 and expression persisted until birth. Psx mRNA is expressed in extraembryonic tissues, mainly in the placenta, but not in the fetus [62]. Further studies have shown that the Psx homeobox gene plays a unique role in the function of differentiated trophoblast cells in the murine placenta [63].

Mouse homeobox gene knockouts have also provided evidence that homeobox genes regulate vascular development and angiogenesis in the mouse placenta (reviewed in [29, 41, 64]). Therefore, in animal model systems, homeobox genes control trophoblast and endothelial cell functions during placental development.

3.2. A Strategy for Understanding Transcriptional Control in Normal and FGR-Affected Placentae

Our strategy for understanding the molecular mechanisms of placental function in normal and FGR-affected human placentae involved (i) determining the spatiotemporal expression pattern of homeobox genes during placental development that have an “evolutionary history” of regulating cell fate decisions during embryonic or adult development, (ii) determining whether specific homeobox gene expression levels were changed in FGR-affected placentae compared with gestation matched controls, (iii) creating in vitro models of placental cultured cells that “mimic” homeogox gene expression changes observed on FGR by the use of loss- or gain-of function phenotypes using RNA interference systems or gene overexpression plasmids, and (iv) defining the biological functions of the target genes using in vitro models. These approaches have been proven very successful in identifying transcriptional control of endocrine functions during mouse placental development (reviewed in [28, 29]). Therefore, identification of the homeobox target genes in specialised cell types of the human placenta can reveal the molecular pathways responsible for important placental cell functions. These pathways may be affected in FGR. Using this novel approach, more recent studies in our laboratory have described a potential role for transcriptional control of homeobox gene HLX in the human placental trophoblast cells. In the following section, we will summarise our current understanding of homeobox gene HLX regulation in human placental development, more specifically to human extravillous trophoblast function, as well as give insights into novel mechanisms of trophoblast dysfunction observed in FGR-affected pregnancies.

(i) Spatiotemporal Expression Patterns of Homeobox Genes in the Placenta
Studies in the human placenta have focused mainly on identifying homeobox genes expressed in the normal placenta [65, 66], and those showing altered expression in trophoblastic cancers [67]. The homeobox genes we and others have identified to be of potential importance in the human placenta are DLX3 [59, 68, 69], DLX4 [70–72], MSX2 and GAX [70], ESX1L [58, 73], and HLX [74–77]. These genes are potential candidates for regulating epithelial-mesenchymal cell interactions in the human placenta. These genes are potential candidates for regulating epithelial-mesenchymal cell interactions in the human placenta. These genes are also expressed in the embryo and play major roles in embryonic development [78, 79]. Microarray expression profiling of placental trophoblast and endothelial cells revealed that novel placental homeobox genes TGIF, MEIS2E, LIM2, and SMAP31-12 are also highly expressed in trophoblast cells (Murthi et al. unpublished data).
Few functional studies have been carried out on human placental homeobox genes. One limited study reported that the inactivation of homeobox gene DLX4 resulted in altered rates of trophoblast cell apoptosis [72]. Homeobox gene DLX3 regulates the expression of the alpha subunit of hCG [59] and of 3-βHSD [69], both of which are important for placental trophoblast function.

3.3. Homeobox Genes in Human Placental Endothelial Cells

Knowledge of homeobox genes in human endothelial cells comes primarily from studies in the cardiovascular system employing cell culture models such as human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC). Homeobox genes are critical regulators of cardiovasculature development [80]. GAX is a negative regulator of angiogenesis [81]. HOXB3 promotes invasive behaviour of endothelial cells in response to angiogenic stimulation [54], whereas HOXD3 promotes capillary morphogenesis [82]. In HUVEC stimulated with VEGF, HEX acts as a negative regulator of angiogenesis [83]. Also in HUVEC, GAX is an inhibitor of endothelial cell activation in response to growth factors and tube formation [53].

Previous studies from our laboratory have demonstrated the expression of homeobox genes HLX, DLX3, DLX4, MSX2, and GAX in placental endothelial cells, and we showed that novel placental homeobox genes, such asTLX1, TLX2, TGIF, HEX, PHOX1, MEIS2, HOXB7, and LIM6 were also expressed in placental endothelial cells [84]. Our findings have highlighted the potential importance of these genes in the fundamental process of placental angiogenesis. Clearly, homeobox genes are important regulators of endothelial cell functions in the embryo and adult but their role in placental endothelial cells is yet to be determined.

(ii) Homeobox Gene Expression Levels Are Changed in FGR Placentae Compared with Gestation-Matched Controls
Previous studies from our laboratory determined the expression levels of several homeobox genes in a clinically well-defined idiopathic FGR-affected placentae and gestation-matched controls [71, 73, 75]. The cohort of FGR-affected pregnancies that was employed was carefully defined in clinical terms and represented the severe end of spectrum of idiopathic FGR. The general inclusion criterion for FGR cases was a birth weight less than the 10th centile for gestation age, using Australian growth charts. FGR cases were classified as idiopathic if there was evidence of an underlying pathology, judged by the presence of at least two of the following antenatal ultrasound diagnostic criteria: abnormal umbilical artery Doppler flow velocimetry, oligohydramnios as determined by amniotic fluid index (AFI) <7, or asymmetric growth of the fetus as measured from the HC (head circumference) to AC (abdominal circumference) ratio (>1.2). Fetuses showed reduced growth by the late second and early third trimester. Reduced villous tree elaboration, diminished surface area of the placenta, and abnormal end-diastolic blood flow in the umbilical artery are characteristic of pregnancies with severely growth-restricted infants [15, 16]. Homeobox genes HLX [75] and ESX1L [73] showed decreased expression in FGR-affected placentae compared with matched controls.
The pattern of normal human fetal growth is complex. Increases in the rates of fetal weight gain and length increase are not parallel throughout pregnancy. Evidence suggests that the maximal growth rate for length is seen in the second trimester, whereas the maximal rate of weight gain is early in the third trimester [75, 83]. Guihard-Costa et al. [85] in a longitudinal study of human fetal growth have reported a linear growth rate until 26 weeks and, thereafter, the growth rate decreased. In our studies, a rapid decline in the levels of both HLX and ESX1L expression was observed from 27-week gestation, which may correspond to the decline in the growth rate of the fetus seen in the third trimester [81, 86].
Our studies represented the most comprehensive and extensive analyses of homeobox genes in placental pathologies undertaken. However, homeobox gene DLX4 showed increased expression [71] in FGR-affected placentae. Our observation of altered homeobox gene expression levels, that is, decreased (HLX) or increased (DLX4) expression in FGR-placentae compared with gestation matched controls, prompted us to identify the downstream target genes which would be affected by changed homeobox gene levels.

(iii) Creating In Vitro Models of Placental Cultured Cells That “Mimic” Homeobox Gene Expression Changes Observed on FGR
Homeobox gene HLX is the most characterised in the human placenta. The HLX gene (also known as HLX1, H2.0-like homeobox or HB24; OMIM 142995) is a member of the homeobox family of genes, with homology to the Drosophila homeobox gene H2.0. A comparison of HLX orthologs in human and mouse showed that the genes share similar organization, with four exons and three introns and 85.4% identity between the human and mouse proteins, suggesting a similar function in both species [87]. The HLX homeobox gene was shown to have high expression in haematopoietic progenitor cells, and lower expression levels in activated lymphocytes [88].
Our studies demonstrated that HLX is expressed primarily in the proliferating cytotrophoblast cell types in early placental development and suggested that reduced levels of HLX are required for cytotrophoblast differentiation and that dysregulation of HLX may result in aberrant cytotrophoblast proliferation and differentiation, contributing to placental pathologies [74].
Furthermore, to identify the functional role of reduced HLX levels observed in FGR, we simulated reduced expression levels in extravillous trophoblast derived cell lines SGHPL4 and HTR8-SV neousing short-interference RNA (siRNA) specific for HLX. These two transformed trophoblast-derived cell lines are well-characterized first trimester-derived human extravillous cytotrophoblast cell lines and are capable of proliferation, migration, and invasion. The results from this study were not cell line specific, since consistent effects were seen in both the cell lines tested.
Our findings provided evidence of HLX regulation by cytokines, CSF-1, and growth factors such as HGF, and established that HLX is an important regulator for signal transduction mediated proliferation and migration of human extravillous trophoblast cells [76, 77] suggesting that HLX may be of pathological significance.

(iv) Defining the Biological Functions of the Target Genes Using In Vitro Models
Understanding the precise regulatory mechanisms through which homeobox genes achieve molecular control during placental development requires the identification of target genes within the downstream developmental pathways.
Genes involved in regulating cellular mechanisms such as mitotic rate, cell-cell adhesion, and cell migration during morphogenesis have been identified as target genes for many homeobox genes [89–99]. Thus, homeobox genes act as “master regulators” of development and control transcription by binding to regulatory elements in the promoter regions of target genes [38].
In the last two decades, the purification, cloning, and characterisation of several homeobox transcription factors, together with transgenic mouse models, have increased our knowledge of the molecular basis of placental development. Whilst loss-of-function studies in the mouse model clearly demonstrate that homeobox genes such as Cdx2, Cdx4, Hoxa13, and dlx3 are critical for murine placental development [60, 68, 100], the target genes regulated by these homeobox genes have not been investigated in either the murine or human placenta.

3.4. Identification of HLX Target Genes

Previous studies showed that inhibition of HLX by antisense oligonucleotide methods impaired CD34+ bone marrow cell proliferation in response to stimulation by cytokines, whilst inducing differentiation of these cells. Moreover, HLX inhibition also reduced the levels of c-myc, c-fos, cyclin B, and mRNA expression [88]. These cell cycle regulatory genes were predicted to be involved in the function of trophoblast cells [101]. By using siRNA-mediated inactivation of HLX approach, we investigated the mechanisms by which HLX mediates extravillous trophoblast function in normal and FGR-affected placentae. We used siRNA in trophoblast in vitro models such as SGHPL-4 and HTR-8/SVneo and detected changes in gene expression using pathway-specific low density PCR arrays for MAP- (mitogen-activated signaling-)kinase signaling pathways. The downstream target genes of HLX were identified as RB1, MYC, EGR1, CDKN1C, ELK1, CCNB1, and JUN. These findings were further validated suggesting the observations were not only consistent in two independent trophoblast cell lines, SGHPL-4 and HTR-8/SVneo, but was also reflected in FGR-affected human placental tissue. Most importantly, we identified four HLX downstream target genes CCNB1, MYC, CDKN1C, and JUN, which were previously identified as HLX target genes in haematopoietic progenitor cells [88] as targets of HLX in cultured trophoblast cells. Thus, HLX homeobox gene targets cell cycle regulatory genes in two independent cell types.

In the following section, we have described further analyses of candidate downstream target genes of HLX and their level of expression and potential contribution to functional abnormalities observed in FGR-affected placentae.

Retinoblastoma-1 (RB1, also known as Rb) is a tumor suppressor gene that was first discovered in genetic studies of hereditary retinoblastoma [102]. RB1 also has a role in other cancers including osteosarcoma and plays an important role in regulating cell proliferation and differentiation [103]. The product of the RB1 gene is a nuclear phosphoprotein that may act as an inhibitor of cell proliferation [104]. Additionally, Schubert et al. [105] have demonstrated that RB1 is a downstream target of the GCMa/Gcm1 transcription factor in the mouse placenta. Therefore, RB1 has been shown to be a direct target of transcription factors. In mice, the constitutive knockout of RB1 causes embryonic lethality resulting from defects in placental function [106] reviewed in [107]. Wu and coworkers [106] have demonstrated that reduction of RB1 gene expression in the mouse model system resulted in excessive proliferation of trophoblast cells and a severe disruption of the normal labyrinth architecture in the placenta. This was accompanied by a decrease in vascularisation and a reduction in placental transport function and ultimately embryonic death [106].

Our findings demonstrated that RB1 is a direct or indirect downstream target of the homeobox gene HLX in cultured human trophoblast cells [108]. Furthermore, RB1 is expressed in the proximal region of proliferating trophoblast cells in the trophoblast cell column [109], where HLX is also expressed [74]. This provided supporting evidence HLX may act as a regulator of RB1 in trophoblast cells and that HLX-mediated RB1 expression in trophoblast cells may reduce trophoblast proliferation. We also observed that RB1 showed the highest relative increase in expression levels in FGR-affected placentae compared with control placentae [108]. These data suggest RB1 is a negative regulator of cell proliferation and that increased RB1 expression levels in FGR may reduce trophoblast proliferation and result in a fewer number of trophoblast cells available to migrate and invade into the maternal decidua. This reduction in trophoblast proliferation may also lead to the shallow, inadequate remodeling of the maternal spiral arteries associated with FGR.

MYC is a proto-oncogene that is overexpressed in a wide range of human cancers. This cell cycle regulator gene is part of the postreceptor intracellular signaling pathway for regulation of cell proliferation by growth factors [110]. Depending on the cellular context, MYC proteins induce either cell proliferation or apoptosis and they require cooperation with other oncoproteins and inhibition of apoptotic pathways to transform cells [111]. Previous studies have determined that MYC is expressed in the actively proliferating extravillous trophoblast cells of the human placenta [112–114], where we have shown HLX to be highly expressed [74]. Results from our study demonstrated that MYC mRNA expression was significantly increased with HLX inactivation in cultured trophoblast cells, suggesting that MYC is a direct or indirect downstream target gene of HLX [108].

Targeted disruption of c-myc gene (homolog of MYC) in the mouse model system resulted in severe placental defects including morphological abnormalities [115]. Several embryonic developmental defects were also reported including abnormalities in the heart, liver, and neural tube formation. More importantly, embryonic death was also observed in c-myc knock-out mice due to placental insufficiency [115]. Our findings showed that MYC expression was significantly increased in FGR-affected human placentae, consistent with the increase in MYC expression in HLX inactivated cultured trophoblast cells [108]. This suggested that MYC, as a downstream target gene of HLX, is a molecular target associated with idiopathic human FGR. Therefore, HLX-mediated increase in MYC expression may contribute to increased apoptosis that is frequently associated with FGR.

CDKN1C (p57/kip2) is a member of the CIP/KIP family of cyclin-dependent kianse inhibitors and has been shown to inhibit several cyclin-dependent kinase kinase/cyclin complexes and is a regulator of cell proliferation [116]. Mutations of CDKN1C are implicated in sporadic cancers and Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome suggesting that it is a tumor suppressor candidate. Larson et al. [117] have suggested that decreased CDKN1C expression may be involved in human breast carcinogenesis in vivo. CDKN1C has recently been recognized as a maternally imprinted gene, supporting its role for genomic imprinting in the regulation of embryonic implantation and development and placental growth, as well as in the pathogenesis of proliferative trophoblastic diseases [118]. In the normal placenta, strong nuclear CDKN1C expression was observed in extravillous trophoblast, cytotrophoblast, and implantation-site interstitial trophoblast, but was absent in syncytiotrophoblast [118]. This expression of CDKN1C in the human placenta is consistent with the expression pattern of HLX from our study [74].

Studies have shown that targeted disruption of CDKN1C in the mouse model system results in severe placental defects [119]. CDKN1C knock-out mice have displayed an array of pre-eclampsia symptoms, including placental abnormalities, hypertension, proteinuria, and premature labour [119]. Results from our own findings showed that CDKN1C expression is significantly reduced in cultured trophoblast cells, therefore, is a direct or indirect target candidate gene of HLX in cultured trophoblast cells [108]. This suggests that HLX-mediated reduction of CDKN1C expression may reduce trophoblast proliferation. Further confirmation of CDKN1C mRNA expression in FGR-affected human placentae, also show a significant decrease in human idiopathic FGR compared with gestation-matched controls.

ELK1, as a member of the ETS family, acts as a transcriptional factor for the MET gene [120], which is expressed in placental cytotrophoblasts [121]. As with HLX, ELK1 is also expressed in human extravillous trophoblast cells [122] and is suggested to play a role in the regulation of cell proliferation and migration [123]. ETS transcription factors are also critical for human uterine decidualisation [124]. Human decidual fibroblasts expressed significantly less mRNA for the decidualisation markers prolactin, IGFBP-I, EBAF, TIMP3, decorin, and laminin in the presence of an antisense oligonucleotide that blocks the translation of ETS mRNA when compared with decidual fibroblast cells exposed to a control oligonucleotide [124].

Given our previous findings of HLX expression in the human placenta [74] and in the importance of HLX in trophoblast proliferation [77] and migration [76], ELK1 is a potential target gene of HLX in the control of trophoblast cell proliferation and migration. Consistently, results from our observation showed that ELK1 expression was also significantly decreased in FGR-affected human placentae. Therefore, the cell culture model where siRNA-mediated reduction of HLX reduces ELK1 was consistent with decreased levels of HLX and decreased levels of ELK1 in human FGR.

CCNB1 is a regulatory gene expressed predominantly during the G2/M phase of the cell cycle, functionally involved in cell mitosis. Studies have shown expression of CCNB1 in the villous trophoblast and the extravillous trophoblast cell types of the human placenta [125, 126], which also correlates with placental HLX expression from our findings [74]. This current study showed that CCNB1 mRNA expression was significantly reduced in cultured trophoblast cells with HLX inactivation, suggesting that CCNB1 to be a downstream target gene of HLX. CCNB1 expression was also significantly reduced in FGR-affected placentae compared with controls. Therefore, our findings showed that the cell culture model was consistent with the observed changes seen in HLX levels in FGR and changes in CCNB1 levels and suggested a causative role between reduced HLX levels and reduced CCNB1 levels in FGR.

JUN is a member of the AP-1 family of transcription factors and is implicated as a key regulator of human extravillous trophoblast proliferation, invasion, and differentiation [127]. Not surprisingly, JUN is also strongly expressed in the highly proliferative extravillous trophoblast cells of the human placenta [127], consistent with HLX expression in the human placenta [74]. JUN plays a key role in coordinating steroid hormone actions in a variety of tissues [128] and is induced by the steroid hormone oestrogen in the human endometrium. Salmi and Rutanen [129] have demonstrated a strong expression of JUN in human proliferative endometrium and that JUN expression is decreased in the human decidua throughout pregnancy [130].

Our own findings showed significantly decreased JUN expression with HLX gene reduction in cultured trophoblast cells. This suggests, as a downstream target of HLX, JUN is regulated by HLX, either directly or indirectly, in order to affect proliferation, invasion, and differentiation of extravillous trophoblasts. Consistently, results showed that JUN expression was also significantly decreased in FGR-affected human placentae compared with control placentae. Therefore, decreased JUN expression, either directly or indirectly by HLX, may result in anomalous trophoblast functions associated with FGR. Furthermore, HLX-mediated JUN dysregulation of trophoblast differentiation and invasion can lead to abnormal spiral artery remodeling by endovascular trophoblasts, as these endovascular trophoblasts need to differentiate from cytotrophoblasts and invade the maternal spiral arteries for enhanced blood flow during pregnancy [16].

Thus, the candidate downstream target genes of a homeobox gene, HLX, are significantly altered in human idiopathic FGR-affected placentae, compared with gestation-matched controls. Most importantly, the findings of our own study demonstrated that in vitro models for siRNA-mediated knockdown of HLX expression in placental trophoblast cells show consistent changes to those observed in human FGR where HLX levels are reduced. These results suggest that reduced levels of HLX seen in FGR cause direct or indirect effects on target genes that have been shown to be altered in FGR. Therefore, reduced HLX levels directly or indirectly cause gene expression changes in targets that have deleterious effects on trophoblast function.

4. Conclusions and Future Directions

Rapid progress in understanding placental development, and its regulatory molecules has been achieved in the last decade. Placental development, as does development of other embryonic organs, progresses through many step and some key regulators have now been identified. However, more work is required to complete the analyses of both molecular and cellular events on various human placental cell types remains. Our current understanding of how homeobox genes regulate trophoblast functions suggest that important aspects of regulation are conserved between the extraembryonic placenta and embryonic morphogenetic and differentiation events.

It is evident from our findings that homeobox genes such as HLX play a critical role in trophoblast function and involve molecular and cellular mechanisms that have been observed during differentiation and morphogenesis of the embryonic tissues. This may reflect the involvement of HLX in regulating the fundamental process of proliferation, the regulatory mechanisms of which are likely to be highly conserved. Studies of targets of other homeobox genes may reveal the regulation of more specialised placental cell functions.

The strategy we have employed has resulted in the identification of homeobox genes, which are expressed in normal placental development and that show altered expression in FGR. Functional assays following target gene inactivation in cultured cells reveal that homeobox genes control important functions in placental cells. The discovery of targets of homeobox genes has revealed genes, and pathways, not previously implicated in FGR. These target genes and pathways will be further assessed for their therapeutic and diagnostic potential in future.

References

J. Gardosi, A. Chang, B. Kalyan, D. Sahota, and E. M. Symonds, “Customised antenatal growth charts,” Lancet, vol. 339, no. 8788, pp. 283–287, 1992.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Gardosi, T. Mul, M. Mongelli, and D. Fagan, “Analysis of birthweight and gestational age in antepartum stillbirths,” British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol. 105, no. 5, pp. 524–530, 1998.
View at: Google Scholar
S. Cnattingius, B. Haglund, and M. S. Kramer, “Differences in late fetal death rates in association with determinants of small for gestational age fetuses: population based cohort study,” British Medical Journal, vol. 316, no. 7143, pp. 1483–1487, 1998.
View at: Google Scholar
J. F. Frøen, J. O. Gardosi, A. Thurmann, A. Francis, and B. Stray-Pedersen, “Restricted fetal growth in sudden intrauterine unexplained death,” Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, vol. 83, no. 9, pp. 801–807, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. S. Kramer, M. Olivier, F. H. McLean, D. M. Willis, and R. H. Usher, “Impact of intrauterine growth retardation and body proportionality on fetal and neonatal outcome,” Pediatrics, vol. 86, no. 5, pp. 707–713, 1990.
View at: Google Scholar
D. D. Mcintire, S. L. Bloom, B. M. Casey, and K. J. Leveno, “Birth weight in relation to morbidity and mortality among newborn infants,” New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 340, no. 16, pp. 1234–1238, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. Frisk, R. Amsel, and H. E. A. Whyte, “The importance of head growth patterns in predicting the cognitive abilities and literacy skills of small-for-gestational-age children,” Developmental Neuropsychology, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 565–593, 2002.
View at: Google Scholar
D. J. Taylor and P. W. Howie, “Fetal growth achievement and neurodevelopmental disability,” British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol. 96, no. 7, pp. 789–794, 1989.
View at: Google Scholar
R. L. Goldenberg, M. B. DuBard, S. P. Cliver et al., “Pregnancy outcome and intelligence at age five years,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 175, no. 6, pp. 1511–1515, 1996.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. D. Matte, M. Bresnahan, M. D. Begg, and E. Susser, “Influence of variation in birth weight within normal range and within sibships on IQ at age 7 years: cohort study,” British Medical Journal, vol. 323, no. 7308, pp. 310–314, 2001.
View at: Google Scholar
A. Ghidini, “Idiopathic fetal growth restriction: a pathophysiologic approach,” Obstetrical and Gynecological Survey, vol. 51, no. 6, pp. 376–382, 1996.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. M. Salafia, J. C. Pezzullo, V. K. Minior, and M. Y. Divon, “Placental pathology of absent and reversed end-diastolic flow in growth-restricted fetuses,” Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 90, no. 5, pp. 830–836, 1997.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Volante, D. Gramellini, S. Moretti, C. Kaihura, and G. Bevilacqua, “Alteration of the amniotic fluid and neonatal outcome,” Acta Biomedica de l'Ateneo Parmense, vol. 75, no. 1, pp. 71–75, 2004.
View at: Google Scholar
T. Vik, “Body proportions and early neonatal morbidity in small-for-gestational-age infants of successive births,” Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, Supplement, vol. 76, no. 165, pp. 76–81, 1997.
View at: Google Scholar
C. P. Chen, R. Bajoria, and J. D. Aplin, “Decreased vascularization and cell proliferation in placentas of intrauterine growth-restricted fetuses with abnormal umbilical artery flow velocity waveforms,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 187, no. 3, pp. 764–769, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Kingdom, B. Huppertz, G. Seaward, and P. Kaufmann, “Development of the placental villous tree and its consequences for fetal growth,” European Journal of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, vol. 92, no. 1, pp. 35–43, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. Chaddha, S. Viero, B. Huppertz, and J. Kingdom, “Developmental biology of the placenta and the origins of placental insufficiency,” Seminars in Fetal and Neonatal Medicine, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 357–369, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Bischof, A. Meisser, and A. Campana, “Paracrine and autocrine regulators of trophoblast invasion—a review,” Placenta, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. S55–S60, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Chakraborty, L. M. Gleeson, T. McKinnon, and P. K. Lala, “Regulation of human trophoblast migration and invasiveness,” Canadian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology, vol. 80, no. 2, pp. 116–124, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Xu, C. Chakraborty, and P. K. Lala, “Expression of tgf-β signaling genes in the normal, premalignant, and malignant human trophoblast: loss of smad3 in choriocarcinoma cells,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 287, no. 1, pp. 47–55, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. M. Mayhew, D. S. Charnock-Jones, and P. Kaufmann, “Aspects of human fetoplacental vasculogenesis and angiogenesis. III. Changes in complicated pregnancies,” Placenta, vol. 25, no. 2-3, pp. 127–139, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Devriendt, “Genetic control of intra-uterine growth,” European Journal of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, vol. 92, no. 1, pp. 29–34, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Ghezzi, M. G. Tibiletti, L. Raio et al., “Idiopathic fetal intrauterine growth restriction: a possible inheritance pattern,” Prenatal Diagnosis, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 259–264, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. M. Page, C. F. Kemp, D. J. Butlin, and P. J. Lowry, “Placental peptides as markers of gestational disease,” Reproduction, vol. 123, no. 4, pp. 487–495, 2002.
View at: Google Scholar
C. R. Roh, V. Budhraja, H. S. Kim, D. M. Nelson, and Y. Sadovsky, “Microarray-based identification of differentially expressed genes in hypoxic term human trophoblasts and in placental villi of pregnancies with growth restricted fetuses,” Placenta, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 319–328, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Okamoto, H. Endo, B. Kalionis et al., “IGFBP1 and Follistatin-like 3 genes are significantly up-regulated in expression profiles of the IUGR placenta,” Placenta, vol. 27, no. 2-3, pp. 317–321, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. A. Irving and P. K. Lala, “Functional role of cell surface integrins on human trophoblast cell migration: regulation by TGF-β, IGF-II, and IGFBP-1,” Experimental Cell Research, vol. 217, no. 2, pp. 419–427, 1995.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. C. Cross, L. Anson-Cartwright, and I. C. Scott, “Transcription factors underlying the development and endocrine functions of the placenta,” Recent Progress in Hormone Research, vol. 57, pp. 221–234, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. C. Cross, D. Baczyk, N. Dobric et al., “Genes, development and evolution of the placenta,” Placenta, vol. 24, no. 2-3, pp. 123–130, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. F. Johnson and S. L. McKnight, “Eukaryotic transcriptional regulatory proteins,” Annual Review of Biochemistry, vol. 58, pp. 799–839, 1989.
View at: Google Scholar
K. J. Woodside, H. Shen, C. Muntzel, J. A. Daller, C. L. Sommers, and P. E. Love, “Expression of Dlx and Lhx family homeobox genes in fetal thymus and thymocytes,” Gene Expression Patterns, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 315–320, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. McGinnis and R. Krumlauf, “Homeobox genes and axial patterning,” Cell, vol. 68, no. 2, pp. 283–302, 1992.
View at: Google Scholar
B. Favier and P. Dollé, “Developmental functions of mammalian Hox genes,” Molecular Human Reproduction, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 115–131, 1997.
View at: Google Scholar
V. E. Prince, “The Hox paradox: more complex(es) than imagined,” Developmental Biology, vol. 249, no. 1, pp. 1–15, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Levine and T. Hoey, “Homeobox proteins as sequence-specific transcription factors,” Cell, vol. 55, no. 4, pp. 537–540, 1988.
View at: Google Scholar
F. D. Nunes, F. C. de Almeida, R. Tucci, and S. C. de Sousa, “Homeobox genes: a molecular link between development and cancer,” Pesquisa Odontologica Brasileira, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 94–98, 2003.
View at: Google Scholar
D. Duboule and G. Morata, “Colinearity and functional hierarchy among genes of the homeotic complexes,” Trends in Genetics, vol. 10, no. 10, pp. 358–364, 1994.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. J. Gehring, M. Affolter, and T. Burglin, “Homeodomain proteins,” Annual Review of Biochemistry, vol. 63, pp. 487–526, 1994.
View at: Google Scholar
C. Cillo, A. Faiella, M. Cantile, and E. Boncinelli, “Homeobox genes and cancer,” Experimental Cell Research, vol. 248, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Cillo, M. Cantile, A. Faiella, and E. Boncinelli, “Homeobox genes in normal and malignant cells,” Journal of Cellular Physiology, vol. 188, no. 2, pp. 161–169, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Hemberger, J. C. Cross, H. H. Ropers, H. Lehrach, R. Fundele, and H. Himmelbauer, “UniGene cDNA array-based monitoring of transcriptome changes during mouse placental development,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 98, no. 23, pp. 13126–13131, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. J. Choi, C. J. Kim, Y. G. Cho et al., “Altered expression of CDX2 in colorectal cancers,” APMIS, vol. 114, no. 1, pp. 50–54, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. Wu, H. Guo, N. Chow et al., “Role of the MEOX2 homeobox gene in neurovascular dysfunction in Alzheimer disease,” Nature Medicine, vol. 11, no. 9, pp. 959–965, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. A. Mace, S. L. Hansen, C. Myers, D. M. Young, and N. Boudreau, “HOXA3 induces cell migration in endothelial and epithelial cells promoting angiogenesis and wound repair,” Journal of Cell Science, vol. 118, no. 12, pp. 2567–2577, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Kato, N. Sato, A. Takano et al., “Activation of placenta-specific transcription factor distal-less homeobox 5 predicts clinical outcome in primary lung cancer patients,” Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 14, no. 8, pp. 2363–2370, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Tassabehji, A. P. Read, V. E. Newton et al., “Waardenburg's syndrome patients have mutations in the human homologue of the Pax-3 paired box gene,” Nature, vol. 355, no. 6361, pp. 635–636, 1992.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. T. Baldwin, C. F. Hoth, J. A. Amos, E. O. Da-Silva, and A. Milunsky, “An exonic mutation in the HuP2 paired domain gene causes Waardenburg's syndrome,” Nature, vol. 355, no. 6361, pp. 637–638, 1992.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. C. T. Ton, H. Hirvonen, H. Miwa et al., “Positional cloning and characterization of a paired box- and homeobox-Containing gene from the aniridia region,” Cell, vol. 67, no. 6, pp. 1059–1074, 1991.
View at: Google Scholar
J. L. Ingram, C. J. Stodgell, S. L. Hyman, D. A. Figlewicz, L. R. Weitkamp, and P. M. Rodier, “Discovery of allelic variants of HOXA1 and HOXB1: genetic susceptibility to autism spectrum disorders,” Teratology, vol. 62, no. 6, pp. 393–405, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Hirose and A. Mitsudome, “X-Linked mental retardation and epilepsy: pathogenetic significance of ARX mutations,” Brain and Development, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 161–165, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Gécz, D. Cloosterman, and M. Partington, “ARX: a gene for all seasons,” Current Opinion in Genetics and Development, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 308–316, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. H. Gorski and K. Walsh, “Control of vascular cell differentiation by homeobox transcription factors,” Trends in Cardiovascular Medicine, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 213–220, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. H. Gorski and A. J. Leal, “Inhibition of endothelial cell activation by the homeobox gene Gax,” Journal of Surgical Research, vol. 111, no. 1, pp. 91–99, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Myers, A. Charboneau, I. Cheung, D. Hanks, and N. Boudreau, “Sustained expression of Homeobox D10 inhibits angiogenesis,” American Journal of Pathology, vol. 161, no. 6, pp. 2099–2109, 2002.
View at: Google Scholar
B. Hentsch, I. Lyons, R. Li et al., “Hlx homeo box gene is essential for an inductive tissue interaction that drives expansion of embryonic liver and gut,” Genes and Development, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 70–79, 1996.
View at: Google Scholar
T. J. Lints, L. Hartley, L. M. Parsons, and R. P. Harvey, “Mesoderm-specific expression of the divergent homeobox gene Hlx during murine embryogenesis,” Developmental Dynamics, vol. 205, no. 4, pp. 457–470, 1996.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Rossant and J. C. Cross, “Placental development: lessons from mouse mutants,” Nature Reviews Genetics, vol. 2, no. 7, pp. 538–548, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Li and R. R. Behringer, “Esx1 is an X-chromosome-imprinted regulator of placental development and fetal growth,” Nature Genetics, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 309–311, 1998.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Peng and A. H. Payne, “AP-2γ and the homeodomain protein distal-less 3 are required for placental-specific expression of the murine 3β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase VI gene, Hsd3b6,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 277, no. 10, pp. 7945–7954, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Beck, T. Erler, A. Russell, and R. James, “Expression of Cdx-2 in the mouse embryo and placenta: possible role in patterning of the extra-embryonic membranes,” Developmental Dynamics, vol. 204, no. 3, pp. 219–227, 1995.
View at: Google Scholar
K. Chawiengsaksophak, R. James, V. E. Hammond, F. Köntgen, and F. Beck, “Homeosis and intestinal tumours in Cdx2 mutant mice,” Nature, vol. 386, no. 6620, pp. 84–87, 1997.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. J. Han, AE. R. Park, D. Y. Sung, and J. Y. Chun, “Psx, a novel murine homeobox gene expressed in placenta,” Gene, vol. 207, no. 2, pp. 159–166, 1998.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Y. Chun, Y. J. Han, and K. Y. Ahn, “Psx homeobox gene is X-linked and specifically expressed in trophoblast cells of mouse placenta,” Developmental Dynamics, vol. 216, no. 3, pp. 257–266, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. Sapin, L. Blanchon, A. F. Serre, D. Lémery, B. Dastugue, and S. J. Ward, “Use of transgenic mice model for understanding the placentation: towards clinical applications in human obstetrical pathologies?” Transgenic Research, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 377–398, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Knofler, L. Saleh, S. Bauer et al., “Promoter elements and transcription factors involved in differentiation-dependent human chorionic gonadotrophin-α messenger ribonucleic acid expression of term villous trophoblasts,” Endocrinology, vol. 141, no. 10, pp. 3737–3748, 2000.
View at: Google Scholar
T. Loregger, J. Pollheimer, and M. Knöfler, “Regulatory transcription factors controlling function and differentiation of human trophoblast—a review,” Placenta, vol. 24, pp. S104–S110, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Asanoma, H. Kato, T. Inoue, T. Matsuda, and N. Wake, “Analysis of a candidate gene associated with growth suppression of choriocarcinoma and differentiation of trophoblasts,” Journal of Reproductive Medicine for the Obstetrician and Gynecologist, vol. 49, no. 8, pp. 617–626, 2004.
View at: Google Scholar
L. Han, M. D. Figueiredo, K. A. Berghorn et al., “Analysis of the gene regulatory program induced by the homeobox transcription factor Distal-less 3 in mouse placenta,” Endocrinology, vol. 148, no. 3, pp. 1246–1254, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. S. Roberson, S. Meermann, M. I. Morasso, J. M. Mulvaney-Musa, and T. Zhang, “A role for the homeobox protein Distal-less 3 in the activation of the glycoprotein hormone α subunit gene in choriocarcinoma cells,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 276, pp. 10016–10024, 2001.
View at: Google Scholar
L. M. Quinn, B. V. Johnson, J. Nicholl, G. R. Sutherland, and B. Kalionis, “Isolation and identification of homeobox genes from the human placenta including a novel member of the Distal-less family, DLX4,” Gene, vol. 187, no. 1, pp. 55–61, 1997.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Murthi, J. M. Said, V. L. Doherty et al., “Homeobox gene DLX4 expression is increased in idiopathic human fetal growth restriction,” Molecular Human Reproduction, vol. 12, no. 12, pp. 763–769, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Sun, X. Lu, L. Yin, F. Zhao, and Y. Feng, “Inhibition of DLX4 promotes apoptosis in choriocarcinoma cell lines,” Placenta, vol. 27, no. 4-5, pp. 375–383, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Murthi, V. L. Doherty, J. M. Said, S. Donath, S. P. Brennecke, and B. Kalionis, “Homeobox gene ESX1L expression is decreased in human pre-term idiopathic fetal growth restriction,” Molecular Human Reproduction, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 335–340, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Rajaraman, P. Murthi, L. Quinn, S. P. Brennecke, and B. Kalionis, “Homeodomain protein HLX is expressed primarily in cytotrophoblast cell types in the early pregnancy human placenta,” Reproduction, Fertility and Development, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 357–367, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Murthi, V. Doherty, J. Said, S. Donath, S. P. Brennecke, and B. Kalionis, “Homeobox gene HLX1 expression is decreased in idiopathic human fetal growth restriction,” American Journal of Pathology, vol. 168, no. 2, pp. 511–518, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Rajaraman, P. Murthi, S. P. Brennecke, and B. Kalionis, “Homeobox gene HLX is a regulator of HGF/c-met-mediated migration of human trophoblast-derived cell lines,” Biology of Reproduction, vol. 83, no. 4, pp. 676–683, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Rajaraman, P. Murthi, B. Leo, S. P. Brennecke, and B. Kalionis, “Homeobox gene HLX1 is a regulator of colony stimulating factor-1 dependent trophoblast cell proliferation,” Placenta, vol. 28, no. 10, pp. 991–998, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Kraus and T. Lufkin, “Mammalian DIx homeobox gene control of craniofacial and inner ear morphogenesis,” Journal of Cellular Biochemistry, vol. 76, no. 33, pp. 133–140, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Maas and M. Bei, “The genetic control of early tooth development,” Critical Reviews in Oral Biology and Medicine, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 4–39, 1997.
View at: Google Scholar
D. H. Gorski and K. Walsh, “Control of vascular cell differentiation by homeobox transcription factors,” Circulation Research, vol. 88, no. 1, pp. 7–8, 2001.
View at: Google Scholar
D. H. Gorski and A. J. Leal, “Inhibition of endothelial cell activation by the homeobox gene Gax,” Journal of Surgical Research, vol. 111, no. 1, pp. 91–99, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Boudreau, C. Andrews, A. Srebrow, A. Ravanpay, and D. A. Cheresh, “Induction of the angiogenic phenotype by Hox D3,” Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 139, no. 1, pp. 257–264, 1997.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Nakagawa, M. Abe, T. Yamazaki et al., “HEX acts as a negative regulator of angiogenesis by modulating the expression of angiogenesis-related gene in endothelial cells in vitro,” Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 231–237, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Murthi, U. Hiden, G. Rajaraman et al., “Novel homeobox genes are differentially expressed in placental microvascular endothelial cells compared with macrovascular cells,” Placenta, vol. 29, no. 7, pp. 624–630, 2008.
View at: Google Scholar
A. M. Guihard-Costa and C. J. Larroche, “Growth velocity of some fetal parameters II. Body weight, body length and head circumference,” Biology of the Neonate, vol. 62, no. 5, pp. 317–324, 1992.
View at: Google Scholar
N. J. Boudreau and J. A. Varner, “The homeobox transcription factor Hox D3 promotes integrin αβ expression and function during angiogenesis,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 279, no. 6, pp. 4862–4868, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. D. Bates, J. M. Wells, and B. Venkatesh, “Comparative genomics of the Hlx homeobox gene and protein: conservation of structure and expression from fish to mammals,” Gene, vol. 352, no. 1-2, pp. 45–56, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. H. Kehrl and Y. Deguchi, “Potential roles for two human homeodomain containing proteins in the proliferation and differentiation of human hematopoietic progenitors,” Leukemia and Lymphoma, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 173–176, 1993.
View at: Google Scholar
B. C. Meier, J. R. Price, G. E. Parker, J. L. Bridwell, and S. J. Rhodes, “Characterization of the porcine Lhx3/LIM-3/P-Lim LIM homeodomain transcription factor,” Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology, vol. 147, no. 1-2, pp. 65–74, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. Valarche, J. P. Tissier-Seta, M. R. Hirsch, S. Martinez, C. Goridis, and J. F. Brunet, “The mouse homeodomain protein Phox2 regulates Ncam promoter activity in concert with Cux/CDP and is a putative determinant of neurotransmitter phenotype,” Development, vol. 119, no. 3, pp. 881–896, 1993.
View at: Google Scholar
G. M. Edelman and F. S. Jones, “Developmental control of N-CAM expression by Hox and Pax gene products,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, vol. 349, no. 1329, pp. 305–312, 1995.
View at: Google Scholar
G. M. Edelman and F. S. Jones, “Gene regulation of cell adhesion: a key step in neural morphogenesis,” Brain Research Reviews, vol. 26, no. 2-3, pp. 337–352, 1998.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. S. Jones, C. Kioussi, D. W. Copertino, P. Kallunki, B. D. Holst, and G. M. Edelman, “Barx2, a new homeobox gene of the Bar class, is expressed in neural and craniofacial structures during development,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 94, no. 6, pp. 2632–2637, 1997.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. R. McWhirter, M. Goulding, J. A. Weiner, J. Chun, and C. Murre, “A novel fibroblast growth factor gene expressed in the developing nervous system is a downstream target of the chimeric homeodomain oncoprotein E2A-Pbx1,” Development, vol. 124, no. 17, pp. 3221–3232, 1997.
View at: Google Scholar
J. Drouin, B. Lamolet, T. Lamonerie, C. Lanctôt, and J. J. Tremblay, “The PTX family of homeodomain transcription factors during pituitary developments,” Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology, vol. 140, no. 1-2, pp. 31–36, 1998.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. W. Van Oostveen, J. J. Bijl, F. M. Raaphorst, J. J. M. Walboomers, and C. J. L. M. Meijer, “The role of Homeobox genes in normal hematopoiesis and hematological malignancies,” Leukemia, vol. 13, no. 11, pp. 1675–1690, 1999.
View at: Google Scholar
E. Boncinelli and R. Morgan, “Downstream of Otx2, or how to get a head,” Trends in Genetics, vol. 17, no. 11, pp. 633–636, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Dailey and C. Basilico, “Coevolution of HMG domains and homeodomains and the generation of transcriptional regulation by Sox/POU complexes,” Journal of Cellular Physiology, vol. 186, no. 3, pp. 315–328, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. N. Akin and A. J. Nazarali, “Hox genes and their candidate downstream targets in the developing central nervous system,” Cellular and Molecular Neurobiology, vol. 25, no. 3-4, pp. 697–741, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. van Nes, W. de Graaff, F. Lebrin, M. Gerhard, F. Beck, and J. Deschamps, “The Cdx4 mutation affects axial development and reveals an essential role of Cdx genes in the ontogenesis of the placental labyrinth in mice,” Development, vol. 133, no. 3, pp. 419–428, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. W. Morrish, J. Dakour, and H. Li, “Life and death in the placenta: new peptides and genes regulating human syncytiotrophoblast and extravillous cytotrophoblast lineage formation and renewal,” Current Protein and Peptide Science, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 245–259, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. G. Knudson, “Mutation and cancer: statistical study of retinoblastoma,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 68, no. 4, pp. 820–823, 1971.
View at: Google Scholar
A. Deshpande and P. W. Hinds, “The retinoblastoma protein in osteoblast differentiation and osteosarcoma,” Current Molecular Medicine, vol. 6, no. 7, pp. 809–817, 2006.
View at: Google Scholar
M. Jeanblanc, M. Mousli, R. Hopfner et al., “The retinoblastoma gene and its product are targeted by ICBP90: a key mechanism in the G1/S transition during the cell cycle,” Oncogene, vol. 24, no. 49, pp. 7337–7345, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. W. Schubert, N. Lamoureux, K. Kilian, L. Klein-Hitpass, and S. Hashemolhosseini, “Identification of integrin-α4, Rb1, and syncytin A as murine placental target genes of the transcription factor GCMa/Gcm,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 283, no. 9, pp. 5460–5465, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Wu, A. De Bruin, H. I. Saavedra et al., “Extra-embryonic function of Rb is essential for embryonic development and viability,” Nature, vol. 421, no. 6926, pp. 942–947, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. MacPherson, “Insights from mouse models into human retinoblastoma,” Cell Division, vol. 3, article no. 9, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Rajaraman, P. Murthi, N. Pathirage, S. P. Brennecke, and B. Kalionis, “Downstream targets of homeobox gene HLX show altered expression in human idiopathic fetal growth restriction,” American Journal of Pathology, vol. 176, no. 1, pp. 278–287, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Quenby, C. Brazeau, A. Drakeley, D. I. Lewis-Jones, and G. Vince, “Oncogene and tumour suppressor gene products during trophoblast differentiation in the first trimester,” Molecular Human Reproduction, vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 477–481, 1998.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. V. Dang, K. A. O'Donnell, and T. Juopperi, “The great MYC escape in tumorigenesis,” Cancer Cell, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 177–178, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Cappellen, T. Schlange, M. Bauer, F. Maurer, and N. E. Hynes, “Novel c-MYC target genes mediate differential effects on cell proliferation and migration,” EMBO Reports, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 70–76, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Roncalli, G. Bulfamante, G. Viale et al., “C-myc and tumour suppressor gene product expression in developing and term human trophoblast,” Placenta, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 399–409, 1994.
View at: Google Scholar
A. S. Goustin, C. Betsholtz, and S. Pfeifer-Ohlsson, “Coexpression of the sis and myc proto-oncogenes in developing human placenta suggests autocrine control of trophoblast growth,” Cell, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 301–312, 1985.
View at: Google Scholar
S. Pfeifer-Ohlsson, A. S. Goustin, and J. Rydnert, “Spatial and temporal pattern of cellular myc oncogene expression in developing human placenta: implications for embryonic cell proliferation,” Cell, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 585–596, 1984.
View at: Google Scholar
N. C. Dubois, C. Adolphe, A. Ehninger, R. A. Wang, E. J. Robertson, and A. Trumpp, “Placental rescue reveals a sole requirement for c-Myc in embryonic erythroblast survival and hematopoietic stem cell function,” Development, vol. 135, no. 14, pp. 2455–2465, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Matsuoka, M. C. Edwards, C. Bai et al., “p57(KIP2), a structurally distinct member of the p21(CIP1) Cdk inhibitor family, is a candidate tumor suppressor gene,” Genes and Development, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 650–662, 1995.
View at: Google Scholar
P. S. Larson, B. L. Schlechter, C. L. King et al., “CDKN1C/p57 is a candidate tumor suppressor gene in human breast cancer,” BMC Cancer, vol. 8, article no. 68, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Chilosi, E. Piazzola, M. Lestani et al., “Differential expression of p57(kip2), a maternally imprinted cdk inhibitor, in normal human placenta and gestational trophoblastic disease,” Laboratory Investigation, vol. 78, no. 3, pp. 269–276, 1998.
View at: Google Scholar
K. S. Knox and J. C. Baker, “Genome-wide expression profiling of placentas in the p57 model of pre-eclampsia,” Molecular Human Reproduction, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 251–263, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Paumelle, D. Tulashe, Z. Kherrouche et al., “Hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor activates the ETS1 transcription factor by a RAS-RAF-MEK-ERK signaling pathway,” Oncogene, vol. 21, no. 15, pp. 2309–2319, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Kauma, N. Hayes, and S. Weatherford, “The differential expression of hepatocyte growth factor and Met in human placenta,” Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 82, no. 3, pp. 949–954, 1997.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Takai, T. Ueda, H. Narahara, and I. Miyakawa, “Expression of c-Ets1 protein in normal human placenta,” Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation, vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 15–20, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Birchmeier, W. Birchmeier, E. Gherardi, and G. F. Vande Woude, “Met, metastasis, motility and more,” Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, vol. 4, no. 12, pp. 915–925, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. A. Kessler, J. K. Schroeder, A. K. Brar, and S. Handwerger, “Transcription factor ETS1 is critical for human uterine decidualization,” Molecular Human Reproduction, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 71–76, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
O. Genbacev, M. T. McMaster, and S. J. Fisher, “A repertoire of cell cycle regulators whose expression is coordinated with human cytotrophoblast differentiation,” American Journal of Pathology, vol. 157, no. 4, pp. 1337–1351, 2000.
View at: Google Scholar
E. T. Korgun, C. Celik-Ozenci, N. Acar, S. Cayli, G. Desoye, and R. Demir, “Location of cell cycle regulators cyclin B1, cyclin A, PCNA, Ki67 and cell cycle inhibitors p21, p27 and p57 in human first trimester placenta and deciduas,” Histochemistry and Cell Biology, vol. 125, no. 6, pp. 615–624, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. M. Bamberger, C. Bamberger, S. Aupers, K. Milde-Langosch, T. Löning, and A. Makrigiannakis, “Expression pattern of the activating protein-1 family of transcription factors in the human placenta,” Molecular Human Reproduction, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 223–228, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Schuchard, J. P. Landers, N. P. Sandhu, and T. C. Spelsberg, “Steroid hormone regulation of nuclear proto-oncogenes,” Endocrine Reviews, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 659–669, 1993.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Salmi and F. M. Rutanen, “C-fos and c-jun expression in human endometrium and myometrium,” Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology, vol. 117, no. 2, pp. 233–240, 1996.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Salmi, M. Ämmälä, and E. M. Rutanen, “Proto-oncogenes c-jun and c-fos are down-regulated in human endometrium during pregnancy: relationship to oestrogen receptor status,” Molecular Human Reproduction, vol. 2, no. 12, pp. 979–984, 1996.
View at: Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2011 Padma Murthi et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

2917

Downloads

1936

Citations