Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Pregnancy
Volume 2011, Article ID 848794, 7 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/848794
Review Article

Use of Continuous Electronic Fetal Monitoring in a Preterm Fetus: Clinical Dilemmas and Recommendations for Practice

St. George's Healthcare NHS Trust, Blackshaw Road, London SW17 0QT, UK

Received 1 April 2011; Accepted 24 May 2011

Academic Editor: Yves Jacquemyn

Copyright © 2011 Karolina Afors and Edwin Chandraharan. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. ACOG, “Intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring: nomenclature, interpretation, and general management principles,” ACOG Practice Bulletin, vol. 106, pp. 192–202, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  2. R. M. Grivell, Z. Alfirevic, G. M. Gyte, and D. Devane, “Antenatal cardiotocography for fetal assessment,” Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, no. 1, Article ID CD007863, 2010. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. E. Chandraharan, “Rational approach to electronic fetal monitoring during labour in "all" resource settings,” Sri Lanka journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol. 32, pp. 77–84, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  4. Y. Sorokin, L. J. Dierker, S. K. Pillay, I. E. Zador, M. L. Shreiner, and M. G. Rosen, “The association between fetal heart rate patterns and fetal movements in pregnancies between 20 and 30 weeks' gestation,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 143, no. 3, pp. 243–249, 1982. View at Google Scholar
  5. M. Westgren, P. Holmquist, N. W. Svenningsen, and I. Ingemarsson, “Intrapartum fetal monitoring in preterm deliveries: prospective study,” Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 99–106, 1982. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. T. Wheeler and A. Murrills, “Patterns of fetal heart rate during normal pregnancy,” British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol. 85, no. 1, pp. 18–27, 1978. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. B. Zanini, R. H. Paul, and J. R. Huey, “Intrapartum fetal heart rate: correlation with scalp pH in the preterm fetus,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 143, no. 1, pp. 952–957, 1980. View at Google Scholar
  8. F. Goupil, H. Legrand, and J. Vaquier, “Antepartum fetal heart rate monitoring. II. Deceleration patterns,” European Journal of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 239–249, 1981. View at Google Scholar
  9. E. Chandraharan and S. Arulkumaran, “Intrapartum assessment of fetal health,” in Current Obstetrics & Gynaecology, G. M. Mukherjee, Ed., Jaypee Brothers, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  10. C. E. East and P. B. Colditz, “Intrapartum oximetry of the fetus,” Anesthesia & Analgesia, vol. 105, pp. S59–S65, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  11. S. M. Baird and D. J. Ruth, “Electronic fetal monitoring of the preterm fetus,” Journal of Perinatal and Neonatal Nursing, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 12–24, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. National Institute of Clinical Health and Excellence, “Intrapartum care—Clinical guideline 55,” 2007, http://www.nice.org.uk/CG055.
  13. A. Tekin, S. Özkan, E. Çalişkan, S. Özeren, A. Çorakçi, and I. Yücesoy, “Fetal pulse oximetry: correlation with intrapartum fetal heart rate patterns and neonatal outcome,” Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research, vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 824–831, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. B. Langer, B. Carbonne, F. Goffinet, F. Le Gouëff, N. Berkane, and M. Laville, “Fetal pulse oximetry and fetal heart rate monitoring during stage II of labour,” European Journal of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, vol. 72, pp. 73–79, 1997. View at Google Scholar
  15. C. E. East, S. P. Brennecke, J. F. King, F. Y. Chan, and P. B. Colditz, “The effect of intrapartum fetal pulse oximetry, in the presence of a nonreassuring fetal heart rate pattern, on operative delivery rates: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial (the FOREMOST trial),” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 194, no. 3, p. 606, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. E. Chandraharan and S. Arulkumaran, “Prevention of birth asphyxia: responding appropriately to cardiotocograph (CTG) traces,” Best Practice and Research: Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 609–624, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus