Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Pregnancy
Volume 2011, Article ID 640715, 15 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/640715
Review Article

Diagnosis and Management of Fetal Growth Restriction

1Obstetrics and Gynecology, London Deanery, London WC1B 5DN, UK
2Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine and Ultrasound, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Washington University, Campus Box 8064, 4566 Scott Avenue, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA

Received 14 September 2010; Revised 17 January 2011; Accepted 15 February 2011

Academic Editor: R. L. Deter

Copyright © 2011 Jacqueline E. A. K. Bamfo and Anthony O. Odibo. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. H. S. Brar and S. E. Rutherford, “Classification of intrauterine growth retardation,” Seminars in Perinatology, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 2–10, 1988. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. I. Bernstein, S. G. Gabbe, and K. L. Reed, “Intrauterine growth restriction,” in Obstetrics: Normal and Problem Pregnancies, S. G. Gabbe et al., Ed., p. 869, Churchill Livingstone, New York, NY, USA, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  3. P. W. Soothill, K. H. Nicolaides, and S. Campbell, “Prenatal asphyxia, hyperlacticaemia, hypoglycaemia, and erythroblastosis in growth retarded fetuses,” British Medical Journal, vol. 294, no. 6579, pp. 1051–1053, 1987. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. D. J. P. Barker, A. R. Bull, C. Osmond, and S. J. Simmonds, “Fetal and placental size and risk of hypertension in adult life,” British Medical Journal, vol. 301, no. 6746, pp. 259–262, 1990. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. D. J. P. Barker, P. D. Winter, C. Osmond, B. Margetts, and S. J. Simmonds, “Weight in infancy and death from ischaemic heart disease,” The Lancet, vol. 2, no. 8663, pp. 577–580, 1989. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. J. S. Dashe, D. D. McIntire, M. J. Lucas, and K. J. Leveno, “Effects of symmetric and asymmetric fetal growth on pregnancy outcomes,” Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 96, no. 3, pp. 321–327, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. World Health Organization, International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 1992.
  8. P. M. Doubilet and C. B. Benson, “Ultrasound evaluation of fetal growth,” in Ultrasonography in Obstetrics and Gynecology, P. W. Callen, Ed., WB Saunders, Philadelphia, Pa, USA, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  9. D. D. Mcintire, S. L. Bloom, B. M. Casey, and K. J. Leveno, “Birth weight in relation to morbidity and mortality among newborn infants,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 340, no. 16, pp. 1234–1238, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. J. F. Stratton, S. N. Scanaill, B. Stuart, and M. J. Turner, “Are babies of normal birth weight who fail to reach their growth potential as diagnosed by ultrasound at increased risk?” Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 114–118, 1995. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. A. M. Marconi, S. Ronzoni, P. Bozzetti, S. Vailati, A. Morabito, and F. C. Battaglia, “Comparison of fetal and neonatal growth curves in detecting growth restriction,” Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 112, no. 6, pp. 1227–1234, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. R. L. Deter, T. Stefos, R. B. Harrist, and R. M. Hill, “Detection of intrauterine growth retardation in twins using individualized growth assessment: I. Evaluation of growth outcome at birth,” Journal of Clinical Ultrasound, vol. 20, no. 9, pp. 573–577, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. R. L. Deter, T. Stefos, R. B. Harrist, and R. M. Hill, “Detection of intrauterine growth retardation in twins using individualized growth assessment. II. Evaluation of third-trimester growth and prediction of growth outcome at birth,” Journal of Clinical Ultrasound, vol. 20, no. 9, pp. 579–585, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. J. Gardosi, “Customized fetal growth standards: rationale and clinical application,” Seminars in Perinatology, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 33–40, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. R. L. Deter and L. R. Spence, “Identification of macrosomic, normal and intrauterine growth retarded neonates using the modified neonatal growth assessment score,” Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 58–67, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. R. L. Deter, “Individualized growth assessment: evaluation of growth using each fetus as its own control,” Seminars in Perinatology, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 23–32, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. J. A. Hutcheon, X. Zhang, R. W. Platt, S. Cnattingius, and M. S. Kramer, “The case against customised birthweight standards,” Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 11–16, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  18. J. A. Hutcheon, X. Zhang, S. Cnattingius, M. S. Kramer, and R. W. Platt, “Customised birthweight percentiles: does adjusting for maternal characteristics matter?” International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol. 115, no. 11, pp. 1397–1404, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. W. J. Ott, “Intrauterine growth restriction and doppler ultrasonography,” Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, vol. 19, no. 10, pp. 661–665, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. M. Ounsted, V. A. Moar, and A. Scott, “Risk factors associated with small-for-dates and large-for-dates infants,” British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol. 92, no. 3, pp. 226–232, 1985. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. B. M. Sibai, T. N. Abdella, and G. D. Anderson, “Pregnancy outcome in 211 patients with mild chronic hypertension,” Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 61, no. 5, pp. 571–576, 1983. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. O. Langer, J. Levy, L. Brustman, A. Anyaegbunam, R. Merkatz, and M. Divon, “Glycemic control in gestational diabetes mellitus—how tight is tight enough: small for gestational age versus large for gestational age?” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 161, no. 3, pp. 646–653, 1989. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. Z. Alfirevic, D. Roberts, and V. Martlew, “How strong is the association between maternal thrombophilia and adverse pregnancy outcome? A systematic review,” European Journal of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, vol. 101, no. 1, pp. 6–14, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. F. G. Cunningham, S. M. Cox, T. W. Harstad, R. A. Mason, and J. A. Pritchard, “Chronic renal disease and pregnancy outcome,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 163, no. 2, pp. 453–459, 1990. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. M. J. Kupferminc, H. Peri, E. Zwang, Y. Yaron, I. Wolman, and A. Eldor, “High prevalence of the prothrombin gene mutation in women with intrauterine growth retardation, abruptio placentae and second trimester loss,” Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, vol. 79, no. 11, pp. 963–967, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. R. L. Naeye, “Prenatal organ and cellular growth with various chromosomal disorders,” Biologia Neonatorum, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 248–260, 1967. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. M. J. Khoury, J. D. Erickson, J. F. Cordero, and B. J. McCarthy, “Congenital malformations and intrauterine growth retardation: a population study,” Pediatrics, vol. 82, no. 1, pp. 83–90, 1988. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. R. J. M. Snijders, C. Sherrod, C. M. Gosden, and K. H. Nicolaides, “Fetal growth retardation: associated malformations and chromosomal abnormalities,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 168, no. 2, pp. 547–555, 1993. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. K. B. Fowler, S. Stagno, R. F. Pass, W. J. Britt, T. J. Boll, and C. A. Alford, “The outcome of congenital cytomegalovirus infection in relation to maternal antibody status,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 326, no. 10, pp. 663–667, 1992. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. J. C. P. Kingdom and P. Kaufmann, “Oxygen and placental villous development: origins of fetal hypoxia,” Placenta, vol. 18, no. 8, pp. 613–621, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. V. S. Lestou and D. K. Kalousek, “Confined placental mosaicism and intrauterine fetal growth,” Archives of Disease in Childhood: Fetal and Neonatal Edition, vol. 79, no. 3, pp. F223–F226, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. T. Y. Khong, F. De Wolf, W. B. Robertson, and I. Brosens, “Inadequate maternal vascular response to placentation in pregnancies complicated by pre-eclampsia and by small-for-gestational age infants,” British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol. 93, no. 10, pp. 1049–1059, 1986. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. R. Pijnenborg, L. Vercruysse, and M. Hanssens, “The uterine spiral arteries in human pregnancy: facts and controversies,” Placenta, vol. 27, no. 9-10, pp. 939–958, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. G. J. Burton, A. W. Woods, E. Jauniaux, and J. C. P. Kingdom, “Rheological and Physiological Consequences of Conversion of the Maternal Spiral Arteries for Uteroplacental Blood Flow during Human Pregnancy,” Placenta, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 473–482, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. K. Benirschke and P. Kaufmann, athology of the Human Placenta, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 4th edition, 2000.
  36. S. W. Wen, R. L. Goldenberg, G. R. Cutter, H. J. Hoffman, and S. P. Cliver, “Intrauterine growth retardation and preterm delivery: prenatal risk factors in an indigent population,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 162, no. 1, pp. 213–218, 1990. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. L. E. Keyes, J. F. Armaza, S. Niermeyer, E. Vargas, D. A. Young, and L. G. Moore, “Intrauterine growth restriction, preeclampsia, and intrauterine mortality at high altitude in Bolivia,” Pediatric Research, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 20–25, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. M. Alberry and P. Soothill, “Management of fetal growth restriction,” Archives of Disease in Childhood: Fetal and Neonatal Edition, vol. 92, no. 1, pp. F62–F67, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. I. K. Rossavik and J. I. Fishburne, “Conceptional age, menstrual age, and ultrasound age: a second-trimester comparison of pregnancies of known conception date with pregnancies dated from the last menstrual period,” Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 73, no. 2, pp. 243–249, 1989. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. S. M. Bailey, P. Sarmandal, and J. M. Grant, “A comparison of three methods of assessing inter-observer variation applied to measurement of the symphysis-fundal height,” British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol. 96, no. 11, pp. 1266–1271, 1989. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. A. Coomarasamy, “Investigation and management of the small-for-gestational-age fetus,” Guidelines and Audit Committee of the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG), London 2002.
  42. J. Gardosi and A. Francis, “Controlled trial of fundal height measurement plotted on customised antenatal growth charts,” British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol. 106, no. 4, pp. 309–317, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. A. Jahn, O. Razum, and P. Berle, “Routine screening for intrauterine growth retardation in Germany: low sensitivity and questionable benefit for diagnosed cases,” Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, vol. 77, no. 6, pp. 643–648, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. D. A. Nyberg, L. A. Mack, F. C. Laing, and R. M. Patten, “Distinguishing normal from abnormal gestational sac growth in early pregnancy,” Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 23–27, 1987. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. H. P. Robinson and J. E. E. Fleming, “A critical evaluation of sonar "crown-rump length" measurements,” British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol. 82, no. 9, pp. 702–710, 1975. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. G. C. S. Smith, M. F. S. Smith, M. B. Mcnay, and J. E. E. Fleming, “First-trimester growth and the risk of low birth weight,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 339, no. 25, pp. 1817–1822, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. D. O. Mook-Kanamori, E. A. P. Steegers, P. H. Eilers, H. Raat, A. Hofman, and V. W. V. Jaddoe, “Risk factors and outcomes associated with first-trimester fetal growth restriction,” Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 303, no. 6, pp. 527–534, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. N. G. Pedersen, K. R. Wøjdemann, T. Scheike, and A. Tabor, “Fetal growth between the first and second trimesters and the risk of adverse pregnancy outcome,” Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 147–154, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. M. Mongelli, N. G. Yuxin, A. Biswas, and S. Chew, “Accuracy of ultrasound dating formulae in the late second-trimester in pregnancies conceived with in-vitro fertilization,” Acta Radiologica, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 452–455, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. F. P. Hadlock, R. L. Deter, R. B. Harrist, and S. K. Park, “Fetal biparietal diameter: a critical re-evaluation of the relation to menstrual age by means of real-time ultrasound,” Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 97–104, 1982. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. C. B. Benson and P. M. Doubilet, “Sonographic prediction of gestational age: accuracy of second- and third-trimester fetal measurements,” American Journal of Roentgenology, vol. 157, no. 6, pp. 1275–1277, 1991. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. M. J. Shepard, V. A. Richards, and R. L. Berkowitz, “An evaluation of two equations for predicting fetal weight by ultrasound,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 142, no. 1, pp. 47–54, 1982. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. F. P. Hadlock, R. B. Harrist, and R. S. Sharman, “Estimation of fetal weight with the use of head, body, and femur measurements—a prospective study,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 151, no. 3, pp. 333–337, 1985. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. S. C. Blackwell, J. Moldenhauer, M. Redman, S. S. Hassan, H. M. Wolfe, and S. M. Berry, “Relationship between the sonographic pattern of intrauterine growth restriction and acid-base status at the time of cordocentesis,” Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, vol. 264, no. 4, pp. 191–193, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. J. Gardosi, A. Chang, B. Kalyan, D. Sahota, and E. M. Symonds, “Customised antenatal growth charts,” The Lancet, vol. 339, no. 8788, pp. 283–287, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  56. I. K. Rossavik and R. L. Deter, “Mathematical modeling of fetal growth: I. Basic principles,” Journal of Clinical Ultrasound, vol. 12, no. 9, pp. 529–533, 1984. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  57. J. Gardosi, F. Figueras, B. Clausson, and A. Francis, “The customised growth potential: an international research tool to study the epidemiology of fetal growth,” Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 2–10, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  58. F. Figueras, J. Figueras, E. Meler et al., “Customised birthweight standards accurately predict perinatal morbidity,” Archives of Disease in Childhood: Fetal and Neonatal Edition, vol. 92, no. 4, pp. F277–F280, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  59. R. C. o. O. a. Gynaecologists, “investigation and Management of the Small for Gestational ” RCOG, 2002.
  60. F. P. Hadlock, R. B. Harrist, and J. Martinez-Poyer, “In utero analysis of fetal growth: a sonographic weight standard,” Radiology, vol. 181, no. 1, pp. 129–133, 1991. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  61. R. Bukowski, T. Uchida, G. C. S. Smith et al., “Individualized norms of optimal fetal growth: fetal growth potential,” Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 111, no. 5, pp. 1065–1076, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  62. S. Campbell and A. Thoms, “Ultrasound measurement of the fetal head to abdomen circumference ratio in the assessment of growth retardation,” British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol. 84, no. 3, pp. 165–174, 1977. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  63. T. R. Moore and J. E. Cayle, “The amniotic fluid index in normal human pregnancy,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 162, no. 5, pp. 1168–1173, 1990. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  64. E. Schiff, G. Ben-Baruch, O. Kushnir, and S. Mashiach, “Standardized measurement of amniotic fluid volume by correlation of sonography with dye dilution technique,” Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 76, no. 1, pp. 44–46, 1990. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  65. G. A. Dildy, N. Lira, K. J. Moise, G. D. Riddle, and R. L. Deter, “Amniotic fluid volume assessment: comparison of ultrasonographic estimates versus direct measurements with a dye-dilution technique in human pregnancy,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 167, no. 4 I, pp. 986–994, 1992. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  66. S. P. Chauhan, E. F. Magann, J. C. Morrison et al., “Ultrasonographic assessment of amniotic fluid does not reflect actual amniotic fluid volume,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 177, no. 2, pp. 291–297, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  67. D. K. Waller, L. S. Lustig, A. H. Smith, and E. B. Hook, “Alpha-fetoprotein: a biomarker for pregnancy outcome,” Epidemiology, vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 471–476, 1993. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  68. G. C. S. Smith, E. J. Stenhouse, J. A. Crossley, D. A. Aitken, A. D. Cameron, and J. Michael Connor, “Early pregnancy levels of pregnancy-associated plasma protein A and the risk of intrauterine growth restriction, premature birth, preeclampsia, and stillbirth,” Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 87, no. 4, pp. 1762–1767, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  69. K. Spencer, N. J. Cowans, K. Avgidou, F. Molina, and K. H. Nicolaides, “First-trimester biochemical markers of aneuploidy and the prediction of small-for-gestational age fetuses,” Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 15–19, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  70. G. C. S. Smith, I. Shah, J. A. Crossley et al., “Pregnancy-associated plasma protein A and alpha-fetoprotein and prediction of adverse perinatal outcome,” Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 107, no. 1, pp. 161–166, 2006. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  71. K. Spencer, C. K. H. Yu, N. J. Cowans, C. Otigbah, and K. H. Nicolaides, “Prediction of pregnancy complications by first-trimester maternal serum PAPP-A and free β-hCG and with second-trimester uterine artery Doppler,” Prenatal Diagnosis, vol. 25, no. 10, pp. 949–953, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  72. L. Dugoff, J. C. Hobbins, F. D. Malone et al., “First-trimester maternal serum PAPP-A and free-beta subunit human chorionic gonadotropin concentrations and nuchal translucency are associated with obstetric complications: a population-based screening study (The FASTER Trial),” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 191, no. 4, pp. 1446–1451, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  73. K. Pihl, T. Larsen, L. Krebs, and M. Christiansen, “First trimester maternal serum PAPP-A, β-hCG and ADAM12 in prediction of small-for-gestational-age fetuses,” Prenatal Diagnosis, vol. 28, no. 12, pp. 1131–1135, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  74. N. J. Cowans and K. Spencer, “First-trimester ADAM12 and PAPP-A as markers for intrauterine fetal growth restriction through their roles in the insulin-like growth factor system,” Prenatal Diagnosis, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 264–271, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  75. G. Steinberg, C. Lee, J. A. Rauh-Hain et al., “Early-pregnancy soluble Fas levels in idiopathic small-for-gestational-age pregnancies,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 202, no. 3, pp. 299 e291–299 e297, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  76. I. Chafetz, I. Kuhnreich, M. Sammar et al., “First-trimester placental protein 13 screening for preeclampsia and intrauterine growth restriction,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 197, no. 1, pp. 35 e31–35 e37, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  77. Y. Giguère, M. Charland, E. Bujold et al., “Combining biochemical and ultrasonographic markers in predicting preeclampsia: a systematic review,” Clinical Chemistry, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 361–375, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  78. S. Campbell, J. Diaz Recasens, and D. R. Griffen, “New Doppler technique for assessing uteroplacental blood flow,” The Lancet, vol. 1, no. 8326, pp. 675–677, 1983. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  79. S. Campbell, J. M. F. Pearce, and G. Hackett, “Qualitative assessment of uteroplacental blood flow: early screening test for high-risk pregnancies,” Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 68, no. 5, pp. 649–653, 1986. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  80. G. Albaiges, H. Missfelder-Lobos, C. Lees, M. Parra, and K. H. Nicolaides, “One-stage screening for pregnancy complications by color Doppler assessment of the uterine arteries at 23 weeks' gestation,” Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 96, no. 4, pp. 559–564, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  81. S. Bower, S. Vyas, S. Campbell, and K. H. Nicolaides, “Color Doppler imaging of the uterine artery in pregnancy: normal ranges of impedance to blood flow, mean velocity and volume of flow,” ltrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 2, pp. 261–265, 1992. View at Google Scholar
  82. K. Harrington, D. Cooper, C. Lees, K. Hecher, and S. Campbell, “Doppler ultrasound of the uterine arteries: the importance of bilateral notching in the prediction of pre-eclampsia, placental abruption or delivery of a small-for-gestational-age baby,” Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 182–188, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  83. I. Caniggia, J. Winter, S. J. Lye, and M. Post, “Oxygen and placental development during the first trimester: implications for the pathophysiology of pre-eclampsia,” Placenta, vol. 21, supplement A, pp. S25–S30, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  84. A. M. Martin, R. Bindra, P. Curcio, S. Cicero, and K. H. Nicolaides, “Screening for pre-eclampsia and fetal growth restriction by uterine artery Doppler at 11-14 weeks of gestation,” Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 583–586, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  85. O. Gómez, J. M. Martínez, F. Figueras et al., “Uterine artery Doppler at 11-14 weeks of gestation to screen for hypertensive disorders and associated complications in an unselected population,” Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 490–494, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  86. L. Dugoff, A. M. Lynch, D. Cioffi-Ragan et al., “First trimester uterine artery Doppler abnormalities predict subsequent intrauterine growth restriction,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 193, no. 3, pp. 1208–1212, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  87. A. T. Papageorghiou, C. K. H. Yu, R. Bindra, G. Pandis, and K. H. Nicolaides, “Multicenter screening for pre-eclampsia and fetal growth restriction by transvaginal uterine artery Doppler at 23 weeks of gestation,” Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 441–449, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  88. A. Pilalis, A. P. Souka, P. Antsaklis et al., “Screening for pre-eclampsia and fetal growth restriction by uterine artery Doppler and PAPP-A at 11-14 weeks' gestation,” Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 135–140, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  89. L. C. Cheng, D. M. F. Gibb, R. A. Ajayi, and P. W. Soothill, “A comparison between computerised (mean range) and clinical visual cardiotocographic assessment,” British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol. 99, no. 10, pp. 817–820, 1992. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  90. R. S. Black and S. Campbell, “Cardiotocography versus Doppler,” Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 148–151, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  91. J. Pardey, M. Moulden, and C. W. Redman, “A computer system for the numerical analysis of nonstress tests,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 186, no. 5, pp. 1095–1103, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  92. E. R. Guzman, A. M. Vintzileos, M. Martins, C. Benito, C. Houlihan, and M. Hanley, “The efficacy of individual computer heart rate indices in detecting acidemia at birth in growth-restricted fetuses,” Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 87, no. 6, pp. 969–974, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  93. L. S. M. Ribbert, R. J. M. Snijders, K. H. Nicolaides, and G. H. A. Visser, “Relation of fetal blood gases and data from computer-assisted analysis of fetal heart rate patterns in small for gestation fetuses,” British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol. 98, no. 8, pp. 820–823, 1991. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  94. R. K. Freeman, G. Anderson, and W. Dorchester, “A prospective multi-institutional study of antepartum fetal heart rate monitoring. I. Risk of perinatal mortality and morbidity according to antepartum fetal heart rate test results,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 143, no. 7, pp. 771–777, 1982. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  95. F. A. Manning, I. Morrison, C. R. Harman, and S. M. Menticoglou, “The abnormal fetal biophysical profile score. V. Predictive accuracy according to score composition,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 162, no. 4, pp. 918–927, 1990. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  96. F. A. Manning, C. R. Harman, I. Morrison, S. M. Menticoglou, I. R. Lange, and J. M. Johnson, “Fetal assessment based on fetal biophysical profile scoring. IV. An analysis of perinatal morbidity and mortality,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 162, no. 3, pp. 703–709, 1990. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  97. A. M. Vintzileos, S. E. Gaffney, and L. M. Salinger, “The relationships among the fetal biophysical profile, umbilical cord pH, and Apgar scores,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 157, no. 3, pp. 627–631, 1987. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  98. F. A. Manning, I. Morrison, and I. R. Lange, “Fetal biophysical profile scoring: selective use of the nonstress test,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 156, no. 3, pp. 709–712, 1987. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  99. L. D. Platt, G. S. Eglinton, and L. Sipos, “Further experience with the fetal biophysical profile,” Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 61, no. 4, pp. 480–485, 1983. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  100. S. R. Inglis, M. L. Druzin, W. E. Wagner, and E. Kogut, “The use of vibroacoustic stimulation during the abnormal or equivocal biophysical profile,” Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 82, no. 3, pp. 371–374, 1993. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  101. Z. Alfirevic and J. P. Neilson, “Biophysical profile for fetal assessment in high risk pregnancies,” Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, no. 2, Article ID CD000038, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  102. A. A. Baschat, U. Gembruch, and C. R. Harman, “The sequence of changes in Doppler and biophysical parameters as severe fetal growth restriction worsens,” Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 571–577, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  103. A. A. Baschat, “Fetal responses to placental insufficiency: an update,” International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol. 111, no. 10, pp. 1031–1041, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  104. C. P. Weiner, “The relationship between the umbilical artery systolic/diastolic ratio and umbilical blood gas measurements in specimens obtained by cordocentesis,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 162, no. 5, pp. 1198–1202, 1990. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  105. J. C. P. Kingdom, S. J. Burrell, and P. Kaufmann, “Pathology and clinical implications of abnormal umbilical artery Doppler waveforms,” Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 271–286, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  106. Z. Alfirevic and J. P. Neilson, “Doppler ultrasonography in high-risk pregnancies: systematic review with meta-analysis,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 172, no. 5, pp. 1379–1387, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  107. H. B. Westergaard, J. Langhoff-Roos, G. Lingman, K. Marsál, and S. Kreiner, “A critical appraisal of the use of umbilical artery Doppler ultrasound in high-risk pregnancies: use of meta-analyses in evidence-based obstetrics,” Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 466–476, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  108. G. Sterne, L. E. Shields, and T. J. Dubinsky, “Abnormal fetal cerebral and umbilical doppler measurements in fetuses with intrauterine growth restriction predicts the severity of perinatal morbidity,” Journal of Clinical Ultrasound, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 146–151, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  109. R. Madazli, S. Uludaǧ, and V. Ocak, “Doppler assessment of umbilical artery, thoracic aorta and middle cerebral artery in the management of pregnancies with growth restriction,” Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, vol. 80, no. 8, pp. 702–707, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  110. A. O. Odibo, C. Riddick, E. Pare, D. M. Stamilio, and G. A. Macones, “Cerebroplacental Doppler ratio and adverse perinatal outcomes in intrauterine growth restriction: evaluating the impact of using gestational age-specific reference values,” Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, vol. 24, no. 9, pp. 1223–1228, 2005. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  111. G. Mari, F. Hanif, M. Kruger, E. Cosmi, J. Santolaya-Forgas, and M. C. Treadwell, “Middle cerebral artery peak systolic velocity: a new Doppler parameter in the assessment of growth-restricted fetuses,” Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 310–316, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  112. A. A. Baschat, U. Gembruch, I. Reiss, L. Gortner, C. P. Weiner, and C. R. Harman, “Longitudinal changes in the ductus venosus, cerebral transverse sinus and cardiotocogram in fetal growth restriction,” Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 407–413, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  113. M. Bellotti, G. Pennati, G. Pardi, and R. Fumero, “Dilatation of the ductus venosus in human fetuses: ultrasonographic evidence and mathematical modeling,” American Journal of Physiology, vol. 275, no. 5, pp. H1759–H1767, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  114. M. Tchirikov, K. Eisermann, C. Rybakowski, and H. J. Schröder, “Doppler ultrasound evaluation of ductus venosus blood flow during acute hypoxemia in fetal lambs,” Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 426–431, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  115. T. Kiserud, J. Kessler, C. Ebbing, and S. Rasmussen, “Ductus venosus shunting in growth-restricted fetuses and the effect of umbilical circulatory compromise,” Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 143–149, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  116. M. Bellotti, G. Pennati, C. De Gasperi, M. Bozzo, F. C. Battaglia, and E. Ferrazzi, “Simultaneous measurements of umbilical venous, fetal hepatic, and ductus venosus blood flow in growth-restricted human fetuses,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 190, no. 5, pp. 1347–1358, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  117. K. Hecher, C. M. Bilardo, R. H. Stigter et al., “Monitoring of fetuses with intrauterine growth restriction: a longitudinal study,” Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 564–570, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  118. E. Ferrazzi, M. Bozzo, S. Rigano et al., “Temporal sequence of abnormal Doppler changes in the peripheral and central circulatory systems of the severely growth-restricted fetus,” Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 140–146, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  119. M. V. Senat, P. Schwrzler, A. Alcais, and Y. Ville, “Longitudinal changes in the ductus venosus, cerebral transverse sinus and cardiotocogram in fetal growth restriction,” Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 19–24, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  120. A. A. Baschat, H. L. Galan, A. Bhide et al., “Doppler and biophysical assessment in growth restricted fetuses: distribution of test results,” Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 41–47, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  121. R. Cruz-Martínez, F. Figueras, A. Benavides-Serralde, F. Crispi, E. Hernandez-Andrade, and E. Gratacós, “Sequence of changes in myocardial performance index in relation with aortic isthmus and ductus venosus Doppler in fetuses with early-onset intrauterine growth restriction,” Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology. In press. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  122. C. R. Roh, V. Budhraja, H. S. Kim, D. M. Nelson, and Y. Sadovsky, “Microarray-based identification of differentially expressed genes in hypoxic term human trophoblasts and in placental villi of pregnancies with growth restricted fetuses,” Placenta, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 319–328, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  123. J. McMinn, M. Wei, Y. Sadovsky, H. M. Thaker, and B. Tycko, “Imprinting of PEG1/MEST isoform 2 in human placenta,” Placenta, vol. 27, no. 2-3, pp. 119–126, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  124. B. Tycko and I. M. Morison, “Physiological functions of imprinted genes,” Journal of Cellular Physiology, vol. 192, no. 3, pp. 245–258, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  125. R. Shankar, F. Cullinane, S. P. Brennecke, and E. K. Moses, “Applications of proteomic methodologies to human pregnancy research: a growing gestation approaching delivery?” Proteomics, vol. 4, no. 7, pp. 1909–1917, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  126. K. H. Nicolaides, R. J. Bradley, and P. W. Soothill, “Maternal oxygen therapy for intrauterine growth retardation,” The Lancet, vol. 1, no. 8539, pp. 942–945, 1987. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  127. U. Nicolini, C. Hubinont, J. Santolaya, N. M. Fisk, and C. H. Rodeck, “Effects of fetal intravenous glucose challenge in normal and growth retarded fetuses,” Hormone and Metabolic Research, vol. 22, no. 8, pp. 426–430, 1990. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  128. M. Gülmezoglu, M. De Onis, and J. Villar, “Effectiveness of interventions to prevent or treat impaired fetal growth,” Obstetrical and Gynecological Survey, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 139–149, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  129. M. S. Kramer and R. Kakuma, “Energy and protein intake in pregnancy,” Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, no. 4, Article ID CD000032, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  130. W. W. Fawzi, G. I. Msamanga, W. Urassa et al., “Vitamins and perinatal outcomes among HIV-negative women in Tanzania,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 356, no. 14, pp. 1423–1431, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  131. N. Pattison and L. McCowan, “Cardiotocography for antepartum fetal assessment,” Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, no. 2, Article ID CD001068, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  132. D. Oros, F. Figueras, R. Cruz-Martinez, E. Meler, M. Munmany, and E. Gratacos, “Longitudinal changes in uterine, umbilical and fetal cerebral Doppler indices in late-onset small-for-gestational age fetuses,” Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 191–195, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  133. B. Jacobsson, K. Ahlin, A. Francis, G. Hagberg, H. Hagberg, and J. Gardosi, “Cerebral palsy and restricted growth status at birth: population-based case-control study,” International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol. 115, no. 10, pp. 1250–1255, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  134. J. C. Sinclair, “Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of antenatal corticosteroid for the prevention of respiratory distress syndrome: discussion,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 173, no. 1, pp. 335–344, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  135. B. Van Bulck, G. M. Kalakoutis, P. Sak et al., “A randomised trial of timed delivery for the compromised preterm fetus: short term outcomes and bayesian interpretation,” International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol. 110, no. 1, pp. 27–32, 2003. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  136. J. G. Thornton, J. Hornbuckle, A. Vail, D. J. Spiegelhalter, and M. Levene, “Infant wellbeing at 2 years of age in the Growth Restriction Intervention Trial (GRIT): multicentred randomised controlled trial,” The Lancet, vol. 364, pp. 513–520, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  137. A. A. Baschat, E. Cosmi, C. M. Bilardo et al., “Predictors of neonatal outcome in early-onset placental dysfunction,” Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 109, no. 2, pp. 253–261, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  138. A. O. Odibo, J. N. Quinones, K. Lawrence-Cleary, D. M. Stamilio, and G. A. MacOnes, “What antepartum fetal test should guide the timing of delivery of the preterm growth-restricted fetus? a decision-analysis,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 191, no. 4, pp. 1477–1482, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  139. D. Maulik, “Management of fetal growth restriction: an evidence-based approach,” Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 320–334, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  140. A. Grant and C. M. Glazener, “Elective caesarean section versus expectant management for delivery of the small baby,” Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, no. 2, Article ID CD000078, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus