Research Article
Can Preterm Labour Be Predicted in Low Risk Pregnancies? Role of Clinical, Sonographic, and Biochemical Markers
Table 4
Showing sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative likelihood ratios (LR) of some markers.
| Marker | Biological sample | Sensitivity (%) (95% CI) | Specificity (%) (95% CI) | Positive LR | Negative LR |
| phIGFBP-1 | Cervicovaginal fluid | 2 (0.005–0.062) | 97 (0.96–0.98) | 90 (0.28–2.8) | 100 (0.97–1.02) | ALP | Serum | 14 (0.09–0.21) | 99 (0.991–0998) | 35.18 (15.21–81.41) | 86 (0.80–0.91) | AFP | Serum | 8 (0.04–0.14) | 90 (0.84–0.94) | 93 (0.45–1.92) | 100 (0.95–1.05) | GCSF | Serum | 12 (0.08–0.19) | 99 (0.984–0.994) | 13 (6.96–24.67) | 88 (0.82–0.93) | IL6 | Serum | 8 (0.04–0.14) | 99 (0.984–0.994) | 8.96 (4.44–18.10) | 92 (0.87–0.96) | Cervical length | — | 14 (0.09–0.21) | 98 (0.97–0.99) | 9.85 (5.65–17.16) | 80 (0.81–0.92) |
|
|